Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

[tangalog2200]

To laugh at you losers, and keep you company.

you might as well answer the relevant questions asked regarding the iv issue....

what kind of company can you provide if you can not give straight forward answers to simple questions?

and....to laugh at losers? ha ha ha

[Zaroku]

"Not ping ponging on the issues."

the fact that you keep on harping about both may 01 & may 02 incidents does not support your above statement....

anyway, since it's Halloween, i'll give you a pass he he he

bad Halloween. Going home. On the train now.

Back to IV & other issues tomorrow

[torosboxing75]

Dorku on here daily defending Floyd. LMBO!!!

[DeadLikeMe]

It's kind of sad to think that the hundreds (even perhaps thousands) of very pro-Pac posters with all their shopped pictures, national flag avatars, and years of spamming this board in the five year buildup. They've been reduced to a half dozen in number maniacally spamming one thread on one boxing site talking about "in twenty years people will see the fight as at least a draw."

[ADP02]

I should probably clarify the "no evidence" line. What I mean is there isn't anything apparent that anyone with sense and oversight is acting on. Floyd appears to be doing pretty good, he isn't ducking or covering from media exposure. He isn't issuing daily press releases counter media questions developed overnight by sports journalists in war rooms. All objective data point to shadows and smoke.

If Mayweather hadn't left the safety and security of the HBO plantation none of this unpleasantness would be happening....

Isn't Manny under this so called "safety and security of the HBO plantation"? Yet, the NSAC quickly made sure that there would be a thorough investigation and had the attorney general’s office investigating Pacquiao’s shoulder injury to get to the bottom of a mistaken checkbox.


So the above just crapped on your come back post of yours


This was already mentioned in my previous post and why Floyd should be investigated. Remember that form, not 1 but 3 places where Floyd omitted to put any details relating to this IV scandal. Just for this sole reason, there is precedence and reason for an investigation .... but as you very well know, there is more including what the NSAC had to say about what USADA did was unacceptable.
Still, no investigation just to be sure that everything was on the up and up. The evidence presented shows that it is not on the up and up.


Then there is the excuses, I mean reasons, for this IV.
There is a video explaining that giving blood, urine and workout that contributed to requiring this IV. We know for a fact that there is no way that excuse 1 & 2 can possibly do that. Excuse #3 did not occur on May 1st. That is, Floyd would not be exerting any prolonged intense workout to the point that he would be so severely dehydrated that he would require an IV.

So again, there is plenty of reasons why an investigation should be done.


It brings me always back to Lance Armstrong.
There were always reasons to investigate him but as people including **** Pound (WADA prez/VP Olympics) would comment on, "the will was not". So Lance got away with it for a very long time.
At the end of the day, we found out that there were plenty of people involved in the scandal who helped cover it all up. This included teammates, doctors, the UCI and many more .......


Who is the UCI or ICU:
"is the world governing body for sports cycling and oversees international competitive cycling events. The UCI is based in Aigle, Switzerland.

The UCI issues racing licenses to riders and enforces disciplinary rules, such as in matters of doping"





.

[Spoon23]

Floyd Drago: 'I don't take PEDS! how can I? I can't even knock out anybody! That's BS to claim I was on IVS to mask PEDS! BS!!

'I can't hurt a fly! all I love doing is to run and hug in the ring! Why accuse me?!'

[ADP02]

It's kind of sad to think that the hundreds (even perhaps thousands) of very pro-Pac posters with all their shopped pictures, national flag avatars, and years of spamming this board in the five year buildup. They've been reduced to a half dozen in number maniacally spamming one thread on one boxing site talking about "in twenty years people will see the fight as at least a draw."

How ironic that we do not need to wait that long to find Floyd fans saying this TODAY with no proof.

Here is just from some who have been asking for "reason" and to be level headed about all this. May I say, I'm sure that I can find plenty of the same from DeadLikeMe too!!!

Just read the posts below. Careful, some may think you are a double agent and you are a Manny fan not a Floyd fan. You just put that comment on a silver plate.


As you can see below, no evidence required by Floyd fans to do and say the following (just a small portion of recent examples but there are over 6 years worth of examples):

A 5th fight?! Lol. Press stunts. Marquez ain't gonna give the easy way out for Pac in returning with fake shoulder injuries .......

agreed, 20 years from now on the new generation they won't know about this drama of dogmatic Pacnerds. They'll only know about the scandal of injury, and the video where Mayweather beat Pac. it's not complicated!

Now as for Pac he spent a long portion of his career avoiding blood testing and i found that su****ious

No Manny, things would not be different because you weren't injured in the fight dude...........
This guy is an embarrassment to the sport of boxing. Excuses, excuses, excuses......

On a serious note about Manny's shoulder, the rationale was constantly shifting like sand. ...... No, Manny and his inspired team of thieves tried to put one over on boxing fans.

.

[Slip Stream]

Isn't Manny under this so called "safety and security of the HBO plantation"? Yet, the NSAC quickly made sure that there would be a thorough investigation and had the attorney general’s office investigating Pacquiao’s shoulder injury to get to the bottom of a mistaken checkbox.


So the above just crapped on your come back post of yours


This was already mentioned in my previous post and why Floyd should be investigated. Remember that form, not 1 but 3 places where Floyd omitted to put any details relating to this IV scandal. Just for this sole reason, there is precedence and reason for an investigation .... but as you very well know, there is more including what the NSAC had to say about what USADA did was unacceptable.
Still, no investigation just to be sure that everything was on the up and up. The evidence presented shows that it is not on the up and up.


Then there is the excuses, I mean reasons, for this IV.
There is a video explaining that giving blood, urine and workout that contributed to requiring this IV. We know for a fact that there is no way that excuse 1 & 2 can possibly do that. Excuse #3 did not occur on May 1st. That is, Floyd would not be exerting any prolonged intense workout to the point that he would be so severely dehydrated that he would require an IV.

So again, there is plenty of reasons why an investigation should be done.


It brings me always back to Lance Armstrong.
There were always reasons to investigate him but as people including **** Pound (WADA prez/VP Olympics) would comment on, "the will was not". So Lance got away with it for a very long time.
At the end of the day, we found out that there were plenty of people involved in the scandal who helped cover it all up. This included teammates, doctors, the UCI and many more .......


Who is the UCI or ICU:
"is the world governing body for sports cycling and oversees international competitive cycling events. The UCI is based in Aigle, Switzerland.

The UCI issues racing licenses to riders and enforces disciplinary rules, such as in matters of doping"





.

Was Hauser behind Manny's troubles too because I wasn't sure if it was an HBO employee that sparked all that? That's what I mean by plantation, if Mayweather would have stayed on it, Hauser wouldn't have been overly interested in ivs. I'm not saying Mayweather would have been immune from scrutiny or investigation overall.

Again with you guys and the false equivalency of Lance Armstrong. Mayweather isn't being investigated and there is no talk about one happening that I've read or heard of, have you? There isn't any whispers of anything, Floyd's explanation was accepted for his iv use, and that's it.

Where's the investigation, not your endless posts filled with supposition? Where's the investigation?

[b00g13man]

Was Hauser behind Manny's troubles too because I wasn't sure if it was an HBO employee that sparked all that? That's what I mean by plantation, if Mayweather would have stayed on it, Hauser wouldn't have been overly interested in ivs. I'm not saying Mayweather would have been immune from scrutiny or investigation overall.

Again with you guys and the false equivalency of Lance Armstrong. Mayweather isn't being investigated and there is no talk about one happening that I've read or heard of, have you? There isn't any whispers of anything, Floyd's explanation was accepted for his iv use, and that's it.

Where's the investigation, not your endless posts filled with supposition? Where's the investigation?

FBI and Congress apparently.

[AllEyesOpen]

Mayweather requested and was granted a tue by the usada, complying with the international standards of the wada, now someone having su****ion as to the exact circumstances leading to Mayweather needing the tue is acceptable, but all those involved directly seem to be content with what was presented them, and that by YOU is explianed away with the theory that everyone is in Mayweather's pocket(nsac,usada,wada,nasa, ect.), same as your excuse for Pacquiao's loss to Mayweather and that bs is NOT acceptable.

Now as for Pac he spent a long portion of his career avoiding blood testing and i found that su****ious but i didn't invalidate his entire career and as a matter of fact have been a fan for some time, of couse i don't idolize him or think he can do no wrong and i still think it was su****ious.

I will say this, there's exactly as much actual evidence that Pac cheated as there is that Mayweather did, but 5-6 posters on this thread spend all day trying to convince anyone who listens(or maybe just yourselves) that it's an open and shut case and Mayweather's career is tainted, who coincidently are the same 5-6 posters who kept crying about slomo videos, but at the very least you all have something new to cling your hopes to.

Here, i wanted to make sure if I'm being quoted it's within context and I'm not being used to make a weak point.