Originally posted by daggum
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
WBC President: "Miguel Cotto Told Me That He Is Facing Golovkin"
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by bigjavi973 View PostNo he doesn't but he WOULD fight for Ward's LINEAL TITLE at 168.
Wouldn't ya want a lineal title defended at the proper weight?
my personal preference would obviously be for the fight to happen at 168 so there are no excuses afterwards, however when 2 guys from different divisions fight, a "meet in the middle" deal isnt all that terrible.
That being said, if after that the smaller guy decides to stay and campaign in that division, then that should be the end of any catchweight demands.......
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Postwatch ggg demand a catchweight vs ward..... oh wait they did already.
Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Postdamn were people this upset at the ODH-Hopkins cw? Or the SRL vs Lalonde cw???
The sport of boxing needs some proper rules if it wants to be taken seriously as a top level sport. All this catchweight crap is one of many reasons boxing has fallen to become a fringe sport today.
It is not a serious sport when it is easy for fighters to find legal ways to gain an unethical advantage over an opponent. If catchweights are allowed in title fights, you may as well allow PED use as well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigjavi973 View PostNo he doesn't but he WOULD fight for Ward's LINEAL TITLE at 168.
Wouldn't ya want a lineal title defended at the proper weight?
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Postoh please. I would like the Ward-GGG fight for WARD'S LINEAL TITLE to be at the full limit, just like ya want the Cotto-GGG fight for Cotto's lineal title to be at the full limit.
Comment
-
Comment