Originally posted by Rath
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Rath View Postwe both agree that Pac lost May 2nd.
you are barking at the wrong tree, i am not a Pac fan like most Floyd fans believed i am.
it is easier to debate, irritates, annoys, insults, floyd fans using Pac than any other fighter. you as a human behaviorist should know that.
how do you think i would fare if i am a judah fan?
now exactly what is your point?
Judah fan, okay....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zaroku View PostGreat post. Thanks for your much needed input.
Best regards,
Zaroku
Floyd, the A side, was allowed to twist their rules to fit his needs. This is known.
Secondly, there have been critics of USADA's handling of boxing. Hauser, Conte and many others including NSAC!
The thing is that if you check what WADA states, Floyd should not have had an IV because WADA states that even IF Floyd was crazy enough to do a long grueling intense workout, the preferred method to rehydrate would still be orally.
Keep in mind that even Wada knows that dehydration for an athlete happens right after a tough long workout. Now add that to what Floyd used as an excuse. Meaning, there was no alternative explanation used by Floyd besides "workout" and "giving blood".
So, lets be real for a second. Floyd wasn't even doing a tough long workout at that point(May 1st). It would actually hurt Floyd not help Floyd by doing that and we know that Floyd is no rookie when it comes to training.
Plus, there was the NSAC doctor who examined Floyd at that point in time and did not see Floyd dehydrated. Maybe that is why Floyd avoided stating that he was dehydrated on his prefight form and/or didn't state that to the NSAC doctor. The NSAC doctor would have disagreed with Floyd's form or conclude "Your lucky Floyd because I can clear you of that diagnosis. You are no longer dehydrated"
WADA states the following:
"[B]The use of IV infusions in sport is commonly linked with rehydration after exhaustive effort, and this situation is arguably the major cause of debate.[/B]
It must be understood that the use of IV fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild to moderate dehydration is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. There is a well-established body of scientific evidence to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice, potentially even more effective than IV infusion."
.Last edited by ADP02; 10-17-2015, 01:11 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostMaybe you are being sarcastic with that poster. Not sure.
Floyd, the A side, was allowed to twist their rules to fit his needs. This is known.
Secondly, there have been critics of USADA's handling of boxing. Hauser, Conte and many others including NSAC!
The thing is that if you check what WADA states, Floyd should not have had an IV because WADA states that even IF Floyd was crazy enough to do a long grueling intense workout, the preferred method to rehydrate would still be orally.
Keep in mind that even Wada knows that dehydration for an athlete happens right after a tough long workout. Now add that to what Floyd used as an excuse. Meaning, there was no alternative explanation used by Floyd besides "workout" and "giving blood".
So, lets be real for a second. Floyd wasn't even doing a tough long workout at that point(May 1st). It would actually hurt Floyd not help Floyd by doing that and we know that Floyd is no rookie when it comes to training.
Plus, there was the NSAC doctor who examined Floyd at that point in time and did not see Floyd dehydrated. Maybe that is why Floyd avoided stating that he was dehydrated on his prefight form and/or didn't state that to the NSAC doctor. The NSAC doctor would have disagreed with Floyd's form or conclude "Your lucky Floyd because I can clear you of that diagnosis. You are no longer dehydrated"
WADA states the following:
"[B]The use of IV infusions in sport is commonly linked with rehydration after exhaustive effort, and this situation is arguably the major cause of debate.[/B]
It must be understood that the use of IV fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild to moderate dehydration is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. There is a well-established body of scientific evidence to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice, potentially even more effective than IV infusion."
.
Comment
-
Originally posted by torosboxing75 View PostYou know Floyd groupies hate these facts.
When we present them with facts, they just deflect and/or play dumb.
It makes you wonder at what happened to all the Floyd fans that had that enquiring mind on this subject (for 5+ years). They all got amnesia or something.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spoon23 View PostA black dude telling the truth. Homey knows what's up!
All you Pac fans need to move to Tokyo. Come join me and together we will sing Disney songs on boxing website. Let it gooooo, let it goooooooo
Comment
Comment