Originally posted by jas
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
After beating Joe Frazier and George Foreman in 74, Ali fought Chuck Wepner
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by ***1048;ATAS View PostIf Ali is so much better than Floyd doesn't that make him fighting Chuck Wepner even worse?
Wepner was awful, man. As bad as the heavyweight division is now, he wouldn't even make top 50. When Foreman only had 3 total pro fights, he knocked out Wepner in a couple of rounds. That's how bad he was, just some guy very young guys fight in their first few matches.
Floyd would have to comeback and fight Triple G at middleweight (no cw) and that still wouldnt make him comparable to Ali
Ali was a man, who fought in a tough era, who had a extremely tough life, with social and economical odds stacked against him
Also Foreman was favoured to beat Ali. Floyd went in as favourite against Manny. Foreman was a killer, a man in his prime, Manny was a over the hill boxer who had been put to sleep by JMM.
You sick freak, how dare you compare a woman beating thug, with a small penis to a God like Ali...how bloody dare you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by b d w View PostHere is the problem with this comparison. Ali fought 4 times in 1975. When you are fighting 4 times in a year you are allowed a soft touch fight. Not when you are only fighting twice a year.
The only other problem is as mentioned is the money. If you are making the type of money Floyd is and CHARGING the Fans the type of money Showtime is then you have to do better than this ****.
The last problem is this is supposedly Floyd's last fight. If that is the case and he is TBE as he claims to be then he should be shooting for greatness in his last fight not taking a 'stay busy' type fight, especially as Floyd isn't a guy that has taken a lot of damage over his career.
Put in the context above this fight is garbage.
Comment
-
Great post. Still can't act like I give any f#cks about this fight, but for the people hating super strong just go look at some of the great fighters of past eras & see what they did. Lotsa soft touches, lotsa oddly timed opposition, lotsa fights you wouldn't have been a fan of back then if you were around.
Comment
-
Originally posted by FrankieBruno View Postand look how many ATG's and legends Ali fought after Chuck Wepner
Floyd would have to comeback and fight Triple G at middleweight (no cw) and that still wouldnt make him comparable to Ali
Ali was a man, who fought in a tough era, who had a extremely tough life, with social and economical odds stacked against him
Also Foreman was favoured to beat Ali. Floyd went in as favourite against Manny. Foreman was a killer, a man in his prime, Manny was a over the hill boxer who had been put to sleep by JMM.
You sick freak, how dare you compare a woman beating thug, with a small penis to a God like Ali...how bloody dare you.
This topic isn't debating who is greater, it's merely stating fights like Berto & Wepner aren't all that crazy and in fact are pretty common practice after big fights throughout boxing history.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ***1048;ATAS View PostThis isn't helping your case on how Chuck Wepner was an acceptable opponent. Or Joe Bugner who followed.
This topic isn't debating who is greater, it's merely stating fights like Berto & Wepner aren't all that crazy and in fact are pretty common practice after big fights throughout boxing history.
Did Ali have any big fights after Wepner?
Comment
-
Not the same thing. Wepner was a top 10 heavy at the time, and when he fought Wepner, Ali had beaten 6 of the other 8 men in the rankings. He then took on Lyle who was also in the top ten rankings. Ali took risks, he took on all kinds of fighters with different styles and was the man in the golden age of heavyweight prize fighting.
Also this wasn't a pay per view fight, now that term was foreign back then, but the fact that Mayweather actually expects people to pay 75 bucks for this mismatch with a lackluster undercard is borderline insane.
Comment
-
Even if it is Floyd's last fight which is certainly questionable, like every fighter goes out worse and generally speaking much worse (looking at you Roy Jones).
Who is the last really excellent fighter that retired on a big fight that they won? Lenox Lewis?
Retiring on a soft touch is not an ideal way to go out, but who really goes out on a high note in this sport?
Comment
-
Originally posted by ***1048;ATAS View PostThis isn't helping your case on how Chuck Wepner was an acceptable opponent. Or Joe Bugner who followed.
This topic isn't debating who is greater, it's merely stating fights like Berto & Wepner aren't all that crazy and in fact are pretty common practice after big fights throughout boxing history.
If you are going to compare, you have to compare everything, you cant pick and choose ur arguments
You are a typical Floyd nuthugger, who will gloss over the facts.
Soon as you compared Ali to Floyd, you opened up a can of worms..
Ali fought a man who he was suppose to lose to, according to the odds and public opinion, a man who was in his prime, a real life hard hitting killer.
Manny doesnt fit the profile of George Foreman.
Floyd has had it relatively easy throughout his career, avoided all the beasts and when he did fight a beast, it was 5 years too late and the beast was a pussieecat because JMM had already tamed him
Comment
Comment