Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
    I scored it 8-4 Mayweather.
    I'll bite. Then why are you so upset about Manny's failure in the biggest fight of his career?

    Comment


      Originally posted by Rath View Post
      give me the name of the doctor who signed Floyd medical report that says Floyd was dehydrated
      What's the name of the USADA officer(s)? What's the name of the Paramedic? Can we see the needle that was used? Can we see the MRI of Pacquiao's shoulder injury that proves he had injury before fight?

      -- Rath

      Comment


        Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
        Strange, you have about 100 pages crying about 750ml.. yet you don't have the balls to come up with a rational answer for May 1st to May 2nd. I'm glad you and the rest dodge the IV beneficial scenario. Good job, son!
        what's strange is that not a single Floyd fan can provide the name of the authorized doctor who signed and affirmed on medical report that Floyd was indeed dehydrated

        Comment


          why is this thread 21 pages but threads pertaining to active fighters is only 3-9?

          Comment


            Originally posted by radioraheem View Post
            So yes, passing of the test is indeed proof
            Nope simple phrased in such a way as to trick ****** people like you. The incomplete sample provided is insignificant would be diluted by the later post IV sample.

            The wording used by USADA was cleverly phrased so a dumb**** like you would reach the wrong conclusion that he was tested both before and after.

            Face it radio. Every clever manipulation USADA used you ****ing fell for. You believed that they had turned over Mayweathers test results too because they said

            "This is inaccurate. USADA produced a total of 2,695 pages of documents in response to the subpoena from Mr. Pacquiao’s legal counsel.”

            But that doesn't actually say they turned over the test results. It is simply written so that you would assume that is what they meant. In short they know that there are plenty of people as ****** as you are. This "response" was written for dumb ****s like you.

            As Hauser so easily shows USADA was actually fighting the subpena for the records in court and never produced them.

            But it withheld other documents and, on June 22, 2012, filed a motion to quash the subpoena, arguing, "First, the requested documents include medical records and documentation relating to Mr. Mayweather Jr which may constitute confidential medical records requiring his consent and release. Second, the requested documents include documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine and/or the investigative privilege. Third, the subpoena purports to require production in Los Angeles, California, more than 100 miles from USADA's offices and the location of the requested documents."

            USADA’s motion to quash was never ruled upon by the court because the case was settled by the payment of an undisclosed sum of money by Mayweather to Pacquiao. It would be interesting to review the documents that USADA did not produce.
            So I read USADA's response correctly and you totally read it incorrectly.

            In short you are ****** and shouldn't be taken seriously at all.

            Comment


              Originally posted by 12TRIBEsRiSe View Post
              why is this thread 21 pages but threads pertaining to active fighters is only 3-9?
              wow what a great observation.

              you really are a very smart person

              and your point is?

              Comment


                Originally posted by 12TRIBEsRiSe View Post
                why is this thread 21 pages but threads pertaining to active fighters is only 3-9?
                PBC. Who wants to talk about some Haymon hypejob v. a tomato can.
                Last edited by GTTofAK; 10-14-2015, 04:09 PM.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Rath View Post
                  what's strange is that not a single Floyd fan can provide the name of the authorized doctor who signed and affirmed on medical report that Floyd was indeed dehydrated
                  Nobody in the United States of America should have their medical records be available to some barefoot third worlder's request because they'd rather deny reality than face the truth.

                  Our grandfathers didn't fight for that, our fathers didnt, we aren't, and neither should our children.

                  Accept reality and move on.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Rath View Post
                    what's strange is that not a single Floyd fan can provide the name of the authorized doctor who signed and affirmed on medical report that Floyd was indeed dehydrated

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by DeadLikeMe View Post
                      I'll bite. Then why are you so upset about Manny's failure in the biggest fight of his career?
                      This isn't about that fight. You only want it to be about that fight because you cant defend Mayweather.

                      Given that I'm very well schooled on teh endocrine system the IV isn't as damaging as the low TE ratio. That is way more damning than the IV before the paquiao fight. At least mayweather can try and argue that he was dehydrated. There is only one explination for two tests showing high end of normal free testosterone and a T/E ratio well below 1. The use of exogenous epitestosterone to mask the use of exogenous testosterone.

                      Short of a major endocrine problem that would preclude Mayweather from being a professional fighter there is no other explanation for the results of those drug tests.

                      edit:
                      Actually even I'm at a loss of any known endocrinological condition that could cause borderline high testosterone and even higher epitestosterone. low testosterone and higher epitestosterone yes but high end of normal testosterone and even higher epitestosterone? No I don't know of any other explanation other than the use of epitestosterone to mask testosterone use.
                      Last edited by GTTofAK; 10-14-2015, 03:54 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP