Paulie Malignaggi Goes On Twitter Rant About Pacquiao & PEDs

[HanzGruber]

Paulie dksab

[jifferson]

Paulie Malignaggi is an articulate, level-headed student of the game. He is not a hater. Everything he says is true, he has a better vantage point than 99% of us so he should be commended for speaking out on issues like this.

The guy in your pic is a ATG.

[arraamis]

you are the only one who is getting the meaning wrong. you know what you meant but choose to lie.

stop supporting paulie because he's a hater. why can't you see this? why do you hate a great man like pacquiao so much and prop up a hater like paulie? it's disturbing.

and using words like facsimile makes you sound pretentious.

I can see that you're not the sharpest tack in the box, so this is my last reply addressing your severely lacking reading skills and abuse of the english language.

How is it even remotely possible for me to get the meaning behind what I wrote wrong? Perhaps, in the very confused world you live its possible, but not in mine. I stated, what I stated with the understanding that others can read and comprehend - Obviously, I was mistaken. Had I considered the complete immaturity of some readers on NSB, I would have just posted pictures instead.

And BTW, I will support whom I choose, without consideration of morons on forums. If Paulie is correct in his statements then so be it. I don't need nor do I attempt to consider fan-boys opinions, since they are off-times jaded by silly immature fabrications that have no basis in reality.

You want to flame Paulie because he made an accurate statement about your hero ... Fine, that's your choice. But don't corrupt what others write to mean something totally different in context. That is the first sign, that your attempt at rebuttal is weak and short of facts.

[HanzGruber]

Andre Ward and Bernard Hopkins have repeatedly refused to do PED testing.

Why doesn't Paulie say anything about them?

Ward isn't jumping weight classes and destroying people. He's out boxing them tactically. A honestly bhop is 50. Let him use peds if he wants lol

[-MAKAVELLI-]

gotta love it when C+ level fighters pop off

[Divine Hammer]

why are you so harsh in your attack? you should feel good about your education and your ability to say big words. but you should understand that others weren't fortunate enough to be as educated as you. you take too much pride in showing off how educated you are and i think you feel that puts you on a higher pedestal than everyone else. but like my mom would always say to me:

les premiers seront les derniers. (which basically means it is virtuous to be humble but a sin to be too prideful)

and again you are ignoring your own meaning of what you said. you agreed with paulie about fanboyism and criticizing both sides yet disregard the fact that he himself is a fanboy and only criticizes one side which is manny. why prop up paulie like he has the moral high ground when he himself is a proven hypocrite.

and isn't it odd how he hasn't done extra drug testing but feels the need to attack others for being su****ious and giving no credit to pacquiao who has done extra drug testing twice?

I can see that you're not the sharpest tack in the box, so this is my last reply addressing your severely lacking reading skills and abuse of the english language.

How is it even remotely possible for me to get the meaning behind what I wrote wrong? Perhaps, in the very confused world you live its possible, but not in mine. I stated, what I stated with the understanding that others can read and comprehend - Obviously, I was mistaken. Had I considered the complete immaturity of some readers on NSB, I would have just posted pictures instead.

And BTW, I will support whom I choose, without consideration of morons on forums. If Paulie is correct in his statements then so be it. I don't need nor do I attempt to consider fan-boys opinions, since they are off-times jaded by silly immature fabrications that have no basis in reality.

You want to flame Paulie because he made an accurate statement about your hero ... Fine, that's your choice. But don't corrupt what others write to mean something totally different in context. That is the first sign, that your attempt at rebuttal is weak and short of facts.

[shadow-boxer]

why are you so harsh in your attack? you should feel good about your education and your ability to say big words. but you should understand that others weren't fortunate enough to be as educated as you. you take too much pride in showing off how educated you are and i think you feel that puts you on a higher pedestal than everyone else. but like my mom would always say to me:

les premiers seront les derniers. (which basically means it is virtuous to be humble but a sin to be too prideful)

and again you are ignoring your own meaning of what you said. you agreed with paulie about fanboyism and criticizing both sides yet disregard the fact that he himself is a fanboy and only criticizes one side which is manny. why prop up paulie like he has the moral high ground when he himself is a proven hypocrite.

and isn't it odd how he hasn't done extra drug testing but feels the need to attack others for being su****ious and giving no credit to pacquiao who has done extra drug testing twice?

Sorry to butt in but you are lying again. He did it only once. Against Rios.

[Divine Hammer]

[/B]

Sorry to butt in but you are lying again. He did it only once. Against Rios.

he did it against bradley too. it just wasn't done by VADA. pacquiao vs rios was done by VADA and his next fight will be using VADA testing again.

The cost of the enhanced program, which averages between $35,00 and $45,000, is being covered by the UFC. Top Rank did the same for the Pacquiao-Bradley fight. Aguilar said he expects a similar commitment from Golden Boy Promotions.

[ИATAS]

My sources tell me Paulie has been taking estrogen for years.

[shadow-boxer]

I can see that you're not the sharpest tack in the box, so this is my last reply addressing your severely lacking reading skills and abuse of the english language.

How is it even remotely possible for me to get the meaning behind what I wrote wrong? Perhaps, in the very confused world you live its possible, but not in mine. I stated, what I stated with the understanding that others can read and comprehend - Obviously, I was mistaken. Had I considered the complete immaturity of some readers on NSB, I would have just posted pictures instead.

And BTW, I will support whom I choose, without consideration of morons on forums. If Paulie is correct in his statements then so be it. I don't need nor do I attempt to consider fan-boys opinions, since they are off-times jaded by silly immature fabrications that have no basis in reality.

You want to flame Paulie because he made an accurate statement about your hero ... Fine, that's your choice. But don't corrupt what others write to mean something totally different in context. That is the first sign, that your attempt at rebuttal is weak and short of facts.

How is that again? are there such things as fabrications that are silly and immature? and have no basis "in reality"? Oh boy!