Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Saunders on Canelo: He Robbed Fans, An Absolute Little ****bag!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by JUNIABOY View PostYou're skewing the information here...all the fighters you named all lobbied for fights against Pacquiao (no matter what catchweight)...& they lobbied hardcore for the payday. All of em agreed to the catchweight...and Algieri was taking a step up from a weight division to fight him...basicaly, Pacquiao was giving him a break by not forcing him up all the way to 147...same with Rios & Marquez. He gave them a break. He even gave Margarito a break by fighting him at 152 instead of forcing 147. You're trying to make it seem like Pacquiao is the worst ever because he used catchweights...but reading between the lines, he used catchweights in a way that allowed his opponents to be closer to their prime weight as possible. The DLH fight was DLH's choice of a catchweight, pacquiao had no say. And the Cotto fight, Cotto lobbied for the payday by agreeing to 145...agreeing that, at the time, Pacquiao was a tiny fighter in comparison to him (which he was). Pacquiao would even be considered the smallest WW among all the WW's...& that's not stretching the truth. Hatton was allowed to fight closer to his prime weight as well. If you look up & down Pacquiao's resume regarding the CW's, he always gave the opponent a weight that was more suitable to their prime fighting weight. In essence, Pacquiao was looking for more of a challenge than any other boxer from his era. He's not dragging anybody up to the division. You couldn't be more wrong than that. And if anybody is to be blamed for the matchmaking, it's Top Rank. Pacquiao will always want the best challenge for his fans. Then again, most big promotion companies always look for easy matchmaking that maximizes earning potential. Otherwise, Pacquiao probably would have fought everybody. There's more information to be had if you want...try typing into youtube "proof manny pacquiao is the best fighter." The guy lays it all out for you on why Pacquiao is a warrior while canelo is not concerning catchweights. I dare you to watch that video...DARE YOU!
No, I'm not..... you tried to insinuate that Pacquiao only dragged 1 JMW up to "manny-weight".....
Originally posted by JUNIABOY View PostPac only ever fought once at 144
So, I corrected you.....
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View PostYou are full-of-it..... Algieri/Rios/Marquez.
And then you admitted that I was right.....
Originally posted by JUNIABOY View PostAlgieri was at 144...I'll give you that...Rios fight was at 145.
so..... I'm all good ^^
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by JUNIABOY View PostI wasn't 100% wrong, & you weren't 100% right. The Rios fight was at 145. I admitted when I tried to use what knowledge I had off the top of my head, & got it wrong. So what. It still doesn't excuse your trolling ways, trying to find *****s in arguments so that you can win an argument to satisfy your ego. For you, it never really is about the argument...it's about the winning. That says a lot about your character. Go seek help
kid, it was " manny-weight "..... regardless
Comment
-
Originally posted by AneesMoha View PostBased off of what? I based my statement of how Saunders body looked making 159.8 on what do you base that Canelo beats Golovkin at 155?
Based off the fact that GGG is 34yo and has been at 160 for 10+ years.
No way would he be the same fighter at 155..... NO WAY !
And Mayweather would have beaten him at 154 as well.
Even at 154, you have to be real-damn-good, and 100% on top of your game to beat Mayweather..... no way a compromised fighter beats him, not at 154..... Mayweather is too good.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View PostBased off the fact that GGG is 34yo and has been at 160 for 10+ years.
No way would he be the same fighter at 155..... NO WAY !
And Mayweather would have beaten him at 154 as well.
Even at 154, you have to be real-damn-good, and 100% on top of your game to beat Mayweather..... no way a compromised fighter beats him, not at 154..... Mayweather is too good.
Comment
-
People having a go at Saunders, who is the one that vacated? It certainly wasnt Saunders who would embarass Canelo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JUNIABOY View PostAlgieri was at 144...I'll give you that...Rios fight was at 145. Yet, it must be pointed out that Algieri was moving up from lightweight...actually, all the guys mentioned were moving up to welterweight. Algeiri's 1st fight at WW was a CW...shouldn't have been a problem there. Rios' better fight weight is at lightweight...shouldn't have been a problem there...oh, & Rios only complained about the CW after he lost (sour g****s?). Even Garcia had criticisms of Rios by saying that Rios is only using training camp as a fat camp...that's on Rios. And Marquez was basically a brand new WW as well...& definitely his best fight weight is not 147 (got destroyed by Bradley, remember). And you had to say it like Pacquiao was forcing JMM to come up to WW...didn't FMJ already do that 3 fights earlier?...do we get to criticize FMJ too? Or is the hate only reserved for Pacquiao? JMM wanted the fight...Pacquiao the WW champion didn't mind the fight...so, they negotiated a CW between the WW & the LW division...what's the problem there? This is how CW's work...2 popular boxers from 2 different weight classes negotiating to fight somewhere in-between. You can't just point out facts that only support your argument.
You're just grasping at straws dude. It's like, you have hate for everybody except your favorite fighters...that no one is never going to be good enough for you...even though a boxing fan always prioritizes the sport over the boxer. From what I've seen of your comments, you definitely prioritize the boxers first. A boxing fan you are not.
The only Pacquiao catchweight i had a problem with was Cotto at 145. It seemed unnecessary, like Canelo at 152. It puts asterisks next to wins that would have otherwise been fantastic
Comment
-
Comment