Official Floyd Mayweather- Manny Pacquiao Postfight aftermath discussion

[V.WEBB]

smiling, is a wrong answer, it was not on the choices.

see how logic works. BOY

You're a clown.

You can't understand how a fighter can throw less than their opponent yet land more than their opponent.

Scram.

Keep barking up the "Floyd hasn't been testing and Manny has been testing 234 times already" tree.

That suits you better.

[The Big Dunn]

Still no counter points, and you are just a Floyd fanboy, not a boxing fan.

I wonder if Floyd will be so out of idea on May 2nd as you are now?

Sorry, your history tells us that if you make a point, it is BS and therefore doesn't require a counter. your opinion isn't relevant. you made a thread and stated jabs do not count. You saying I'm not a boxing fan means nothing.

[hugh grant]

Pac will likely win this fight on points. Floyd will be unable to lift himself that bit extra from the outset as he knows even if he beats Pac, he will get less credit than JMM did, and he is beating a Pac who has the same ko percentage as himself now.

[Rath]

You're a clown.

You can't understand how a fighter can throw less than their opponent yet land more than their opponent.

Scram.

Keep barking up the "Floyd hasn't been testing and Manny has been testing 234 times already" tree.

That suits you better.

Floyd throws 500 landed 300
Pac throws 1000 landed 450

does your argument still rings true?

where will the statement throwing less landing more (than his opponents) fits?

[The Big Dunn]

Floyd throws 500 landed 300
Pac throws 1000 landed 450

does your argument still rings true?

where will the statement throwing less landing more (than his opponents) fits?

not in this example-even though Floyd landed at the higher percentage, 60% to 45%.

Floyd throws 600 lands 400
Pac throws 1000 and lands 350

Its not that difficult to comprehend.

[V.WEBB]

Floyd throws 500 landed 300
Pac throws 1000 landed 450

does your argument still rings true?

where will the statement throwing less landing more (than his opponents) fits?

You really are thick, aren't you?

Let's do the math though.

If Floyd landed 300 out of 500 shots that means he landed 60% of his punches.

If Manny landed 450 out of 1000 shots that means he landed 45% of his punches.

Which fighter landed more?

[V.WEBB]

Also, Rath, take into account that he hasn't fought Manny yet.

Highly doubt Manny punch numbers will be in the 1000s.

[Rath]

not in this example-even though Floyd landed at the higher percentage, 60% to 45%.

Floyd throws 600 lands 400
Pac throws 1000 and lands 350

Its not that difficult to comprehend.

what you always fail to comprehend is that logic always applies in all cases like

the example i gave about all women has 3 legs

as long as you are a woman you therefore has 3 legs, irregardless of age height weight color of the eyes.

the logic applies.

now, your logic only applies to your example but not on mine because that was the problem with the posters statement he was talking as a matter of factly when actually it was situational given that the example he was talking was Floyd and Pac.

now his logic will work if all floyd and pac fights considered, Floyd always throws less and lands more than Pac

but that was not the case.

now who was scary then?

[Tom Cruise]

Pacquiao's underrated defence broken down

[Rath]

You really are thick, aren't you?

Let's do the math though.

If Floyd landed 300 out of 500 shots that means he landed 60% of his punches.

If Manny landed 450 out of 1000 shots that means he landed 45% of his punches.

Which fighter landed more?

Pac clearly landed more.

your logic is floyd err i mean Flawed

you question should be who has the higher rate/percentage of punch landed.

then the answer would be Floyd.

thick you say