Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who has the better resume and accomplished the most in the sport GGG or Khan

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    of course khan.
    if you scaled khan up to 160, cotto wouldve fought him twice already.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by John Locke View Post
      lol why do you ask questions you know the answer to?
      it's larry's way of diminishing ggg's success

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by nivek535 View Post
        it's larry's way of diminishing ggg's success
        Success lol

        Comment


          #14
          OP be like




          I'm gonna vote for GGG, and if you feel otherwise feel free to refer to the many P4P lists that have GGG higher than Khan (aka literally any P4P list).
          Last edited by BrometheusBob.; 08-20-2015, 02:50 PM.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Scott-Weiland View Post
            I don't even see how it is comparable, I'm picking GGG.

            GGG has bulldozed champions and former champs with relative ease, in most instances rarely giving a round away with maybe the exception of Monroe.

            I mean seriously when was his last noteworthy win against a really credible opponent ? Maidana Judah ?
            Golovkin has never fought a champion.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Scott-Weiland View Post
              I don't even see how it is comparable, I'm picking GGG.

              GGG has bulldozed champions and former champs with relative ease, in most instances rarely giving a round away with maybe the exception of Monroe.

              I mean seriously when was his last noteworthy win against a really credible opponent ? Maidana Judah ?
              GGG has at no point beaten a champion, The WBa belt he picked up as an Interim belt from Nunez before being promoted. His WBC belt he picked from Rubio and its an interim belt.

              The only former champions he has beaten are Kassim Ouma (at 154 and hasn't been champion since 2005), Daniel Geale (losses to Barker and Cotto recently.

              I think that is literally it. Nowhere near Khan.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by BrometheusBob View Post
                OP be like




                I'm gonna vote for GGG, and if you feel otherwise feel free to refer to the many P4P lists that have GGG higher than Khan (aka literally any P4P list).
                The question isn't who is the better fighter but who has fought the better fighters. There is no argument.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Scott-Weiland View Post
                  I don't even see how it is comparable, I'm picking GGG.

                  GGG has bulldozed champions and former champs with relative ease, in most instances rarely giving a round away with maybe the exception of Monroe.

                  I mean seriously when was his last noteworthy win against a really credible opponent ? Maidana Judah ?
                  Lemieux is the first reigning champion that Golovkin has faced. He got handed his title, which was an interim title if I remember correctly.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by LarryXXX View Post
                    Post and discuss....
                    Khan has the better resume right now, but what's the actual point of this thread larryx? Because in no way, shape, or form, does that support any argument that Khan is in any way, shape, or form better than GGG, because he isn't. He never was, and he never could be. And GGG can add much more to his resume than Khan can at this stage in their careers. So I hope this isn't some thread intended to take shots at GGG, or overrate Khan.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by LoadedWraps View Post
                      Khan has the better resume right now, but what's the actual point of this thread larryx? Because in no way, shape, or form, does that support any argument that Khan is in any way, shape, or form better than GGG, because he isn't. He never was, and he never could be. And GGG can add much more to his resume than Khan can at this stage in their careers. So I hope this isn't some thread intended to take shots at GGG, or overrate Khan.
                      Khan is much younger then GGG is he not?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP