Still nobody is capable of providing the simple plot as to how you mask ''illegal substances'' for Floyd's testing.
There are only the following scenarios as to why:
1). Tests are negative. Never has there been a situation for an event with May & Pac testing that can provide an example as to how one would ''dope'' via 750ml.
2). There are methods to 1). If Conte or any expert provides a scenario as to how to do this effectively then it becomes a paradoxical contradiction in sports, because a FACT has proven a definite method over anti-doping techniques, and thus, would supersede any rule and change the rules for WADA's code. This scenario would also detail any athlete's ability to mask ''something'' within 24hrs over the most detailed type of anti-dope testing. Hence, ''anti-dope'' testing.
3). Without substantial evidence or proof for blood results, Hauser is challenging WADA accredited lab testing, which also includes accredited laboratories that even VADA complies to.
4). If it were an actual story, it is poor journalism from various angles not being covered, especially the losing side. The best bet to stir controversy is to hire a third party writer and public domain to stir voice.
5). Floyd Mayweather Jr. is Hauser's priority to discredit. The highest paid athlete, the p4p king in boxing for years, and undisputed and bonafide boxer... Same goes with Top Rank. They would try their upmost best to discredit Floyd at all costs.
6). This is the best fiction one can do in the essence of racially motivated targeting.
7.) Just as people say there was 15 times more the ''amount'' is the same as the amount not present in sports journalism as a story. This isn't a random athlete. It's Floyd Mayweather Jr. Media journalism didn't start this year...
Sadly, ''15 times'' the amount and referring to fluid body weight.... it surprises me how many people are suckered from one writer's approach. That social experiment is a prime example on how people eat politics for any global or local case in news gathering.
There are only the following scenarios as to why:
1). Tests are negative. Never has there been a situation for an event with May & Pac testing that can provide an example as to how one would ''dope'' via 750ml.
2). There are methods to 1). If Conte or any expert provides a scenario as to how to do this effectively then it becomes a paradoxical contradiction in sports, because a FACT has proven a definite method over anti-doping techniques, and thus, would supersede any rule and change the rules for WADA's code. This scenario would also detail any athlete's ability to mask ''something'' within 24hrs over the most detailed type of anti-dope testing. Hence, ''anti-dope'' testing.
3). Without substantial evidence or proof for blood results, Hauser is challenging WADA accredited lab testing, which also includes accredited laboratories that even VADA complies to.
4). If it were an actual story, it is poor journalism from various angles not being covered, especially the losing side. The best bet to stir controversy is to hire a third party writer and public domain to stir voice.
5). Floyd Mayweather Jr. is Hauser's priority to discredit. The highest paid athlete, the p4p king in boxing for years, and undisputed and bonafide boxer... Same goes with Top Rank. They would try their upmost best to discredit Floyd at all costs.
6). This is the best fiction one can do in the essence of racially motivated targeting.
7.) Just as people say there was 15 times more the ''amount'' is the same as the amount not present in sports journalism as a story. This isn't a random athlete. It's Floyd Mayweather Jr. Media journalism didn't start this year...
Sadly, ''15 times'' the amount and referring to fluid body weight.... it surprises me how many people are suckered from one writer's approach. That social experiment is a prime example on how people eat politics for any global or local case in news gathering.
Comment