<#webadvjs#>

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #3571
    Originally posted by boxinghead530 View Post
    Do you think it would have been that easy without PEDs?
    It would've been even easier with.

    Comment

      #3572
      Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
      It would've been even easier with.
      lol, easier without you say?

      Comment

        #3573
        Originally posted by boxinghead530 View Post
        lol, easier without you say?
        Easier with. Learn to read.

        Comment

          #3574
          Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
          Easier with. Learn to read.
          Well it was quite easy for him with. But without what do you say fanboy

          Comment

            #3575
            Originally posted by hardvibes View Post
            An American sports journalist becomes convinced that Lance Armstrong's performances during his tour de france victories are fueled by banned substances. With this conviction, he starts hunting for evidence that will expose Armstrong.

            sounds sooooo familiar

            Looking forward to the Floyd Mayweather version.

            An American sports journalist becomes convinced that Floyd Mayweather's performances during his late 30s victories are fueled by banned substances. With this conviction, he starts hunting for evidence that will expose Mayweather.
            Starring Will Ferrell as Thomas Hauser and Kevin Hart as Floyd Mayweather Jr.



            Coming to theaters in 2017.

            Comment

              #3576
              Originally posted by boxinghead530 View Post
              Well it was quite easy for him with. But without what do you say fanboy
              Erm.....I'll say it slower so you might grasp the simple concepts...

              I said "it would've been easier with". With =/= without.

              Was that easy enough to grasp?

              Comment

                #3577
                Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
                Erm.....I'll say it slower so you might grasp the simple concepts...

                I said "it would've been easier with". With =/= without.

                Was that easy enough to grasp?
                And can you grasp what I'm saying? Or are you such a fanboy you can't grasp it's.

                IT WAS QUITE EASY FOR HIM WITH, but how do you think he fares without? Is that to hard to grasp?

                Comment

                  #3578
                  Originally posted by boxinghead530 View Post
                  And can you grasp what I'm saying? Or are you such a fanboy you can't grasp it's.

                  IT WAS QUITE EASY FOR HIM WITH, but how do you think he fares without? Is that to hard to grasp?

                  Comment

                    #3579
                    Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
                    Lol you fanboys are a riot. Good luck

                    Comment

                      #3580
                      Originally posted by boxinghead530 View Post
                      Lol you fanboys are a riot. Good luck

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP