Who has the better resume and accomplished the most in the sport GGG or Khan

[Robbie Barrett]

Khan has the better resume right now, but what's the actual point of this thread larryx? Because in no way, shape, or form, does that support any argument that Khan is in any way, shape, or form better than GGG, because he isn't. He never was, and he never could be. And GGG can add much more to his resume than Khan can at this stage in their careers. So I hope this isn't some thread intended to take shots at GGG, or overrate Khan.

Golovkin is 33, Khan 28. Khan's division is stacked, Golovkin's isn't.

[BrometheusBob.]

Khan is much younger then GGG is he not?

I think you might be forgetting something

[Chuckguy]

Larry and his agendas lmfao
Of course khan has a better resume what's your fawking point?
Your boyfriend still won't fight either! Ha
You should start a there's who makes Floyd sh it his pants faster
Khan or GGG

[soul_survivor]

Post and discuss....

Khan by a huge margin, this isn't even a close run thing. Khan's resume is one of the best for any fighter under 30.

But it's misleading question larry, cos GGG is the guy who is better overall in terms of the eye test but he is in a dead division. Khan's lucky enough to have fought at 135, 140 and 147.

[LoadedWraps]

Golovkin is 33, Khan 28. Khan's division is stacked, Golovkin's isn't.

Irrelevant really when you consider that Golovkin's star power stock goes up every day, his skillset and style lend for exciting fights, and his biggest fights are yet to come. Golovkin is an exciting fighter who is being groomed as a superstar and has the tools and intangibles to be the p4p king if he doesn't have major setbacks and the right fights are made. Khan has peaked stock-wise barring a major win, and the fact that he has a glass chin, notable losses, and a big mouth make that type of signature win improbable. Even if he lands the biggests fights he will lose them, possibly by stoppage, the chances of that happening to Golovkin are minute.

And Khan has been a pro for longer and has gotten bigger fights sooner and faced better competition because of his hype coming into the sport and his exciting style, that's very different from the supposed "hype" Golovkin has, who has draw because of results, there wasn't a pre-hype to live up to for him, it's always been about proving his worth and going to work. Of course you can't compare resumes in that sense, look at a fighter like Lomachenko for example. He is the real deal, and had tremendous hype because of his amateur pedigree and thus has landed big fights early on, a fighter without that kind of expectation takes years, and 15-20 fights to land the same names. You can't ignore facts like that when you want to play the resume game. Not everyone reaches the same level at the same pace but that doesn't tell us who is the better fighter or who should be ranked higher p4p.

[BrometheusBob.]

Irrelevant really when you consider that Golovkin's star power stock goes up every day, his skillset and style lend for exciting fights, and his biggest fights are yet to come. Golovkin is an exciting fighter who is being groomed as a superstar and has the tools and intangibles to be the p4p king if he doesn't have major setbacks and the right fights are made. Khan has peaked stock-wise barring a major win, and the fact that he has a glass chin, notable losses, and a big mouth make that type of signature win improbable. Even if he lands the biggests fights he will lose them, possibly by stoppage, the chances of that happening to Golovkin are minute.

And Khan has been a pro for longer and has gotten bigger fights sooner and faced better competition because of his hype coming into the sport and his exciting style, that's very different from the supposed "hype" Golovkin has, who has draw because of results, there wasn't a pre-hype to live up to for him, it's always been about proving his worth and going to work. Of course you can't compare resumes in that sense, look at a fighter like Lomachenko for example. He is the real deal, and had tremendous hype because of his amateur pedigree and thus has landed big fights early on, a fighter without that kind of expectation takes years, and 15-20 fights to land the same names. You can't ignore facts like that when you want to play the resume game. Not everyone reaches the same level at the same pace but that doesn't tell us who is the better fighter or who should be ranked higher p4p.

RIP this thread. LoadedWraps went in on it.

[RINGG]

accomplished the most - Golovkin
better resume - Khan

[Beater_of_ass]

What does it matter? GGG clearly is the much better fighter.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

accomplished the most - Golovkin
better resume - Khan

Golovkin has accomplished ****

[VG_Addict]

Khan has the better resume, but Golovkin is MUCH more skilled.