Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

📋📋whcih category of"boogeymen" are actually avoidede more often??💯🔞

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by STAX ON DECK View Post
    how sohuld they have been grouped?? offer sugguestions instead of just complaining.

    we are talking about boogeymen,not hype jobs. are you going to tell me that ggg and rigo arent boogeymen?
    why are you putting ward in the "boogeyman" category? it makes no sense at all because he has been the one avoiding fights. you have got it backwards.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by daggum View Post
      why would you put ward on the "avoided" list when its simply not true? do you not like facts? he has avoided everyone in his division for 4 years. can you imagine if ggg did that? would you be putting ggg on the avoided list if he didn't fight cotto, lee, quillin, etc? i dont think so. stop being biased and look at the facts. stop crying and saying ward is being ducked when its not true. stop trying to create a fake narrative where he's being avoided simply because he doesn't want to fight.
      the thing is,this thread is about boogeymen,its bigger then just ward and ggg. i know you are HEAVILY invested in ggg, especially since the only two fighters you post about are on their way out. i know it must be difficult with pacuiqoa going out the way he did,but you must understand that boxing has a wide variety of fighters. stop focusing on one aspect and focus on the entire picture

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by daggum View Post
        why are you putting ward in the "boogeyman" category? it makes no sense at all because he has been the one avoiding fights. you have got it backwards.
        who are the people "dying" to fight andre ward????especially at 168 where he was basically forced to move up because NO ONE would fight him

        obviously now that hes at a new weight class,some poeple are willing to test him since hes NEW to that class

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by STAX ON DECK View Post
          how sohuld they have been grouped?? offer sugguestions instead of just complaining.

          we are talking about boogeymen,not hype jobs. are you going to tell me that ggg and rigo arent boogeymen?
          you only called the first group as hyped jobs. both your groups have them.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Twako View Post
            you only called the first group as hyped jobs. both your groups have them.
            please quote me where i called them hype jobs,ill be waiting.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by STAX ON DECK View Post
              please quote me where i called them hype jobs,ill be waiting.
              you mentioned media hyped. if something/someone gets hyped up, it's mostly thru media, whether by reputable sources or through forums like these. where else would these writers, bloggers get their info nowadays?

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by STAX ON DECK View Post
                who are the people "dying" to fight andre ward????especially at 168 where he was basically forced to move up because NO ONE would fight him

                obviously now that hes at a new weight class,some poeple are willing to test him since hes NEW to that class
                It's more accurate to say they wanted an equal shake
                Wards only fought in USA, Oakland. Kessler wanted a rematch in Denmark & Froch wanted a rematch in Nottingham. Gg offered to meet him at a catchweights.
                For a so called boogeyman he's doesn't seem that avoided, closer to truth to say opponents don't want to let him have all the advantages.
                Now if he was a boogeyman and as good as he could be then he'd have had no problem giving a little to make a fight that he was completely confident of winning.
                If ward honestly fought & beat Froch with 1 hand then why would he worry about fighting him on his own patch with 2 hands, it'd be an easy win?
                Kessler, he hugged & butted him, now if it was accidental then ward would have been confident of beating him without fouls & spoiling in Kessler's back yard.
                If gg was so little then ward would have felt it no problem to train an extra few weeks & shift 4 pounds to make the fight.
                Those 3 fights would have been career high paydays & winnable fights.
                Far closer to the truth to say ward moans like a kid when he doesn't get it all his own way & then invents conspiracy's & stories.
                Truth is he knows some of his fans are naive & will Swallow it without question.
                Not only is he taking the piss with those 3 fighters but he's also taking the piss out of his own fans.
                He thinks you're all morons that will support his ****e without question.
                Now that's closer to the bone with zero spin

                Comment


                  #18
                  I voted for the option you clearly were biased against just because it was such a terribly loaded question.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Twako View Post
                    you mentioned media hyped. if something/someone gets hyped up, it's mostly thru media, whether by reputable sources or through forums like these. where else would these writers, bloggers get their info nowadays?
                    they were fan and media hyped without provocation,so yes they could be referred to as "hypejobs" but i didnt,i used the term boogeymen,which they are or were

                    lucas matthsyse was arguably the biggest media hyped fan created hypejob that there ever was until he was humbled by garcia and postal,but they also claimed he was a boogeyman to,especially after the dallas jr and peterson fights
                    Last edited by STAX ON DECK; 11-21-2015, 02:22 PM.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Raonic View Post
                      I voted for the option you clearly were biased against just because it was such a terribly loaded question.
                      give your full opinion instead of being a bitter loser,tell us how you really feel

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP