Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Death_Adder View PostIs it my fault that in the last couple of days, the news has been about Fraud and his gay Bora Bora escapades with Beeber, gays, STDs and them sucking penis and taking penis? And they've all involved blacks?
Just posting what's on the news
Last edited by Spoon23; 10-31-2015, 10:55 PM.
Comment
Originally posted by Spoon23 View PostBreaking news! Floyd's Been spotted driving a stolen black Bonco on highway 69 which a white male dipping his head on Floyd as the car chase continuous!
Floyd is now being cast as a blend of OJ Simpson aka "The Juice" & The King of Pop Jackson with his chimpanzee Beiber. .
On highway 69, stolen black bronco (not even owned), Cops in pursuit!
These guys are losing it. It is part of the grief process for them.
The media has reported that PAC enjoyed Halloween in the Philippines, by dressing up as A lying-0ne-armed-forked-tongued-boxer-politician! He gave out cheap stale doughnuts to local children..
I need an IV now! Last night was a crazy Halloween, with a wild party.
Enjoy yours everyone.
Next year I am gonna market the PAC-O-Lantern It will only be dimly lit. Just like PAC.Last edited by Zaroku; 11-01-2015, 01:31 AM.
Comment
Originally posted by Slip Stream View PostWas Hauser behind Manny's troubles too because I wasn't sure if it was an HBO employee that sparked all that? That's what I mean by plantation, if Mayweather would have stayed on it, Hauser wouldn't have been overly interested in ivs. I'm not saying Mayweather would have been immune from scrutiny or investigation overall.
Again with you guys and the false equivalency of Lance Armstrong. Mayweather isn't being investigated and there is no talk about one happening that I've read or heard of, have you? There isn't any whispers of anything, Floyd's explanation was accepted for his iv use, and that's it.
Where's the investigation, not your endless posts filled with supposition? Where's the investigation?
Funny how you are trying to connect the dots with everything except what's in front of you.
Start with why was Manny quickly thrown under the bus by the NSAC and even by USADA for that mistaken checkbox to the point that they quickly said that it must be investigated. For Floyd, nope. Floyd had a medical condition, used IVs, took his vitamins with an IV but didn't let the NSAC know about it. Why the difference? Especially when Floyd actually did something that was on the prohibited list!!! Especially if NSAC said that the whole thing was not on the up and up. "UNACCEPTABLE" - said NSAC
Come on, even Ray Charles can see the similarities between Lance and Floyd.
Start with this:
- Like Lance, Floyd delayed testing for 5+ hours at least on 2 occasions.
- Both used something that was on the prohibited List.
- Like Lance, Floyd used USADA to manipulate the testing process.
- Both used IVs.
- Both had their representatives give large sums of money to those in charge of their sport in one form or another. UIC/USADA. USADA ironically called it "conflict of interest" when Lance did it.
- Both took something that was on the prohibited List then later requested it be approved after the fact.
- Like Lance used UIC, Floyd used USADA to manipulate testing procedures and protocols.
Example would be when they asked Manny to sign the contract so that Floyd can get a retroactive TUE if Floyd tested positive for something on the prohibited list. Furthermore, Floyd/USADA wouldn't even need to let Manny and NSAC know about it!!!
- Both have said that they must be innocent since they passed all their tests.
- Both had su****ious test results.
- Both camps consulted with PED experts. Memo for Floyd.
- Both used laughable excuses as reasons why they wanted what was on the prohibited list. Especially Floyd.
- UIC said that Lance is an outstanding representative of his sport and doesn't need to be investigated. UIC and Lance had colluded on the PEDs front. NSAC said something very similar about the Nevada boxer named Floyd.
.Last edited by ADP02; 11-01-2015, 02:40 AM.
Comment
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostWrong again. How many chances to we need to give you guys? Hauser wrote about Manny too and said that he should have just postponed the fight.
Funny how you are trying to connect the dots with everything except what's in front of you.
Start with why was Manny quickly thrown under the bus by the NSAC and even by USADA for that mistaken checkbox to the point that they quickly said that it must be investigated. For Floyd, nope. Floyd had a medical condition, used IVs, took his vitamins with an IV but didn't let the NSAC know about it. Why the difference? Especially when Floyd actually did something that was on the prohibited list!!! Especially if NSAC said that the whole thing was not on the up and up. "UNACCEPTABLE" - said NSAC
Come on, even Ray Charles can see the similarities between Lance and Floyd.
Start with this:
- Like Lance, Floyd delayed testing for 5+ hours at least on 2 occasions.
- Both used something that was on the prohibited List.
- Like Lance, Floyd used USADA to manipulate the testing process.
- Both used IVs.
- Both had their representatives give large sums of money to those in charge of their sport in one form or another. UIC/USADA. USADA ironically called it "conflict of interest" when Lance did it.
- Both took something that was on the prohibited List then later requested it be approved after the fact.
- Like Lance used UIC, Floyd used USADA to manipulate testing procedures and protocols.
Example would be when they asked Manny to sign the contract so that Floyd can get a retroactive TUE if Floyd tested positive for something on the prohibited list. Furthermore, Floyd/USADA wouldn't even need to let Manny and NSAC know about it!!!
- Both have said that they must be innocent since they passed all their tests.
- Both had su****ious test results.
- Both camps consulted with PED experts. Memo for Floyd.
- Both used laughable excuses as reasons why they wanted what was on the prohibited list. Especially Floyd.
- UIC said that Lance is an outstanding representative of his sport and doesn't need to be investigated. UIC and Lance had colluded on the PEDs front. NSAC said something very similar about the Nevada boxer named Floyd.
.
But on the issue of Lance --
"One USADA supporter asked, 'Why would we go after an American hero, a cancer survivor (Armstrong) and not go after Public Enemy No. 1?' a reference to Mayweather’s domestic violence history and boastful style that has made him a sporting villain.
Keep in mind that Lance's net worth is over 100 million dollars.
Comment
Originally posted by travestyny View PostI think NSAC got over it when all the facts came out. Maybe it's time that you did as well.
But on the issue of Lance --
"One USADA supporter asked, 'Why would we go after an American hero, a cancer survivor (Armstrong) and not go after Public Enemy No. 1?' a reference to Mayweather’s domestic violence history and boastful style that has made him a sporting villain.
Keep in mind that Lance's net worth is over 100 million dollars.
Floyd might have said, if I can't make them love me, make them hate me. He took his knowledge of Pro Wrestling, his knowledge of Big Jack Johnson, and might have said, I am gonna make my haters hate me so much, they are gonna buy my fights hoping I lose.
Beat the best. Build up to the big big fight, control all negotiations, get paid and get paid.
Comment
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostWrong again. How many chances to we need to give you guys? Hauser wrote about Manny too and said that he should have just postponed the fight.
Funny how you are trying to connect the dots with everything except what's in front of you.
Start with why was Manny quickly thrown under the bus by the NSAC and even by USADA for that mistaken checkbox to the point that they quickly said that it must be investigated. For Floyd, nope. Floyd had a medical condition, used IVs, took his vitamins with an IV but didn't let the NSAC know about it. Why the difference? Especially when Floyd actually did something that was on the prohibited list!!! Especially if NSAC said that the whole thing was not on the up and up. "UNACCEPTABLE" - said NSAC
Come on, even Ray Charles can see the similarities between Lance and Floyd.
Start with this:
- Like Lance, Floyd delayed testing for 5+ hours at least on 2 occasions.
- Both used something that was on the prohibited List.
- Like Lance, Floyd used USADA to manipulate the testing process.
- Both used IVs.
- Both had their representatives give large sums of money to those in charge of their sport in one form or another. UIC/USADA. USADA ironically called it "conflict of interest" when Lance did it.
- Both took something that was on the prohibited List then later requested it be approved after the fact.
- Like Lance used UIC, Floyd used USADA to manipulate testing procedures and protocols.
Example would be when they asked Manny to sign the contract so that Floyd can get a retroactive TUE if Floyd tested positive for something on the prohibited list. Furthermore, Floyd/USADA wouldn't even need to let Manny and NSAC know about it!!!
- Both have said that they must be innocent since they passed all their tests.
- Both had su****ious test results.
- Both camps consulted with PED experts. Memo for Floyd.
- Both used laughable excuses as reasons why they wanted what was on the prohibited list. Especially Floyd.
- UIC said that Lance is an outstanding representative of his sport and doesn't need to be investigated. UIC and Lance had colluded on the PEDs front. NSAC said something very similar about the Nevada boxer named Floyd.
.
Next year free PAC-O-LANTERN for you..... Very dimly lit... Just like PAC...
Comment
Comment