Crawford #3 P4P by TBRB

[Sadiqkingofko]

1. Gonzalez
2. Kovalev
3. Crawford

I agree.

My Rankings

1. A. Ward 29-0(15) (175)
2. S. Kovalev 30-0-1(26) (175) WBA (Super), WBO, IBF
3. M. Pacquaio 58-6-2(38) (147)
4. G. Rigondeaux 17-0(11) (122) WBA (Super), Lineal
5. R. Gonzalez 45-0(38) (112) WBC, Ring, Lineal
6. T. Fury 25-0(18) (201+) WBA (Super), WBO, IBO, Ring, Lineal
7. T. Crawford 29-0(20) (140) WBC, WBO, Ring, Lineal
8. C. Alvarez 47-1-1(33) (154)
9. W. Klitschko 64-4(53) (201+)
10. G. Golovkin 35-0(32) (160) WBC, WBA (Super), IBF, IBO
11. L. Cruz 32-0-1(18) (126) WBA (Super)
12. T. Bradley 33-2-1(13) (147)
13. A. Stevenson 27-1(22) (175) WBC, Ring, Lineal
14. D. Garcia 32-0(18) (147) WBC
15. E. Lara 23-2-2(13) (154) WBA (Super)

[Real King Kong]

1. Gonzalez
2. Kovalev
3. Crawford

I agree.

I don't mind that list...donno about estrada #5 and bradley #7 tho.

[Earl-Hickey]

Remember when we had Floyd pac cotto etc at the top of p4p lists

[M Bison]

Very undeservingly rated number 3 I think his nationality is pushing his rating quicker than anything else he certainly hasn't beat better than Golovkin not yet at least but as I said the fact he has that little American flag next to his name that goes for a lot.

How can you have him rated above so many people when he doesn't even have a relatively close good wins?

[M Bison]

My Rankings

1. A. Ward 29-0(15) (175)
2. S. Kovalev 30-0-1(26) (175) WBA (Super), WBO, IBF
3. M. Pacquaio 58-6-2(38) (147)
4. G. Rigondeaux 17-0(11) (122) WBA (Super), Lineal
5. R. Gonzalez 45-0(38) (112) WBC, Ring, Lineal
6. T. Fury 25-0(18) (201+) WBA (Super), WBO, IBO, Ring, Lineal
7. T. Crawford 29-0(20) (140) WBC, WBO, Ring, Lineal
8. C. Alvarez 47-1-1(33) (154)
9. W. Klitschko 64-4(53) (201+)
10. G. Golovkin 35-0(32) (160) WBC, WBA (Super), IBF, IBO
11. L. Cruz 32-0-1(18) (126) WBA (Super)
12. T. Bradley 33-2-1(13) (147)
13. A. Stevenson 27-1(22) (175) WBC, Ring, Lineal
14. D. Garcia 32-0(18) (147) WBC
15. E. Lara 23-2-2(13) (154) WBA (Super)

Don't agree with it but its a better top three than the one from TBRB.

[LacedUp]

Crawford is #1 for me.

[LacedUp]

Very undeservingly rated number 3 I think his nationality is pushing his rating quicker than anything else he certainly hasn't beat better than Golovkin not yet at least but as I said the fact he has that little American flag next to his name that goes for a lot.

How can you have him rated above so many people when he doesn't even have a relatively close good wins?

Crawford hasn't beaten better opposition than GGG?

.... Ok

[b00g13man]

I'm not mad at that at all.

[M Bison]

Crawford hasn't beaten better opposition than GGG?

.... Ok

Beating a 126lber at 135lbs with a year and a bit layoff and coming off of steroids isn't impressive.

Only trolls would try and dispute Postol being better than Lemieux, Murray, Geale and so on, pathetic trolls.

[NaijaD]

Beating a 126lber at 135lbs with a year and a bit layoff and coming off of steroids isn't impressive.

Only trolls would try and dispute Postol being better than Lemieux, Murray, Geale and so on, pathetic trolls.

I think Postol is a better single win than anything Golovkin has thus far, I don't think anyone can dispute that but in terms of volume of good wins I think GGG has the edge. However most people tend to favour best wins over number of good wins when it comes to P4P lists.

Unfortunately GGG doesn't have a number 2 guy willing to fight him at 160, that can garner sympathy but it can't get him a pass on the p4p list.

Your continued bias is so shocking at times, I worry that you think you're being objective. Yes Gamboa was at his best at 126 but at the time he fought Crawford he was way past being able to make that weight, Crawford was not his only fight at 135 either. In the end Gamboa was undersized but no need to make it sound like he got dragged up 9 pounds for a one and done fight with TC.