Originally posted by Ray Corso
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New Ring P4P rankings: Wladimir Klitschko moved up to #2
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by VG_Addict View PostGuys, the HW division isn't considered weak because Wlad is so dominant. Even if Wlad weren't there, it would still be considered weak, because other than Wlad, there aren't that many good fighters. You know something is wrong when clumsy, unskilled oaf Tyson Fury is a top 10 contender. A weak division without a dominant champion is still a weak division.
Povetkin went life and death with CW Huck, and Pulev struggled with Ustinov and ancient Thompson.
Besides Ustinov is a gigantic man mountain, I never really seen Pulev struggling I seen him going out for the stoppage and he got it eventually.
It's not even really worth mentioning previous opponents with who Joe Frazier, Ali and Joe Louis had a hard time with its just the simply fact that styles make fights.
For a man just going up to HW Marco Huck was a lot more physically imposing and aggressive than anyone could have ever imagined him being, somewhat reminiscent to the same aggressiveness Holyfield showed when he made his jump to the HW division.
Comment
-
What I would like to test someone to is do you really think If Manny Pacquiao or Floyd Mayweather were 6ft + fighting in the heavier weight divisions that they'd be able to fight in the same manner as they do?
The point is Manny Pacquiaos style is tailored to that of a lighter fighter and so is Floyd Mayweathers If you really think they could bring that to a much heavier division then you've got to be living in fantasy land!
We have only seen one physical beast at the heavyweight division that brought all physical aspects of speed, agility and power and that was Mike Tyson, I don't think that can be replicated some fighters are just physically gifted and Mike was one of those guys.
On the other foot do you think that any heavyweight legend of the past or present would fight like they did in their heavyweight career If they were 5ft 7 fighting in the welterweight division?
Sure maybe some might and it might work but for the majority it wouldn't.
As for Ray saying If Rigo was 6ft3 and 200+ lbs...
I'd LOVE to see a heavyweight that has the footwork of his try and move like that for 12 rounds, he'd likely gas himself out in 6 rounds.
Comment
-
Originally posted by crold1 View PostThere's an update coming this week with some changes (Kovalev and Wlad in, Ward out). The top two haven't changed here: //krikya360.com/forums/view.php?pg=pound
Easily the worst P4P list right now out of all top Boxing P4P lists on the internet. The Gonzalez thing has pretty much become a big joke. Estrada in the top 10.
Comment
-
Originally posted by -Kev- View PostGonzalez #2
Easily the worst P4P list right now out of all top Boxing P4P lists on the internet. The Gonzalez thing has pretty much become a big joke. Estrada in the top 10.
Comment
-
Originally posted by crold1 View PostTime will tell. hardly alone on the Gonzalez thing. I look at divisional strength first. Nothing is stronger right now, top to bottom, than 147 and 112 IMO.
Too many P4P rankings focus on achievements long past, rather than recent ones.
Right NOW, Gonzalez (who has been winning IMPRESSIVELY) is clearly one of the top fighters in the world.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Freedom2014 View Post147 is overrated, but I agree Gonzalez should be near the top of the P4P list.
Too many P4P rankings focus on achievements long past, rather than recent ones.
Right NOW, Gonzalez (who has been winning IMPRESSIVELY) is clearly one of the top fighters in the world.
Comment
-
Originally posted by crold1 View PostThe only prime offensive force on his level, IMO, is Golovkin and GGG doesn't quite have the resume yet. I would be less than shocked if they are the two best fighters in the world in many mind by the end of next year/into 2016.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Red Cyclone View PostMan that's a gigantic cluster load of crap.
If all of that what you're saying is true then why do so many people think a man who lays up against the ropes and allows a man to whale on them should be regarded as the all time P4P best (Muhammad Ali)...
I'm just looking at snippets of that wall of text because honestly I can tell its a load of crap.
The system was invented because of him. Only some bizarre fanboy argues otherwise in part to a damn bias.
This heavyweight nonsense is out of control.
| |
Comment
-
As a criteria,
Winning titles in MULTIPLE weight classes, while fighting undisputed or linear competitors who are the best in the given division should be the determining factor.
Once again.
Heavyweight is the echelon weight. It's considered by many to be nonsense rating one as a P4P contender.
Sorry. I won't bug you guys again here.
| |Last edited by Run; 11-26-2014, 05:20 AM.
Comment
Comment