Originally posted by Rath
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: De La Hoya Feels Bayless as Ref Favors Mayweather
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Rath View Postyou are not confuse, a genius don't get confuse specially the meaning of excessive
Excessive holding for your information means Floyd was tying up his opponent just one time in 12 rounds but he hold them up for 20 minutes.
so you were right it was not excessive since Floyd only hold them up 20 times for just 10 seconds or less. you really is a genius.
jack ass. you say ha ha ha ha ha
Comment
-
Originally posted by BuckToothed View PostI'm fine with Bayless, but he did call a slip in the Pac/Mosley fight a KD and tried to break up Floyd/Maidana when Floyd was put on ***** street.
Comment
-
Pacquiao fans too ****** to realise that a referee like Weeks that allows fighters to wrestle and fight inside would be worse for Pacquiao than Bayless. Because Pacquiao has zero inside fighting ability.
Comment
-
TBE= The Bayless Effect
TBE= The Best Elbow
Bayless will allow JR to use his elbow all night long.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by GRUSTLER View PostYou are a JACK ASS because the main reason why Pacquiao fans are crying is because they say Bayless will break up the action too fast instead of letting Pacquiao work inside like the 2nd Maidana fight. Everytime Maidana and Floyd tied up, Bayless broke it up immediately and that's why the excuse was born that Maidana wasn't allowed to fight on the inside due to Bayless. So it's bad that Floyd holds and it's bad that Bayless breaks it up. Bayless not breaking it up would favor him because he is bigger and has a better close up fight game. And the "confuse" statement was a sarcastic remark due to the on going crying about Bayless..... next time I will write sarcasm so you can understand JACK ASS.
i even think that was a genius thinking on your part.
what does excessive holding means again?
what's excessive holding means again? sorry i forgot
you contradicted me saying something about "confuse" and you are talking about being sarcastic
but you forgot to contradict me saying you are a "genius"yet you are talking about sarcasm?
want me to insert sarcasm here too?Last edited by Rath; 04-22-2015, 08:03 AM.
Comment
-
Comment