Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

[GTTofAK]

Slander, opinion, take it as you will

Opinion is not slander.

[IR0NFIST]

Financial and timing issues should be the least of concerns for a non-profit organisation? You must be a comedian.

Again, what did Pacquiao's defamation lawsuit settlement prove years after the fact? Litigation is business, litigation is not for moral victories. Hauser doesn't even make 6 figures.

The term "non-profit" should be used very loosely in regards to USADA, or any organization for that matter. This is a company that Floyd payed 3 times more than the average cost for their service. Neither you, or I could possibly know what they truly make off record.

Concerning the Pacquiao-Floyd lawsuit, has anyone from Floyd's camp accused Pacquiao of using PEDs after the lawsuit was settled? Guess that answers your question.

Once again, the litigation process should be of no concern if USADA is confident that Hauser's claims wouldn't hold up in court, seeing as how the loser of the trail would be the one paying for the litigation cost when all is settled.

[DeadLikeMe]

Do you ******s really believe Floyd schooling Manny is something you can spam away?

[IR0NFIST]

Do you ******s really believe Floyd schooling Manny is something you can spam away?

Do you really believe that Floyd needed 750 ml of saline because he was "severely dehydrated"?

[radioraheem]

The term "non-profit" should be used very loosely in regards to USADA, or any organization for that matter. This is a company that Floyd payed 3 times more than the average cost for their service. Neither you, or I could possibly know what they truly make off record.

Concerning the Pacquiao-Floyd lawsuit, has anyone from Floyd's camp accused Pacquiao of using PEDs after the lawsuit was settled? Guess that answers your question.

Once again, the litigation process should be of no concern if USADA is confident that Hauser's claims wouldn't hold up in court, seeing as how the loser of the trail would be the one paying for the litigation cost when all is settled.

According to Hauser they got paid that. The same Hauser that wrote USADA got paid $36K for testing, then USADA refuted this as false in their report.

And yes, after the settlement, there were members of the Mayweather camp that continued to accuse Pacquiao of PEDs.

And if you think Hauser has the money to pay for the litigation after years have passed, and it's all settled, then you are naive. Again, litigation is business. It's not done for moral victory. It has to make financial sense.

[GTTofAK]

According to Hauser they got paid that. The same Hauser that wrote USADA got paid $36K for testing, then USADA refuted this as false in their report.

If Hauser made false claims on matters of fact like how much they got paid then that is libel. USADA should sue him.

In libel and slander law there are matters of opinion and matters of fact. If you miss state a matter of fact like how much someone got paid with malice then that is libel.

[radioraheem]

I like that you are now calling it a WADA lab. So much for consistency. As for WADA knowing. All lab samples are anonymous. Only the collection agency knows who gave sample '123456'. For the all the lab knows its a random ped test from a high school football team.

USADA doesn't have to control the testers. They have control over who finds out the test results. As in the Morales case they can simply choose not to report positive A and B samples.

Plenty of things USADA can do if you pay them their bribe. They can give you a heads up when the tester is coming. They can grant TUEs like napkins. They can keep your positive test resutls a secrete under confidentiality agreements and simply keep testing you until you come up negative.

And when you are caught red handed they can make up some off the wall story about knowing all along and there being a paramedic or an RN or something.

BALCO obviously didn't pay USADA its bribe.

Anyone can accept a bribe. Thereby, according to such a conspiracy, no one is safe. Please continue with your imagination, it's pretty good.

[radioraheem]

If Hauser made false claims on matters of fact like how much they got paid then that is libel. USADA should sue him.

In libel and slander law there are matters of opinion and matters of fact. If you miss state a matter of fact like how much someone got paid with malice then that is libel.

Says who? You? It's your belief, your opinion that they should sue.

[GTTofAK]

Anyone can accept a bribe. Thereby, according to such a conspiracy, no one is safe. Please continue with your imagination, it's pretty good.

Fact USADA is a non-profit.

Fact all non profits balance sheets have to be 0 at the end.

Fact any excess money has to go back to the cost structure.

Fact there are no USADA charities.

Fact one of the main ways such a non-profit balances is with bonuses to its executives.

If you pay them $150,000 for $30,000 worth of work who do you think gets the extra?

[GTTofAK]

Says who? You? It's your belief, your opinion that they should sue.

If they claim that Hauser made a false claim of fact. Then they should sue. Its textbook libel.