I'm gonna vote for GGG, and if you feel otherwise feel free to refer to the many P4P lists that have GGG higher than Khan (aka literally any P4P list).
I don't even see how it is comparable, I'm picking GGG.
GGG has bulldozed champions and former champs with relative ease, in most instances rarely giving a round away with maybe the exception of Monroe.
I mean seriously when was his last noteworthy win against a really credible opponent ? Maidana Judah ?
GGG has at no point beaten a champion, The WBa belt he picked up as an Interim belt from Nunez before being promoted. His WBC belt he picked from Rubio and its an interim belt.
The only former champions he has beaten are Kassim Ouma (at 154 and hasn't been champion since 2005), Daniel Geale (losses to Barker and Cotto recently.
I'm gonna vote for GGG, and if you feel otherwise feel free to refer to the many P4P lists that have GGG higher than Khan (aka literally any P4P list).
The question isn't who is the better fighter but who has fought the better fighters. There is no argument.
Khan has the better resume right now, but what's the actual point of this thread larryx? Because in no way, shape, or form, does that support any argument that Khan is in any way, shape, or form better than GGG, because he isn't. He never was, and he never could be. And GGG can add much more to his resume than Khan can at this stage in their careers. So I hope this isn't some thread intended to take shots at GGG, or overrate Khan.
Khan has the better resume right now, but what's the actual point of this thread larryx? Because in no way, shape, or form, does that support any argument that Khan is in any way, shape, or form better than GGG, because he isn't. He never was, and he never could be. And GGG can add much more to his resume than Khan can at this stage in their careers. So I hope this isn't some thread intended to take shots at GGG, or overrate Khan.
Comment