Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Ring P4P rankings: Wladimir Klitschko moved up to #2

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    HWs shouldn't be on the PFP list, it's for the little pples, and if they are Wlad should probably be #1 having faced and beaten the next best in his division, the #1 ranked contender, in 2 of his last 3 fights, one of them in his opponent's back yard.

    For comparison Manny faced the #2 in his division and the #3 in the division below, Floyd faced the #5 in his division in his own backyard then rematched him.
    Last edited by Weebler I; 11-25-2014, 09:56 AM.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Weebler I View Post
      HWs shouldn't be on the PFP list, it's for the little pples, and if they are Wlad should probably be #1 having faced the next best in his division in 2 of his last 3 fights, one of them in his opponent's back yard.
      They're fighters, they should be on there. Mike Tyson was once pound for pound #1.

      Anyway, I have no complaints since that's where Wlad is on my list. Had him at #3 then dropped Ward down and moved Klitschko up. Long, long impressive reign of dominance can't be overlooked although the opposition has been mediocre.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
        They're fighters, they should be on there. Mike Tyson was once pound for pound #1.

        Anyway, I have no complaints since that's where Wlad is on my list. Had him at #3 then dropped Ward down and moved Klitschko up. Long, long impressive reign of dominance can't be overlooked although the opposition has been mediocre.
        It is really hard to argue not having lost in 10 years 8 months or so and successfully defending multiple titles regularly.

        I am fine with him at #2 as well.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
          They're fighters, they should be on there. Mike Tyson was once pound for pound #1.

          Anyway, I have no complaints since that's where Wlad is on my list. Had him at #3 then dropped Ward down and moved Klitschko up. Long, long impressive reign of dominance can't be overlooked although the opposition has been mediocre.
          He was HW champ of the world, the numero uno in the sport of boxing. It means you can beat any man in the world inside the squared circle, and that's the position Wlad holds today. No fictional list needed.

          PFP pales in comparison, made up to give smaller men some attention. They may as well add women boxers to it. It's borne of the same principle.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Weebler I View Post
            HWs shouldn't be on the PFP list, it's for the little pples, and if they are Wlad should probably be #1 having faced and beaten the next best in his division, the #1 ranked contender, in 2 of his last 3 fights, one of them in his opponent's back yard.

            For comparison Manny faced the #2 in his division and the #3 in the division below, Floyd faced the #5 in his division in his own backyard then rematched him.

            Fair point about wlad but I think he belongs.

            Maidana was a beltholder, same as Tim. Maidana actually defeated the titleholder to get his belt before he faced Floyd. You didn't think Tim beat Manny.

            Comment


              #36
              Wow wtf... What a joke. Any p4p rankings without Wlad #1 should not be taken serious. It should be Wlad 1) and Floyd 2)



              The HW champion... In this case, Wlad, is the sole REASON there even is P4P rankings. Wlad beats any fighter on the list and any fighter in the world, across any weight division.... So tell me again how he's not #1??

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by King_ View Post
                Wow wtf... What a joke. Any p4p rankings without Wlad #1 should not be taken serious. It should be Wlad 1) and Floyd 2)



                The HW champion... In this case, Wlad, is the sole REASON there even is P4P rankings. Wlad beats any fighter on the list and any fighter in the world, across any weight division.... So tell me again how he's not #1??
                I guess the theory I've heard is if you shrunk him, he wouldn't be as good.

                LOL.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by jreckoning View Post
                  I guess the theory I've heard is if you shrunk him, he wouldn't be as good.

                  LOL.
                  And then you wake up from your dreams and accept reality



                  LOL.


                  Comment


                    #39
                    I've had Wlad at 2 or 3 for years already. We know why people are actually upset on here though

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by Russian Crushin View Post
                      Algeri's close win over Ruslan was better than anything Pulev has done in his entire career.

                      Vlad is one of the best, but to be ahead of Pac? No way. I would also put Roman Gonzalez a head of him
                      What? Algieri's resume does not hold up with Pulev's resume of Thompson, Ustinov and Dimitrienko. Old Thompson is a much better win than beating Provodnikov.

                      And Wlad isn't going around getting put to sleep by anyone, especially not no LHW's coming up in weight. And Wlad isn't making Cruisers come up in weight to fight him. He's fighting top 10 HW's. Pac's fighting top 10 JWWs at 147 and catchweights. If anything, Pac is too high, not Wlad.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP