Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Zaroku View Post
    I bash them both. In my opinion, not legally binding, Floyd is full of ****.
    I believe Marquez cheated, yoked like that, I believe PAC used to roids too.

    Thanks for the course correction.

    Really. I tend to fight the extreme fans individually, and not the core problem at hand.
    IV thread right, TUE nearly 3 weeks later. If I channel my love and respect for Sanchez, guilty. The game is out of control and dirty beyond belief.
    Guilty.
    But every post on this thread it's you bashing pac and defending Floyd. Not once in this thread which is about Floyds IV scandal have you come down on him.

    Comment


      Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
      when I'm done thinking about it, I will let him know.
      Sure, take your time but all you need to remember is why you came to a different conclusion already.

      Comment


        Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
        So how did Floyd "juice?"
        PEDs, juice, roids. It's all the same. If you are holding on to the opinion that he didn't do it. Great but there is way way way more evidence that he did it and evidence that he is clean.

        Comment


          Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
          Sure, take your time but all you need to remember is why you came to a different conclusion already.
          there is a big difference between reaching different conclusions and being wrong. His points have merit-unlike yours, spoon23. rath or any of the other cast of disgruntled Manny fans.

          Upon reflection I might find that he is 100% correct. When I am finished reflecting, I will let him know.

          Comment


            Comment


              Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
              Sure, take your time but all you need to remember is why you came to a different conclusion already.
              What is your point? Big Dunn has authority over who? He doesn't have to agree with my perspective on Hauser an you're judging his pov out of context, from what?

              "Floyd showed no signs of [b]significant[/[b] dehydration." So in other words Floyd showed signs of mild dehydration? Are boxers technically dehydrated at weigh in? To what degree, to who's subjectivity? Rehydration to fight night weight corresponds to who's measure when evaluating "dehydration" or not?

              Any angle you look at it, Hauser has admitted that Floyd was dehydrated, to what degree, who cares, to Hauser, he wasn't significantly dehydrated?

              How come the BWAA or Ring ****zine haven't said anything about De La Hoya's dehydration against Pac. You can find videos of Roach on seconds out where he brags that Dela Hoya was dehydrated and he saw the IV marks on his arm, he then goes on to literally saying there's nothing wrong or illegal about it?

              Do you know why? Because for years Top Rank has verbally given a pattern, including ESPNs Dan Rafael, that the NSAC has always been good enough, even though as of late Margaret Goodman (CEO) of VADA states that the commissions don't do it right.

              Therefore anything out of the status quo in boxing for drug testing is public enemy number one. And who has been saying for years to make it better? Two Olympians, Khan and Floyd, both stating Olympic Style Drug Testing, hence blood. Not 365. Nobody talks 365 as if the boxing world has rinsed Donaire as the defacto.

              49-0 baby!
              Last edited by Lester Tutor; 10-15-2015, 01:26 PM.

              Comment


                Originally posted by boxinghead530 View Post
                But every post on this thread it's you bashing pac and defending Floyd. Not once in this thread which is about Floyds IV scandal have you come down on him.

                Thank you. My gut feeling post. Not like the posts where I pound PAC fans. If any PAC fan would have approached me logically, as you have,
                I personally think Floyd's ex post facto TUE is bull crap. Invalidating his 8 rds to 4 win over PAC man!

                I think you kinda get me, ask me the right question, don't come with generic diatribe and I promise to give you my honest answer.

                This is why I feel you get me in some way. I join you. I must add this disclaimer.

                I bet my money. Hard earned cash! Castillo 1 taught me that even if Floyd should lose in the ring, if he is not knocked out, he wins. I lost money, betting against him. I hate losing money. Postol korned me, my mistake for underestimating him & betting against him. Boxing is dirty, and I know it, but I always ask myself two questions?
                1. Can I change it, can I clean up boxing???
                2. How can I make money betting boxing????

                Floyd is now hanging out with true players, warren buffet, etc, guys that have donated more money than he has ever made. Big big boss players. Hope he learns from them, only $$$green matters, sad as that is to state.

                I join you. A cheat is a cheat.

                My question, how can we change it????
                Best regards
                zaroku

                P.s. I voted
                It was to make sure no one else was doping so HE could
                Last edited by Zaroku; 10-15-2015, 01:36 PM.

                Comment


                  Comment


                    Originally posted by boxinghead530 View Post
                    PEDs, juice, roids. It's all the same. If you are holding on to the opinion that he didn't do it. Great but there is way way way more evidence that he did it and evidence that he is clean.
                    Really, it's all the same? I thought "cheating" had nothing to do wih PEDs! So, I ask again, how did Floyd do it?! How did Floyd mask it?! Don't forget to provide the substance as well! Popcorn ready.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
                      there is a big difference between reaching different conclusions and being wrong. His points have merit-unlike yours, spoon23. rath or any of the other cast of disgruntled Manny fans.

                      Upon reflection I might find that he is 100% correct. When I am finished reflecting, I will let him know.
                      Sure. reflect, deflect, ..... its just a difference of one letter.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP