Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Best I've faced

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Elroy The Great View Post
    tyson lost to the best guys he fought (and they werent even close fights).

    the titles tyson took were from crackheads
    berbick ?!?!?!
    thomas ?!?!?!
    shot tucker ?!?!?!?
    seldon ?!?!?!?

    the holmes tyson fought would have lost to Sultan Ibragimov, Tony Thompson, Eddie Chambers

    tyson reign ended once he fought legit guys. thats why he rarely ever fought them.

    I'm talking about eras. And btw, Lennox Lewis is my favorite Heavyweight. But I recognize that the Tyson-Lewis-Holyfield era was way, way, way, way better than the dreadful Klitschko era. That's all I am saying.

    Btw how was Tony Tucker shot when he fought Mike? Tucker was 34-0, he was undefeated.
    Last edited by True That; 06-22-2018, 11:02 PM.

    Comment


      Originally posted by True That View Post
      I'm talking about eras. And btw, Lennox Lewis is my favorite Heavyweight. But I recognize that the Tyson-Lewis-Holyfield era was way, way, way, way better than the dreadful Klitschko era. That's all I am saying.
      tyson was **** and his resume reflects this. had he actually fought the guys holy and lewis fought......

      ribalta, green, tubbs......oh my

      Comment


        Originally posted by Elroy The Great View Post
        tyson was **** and his resume reflects this. had he actually fought the guys holy and lewis fought......

        ribalta, green, tubbs......oh my
        The Heavyweights from the Tyson-Lewis-Holyfield era were way better contenders and Heavyweights than the Klitschko era.

        And btw how was Tony Tucker shot when he fought Mike? Tucker was 34-0 when he fought Mike, he was undefeated. Tucker fought Lewis too, Frank Bruno fought Mike and Lennox, Donovan Razor Ruddock fought Mike and Lennox, Andrew Golota fought Mike and Lennox.

        Anyway, that era of Heavyweights was way, way, way better than the Klitschko era of Heavyweights. That is all I am saying.
        Last edited by True That; 06-22-2018, 11:43 PM.

        Comment


          Originally posted by BufordTannen View Post
          Floyds biggest butt hurt opponents didn't say how good he is? Shocker. They're both still in denial about losing you ***ing ******

          Manny said cotto was his smartest opponent lmao. Manny has a 4th grade education
          Running and hugging shouldn't be allowed in boxing and that is floyd best technique.

          Comment


            Originally posted by WesternChamp View Post
            not sure why floyd fans is getting mad that most fighters is not picking floyd.

            floyd never fought his opponents in a way to really make them see how good/great he is. you cant respect someone who has never tested you.
            Right man. They should be mad at floyd.

            Comment


              Originally posted by True That View Post
              The Heavyweights from the Tyson-Lewis-Holyfield era were way better contenders and Heavyweights than the Klitschko era.

              And btw how was Tony Tucker shot when he fought Mike? Tucker was 34-0, he was undefeated.

              Anyway, that era of Heavyweights was way, way, way better than the Klitschko era of Heavyweights. That is all.
              who did tyson fight in that era ?!?!?!

              smdh @ tucker being undefeated.....TAKE A GANDER AT WHO HE FOUGHT !!!!!
              then he goes on another ''unbeaten'' streak only to get the rude awakening.

              give me 1 quality name he beat prior to tyson (dont you dare mention buster)

              if nothing else, tucker was one of the best bum beaters the hw div ever had.

              lord have mercy !!!!!!!!!!!!

              Comment


                Originally posted by Elroy The Great View Post
                who did tyson fight in that era ?!?!?!

                smdh @ tucker being undefeated.....TAKE A GANDER AT WHO HE FOUGHT !!!!!
                then he goes on another ''unbeaten'' streak only to get the rude awakening.

                give me 1 quality name he beat prior to tyson (dont you dare mention buster)

                if nothing else, tucker was one of the best bum beaters the hw div ever had.

                lord have mercy !!!!!!!!!!!!

                Originally posted by Elroy The Great View Post
                tyson was **** and his resume reflects this. had he actually fought the guys holy and lewis fought......

                ribalta, green, tubbs......oh my
                The Heavyweights from the Tyson-Lewis-Holyfield era were way better contenders and Heavyweights than the Klitschko era.

                And btw how was Tony Tucker shot when he fought Mike? Tucker was 34-0 when he fought Mike, he was undefeated. You said he was shot. Tucker fought Lewis too, Frank Bruno fought Mike and Lennox, Donovan Razor Ruddock fought Mike and Lennox, Andrew Golota fought Mike and Lennox.

                Anyway, that era of Heavyweights was way, way, way better than the Klitschko era of Heavyweights. That is all I am saying.


                Duh, I'm not saying Mike was the best of his era. All I'm saying is that era of Heavyweights is, way, way, way better than Klitschko's era. That's it. It really isn't hard to comprehend or understand what I am saying when it is just a fact.
                Last edited by True That; 06-22-2018, 11:56 PM.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by True That View Post
                  The Heavyweights from the Tyson-Lewis-Holyfield era were way better contenders and Heavyweights than the Klitschko era.

                  And btw how was Tony Tucker shot when he fought Mike? Tucker was 34-0 when he fought Mike, he was undefeated. Tucker fought Lewis too, Frank Bruno fought Mike and Lennox, Donovan Razor Ruddock fought Mike and Lennox, Andrew Golota fought Mike and Lennox.

                  Anyway, that era of Heavyweights was way, way, way better than the Klitschko era of Heavyweights. That is all I am saying.
                  thanks for telling me who tyson fought in that badassed era

                  thanks for giving me JUST 1 QUALITY NAME tucker beat PRIOR to losing to tyson

                  tucker was ''shot'' in that he would never win a title again. bum win after bum win. faced a live body and gets that l.

                  razor, bruno....tyson thinks more highly of ribalta, tubbs and green

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Elroy The Great View Post
                    thanks for telling me who tyson fought in that badassed era

                    thanks for giving me JUST 1 QUALITY NAME tucker beat PRIOR to losing to tyson

                    tucker was ''shot'' in that he would never win a title again. bum win after bum win. faced a live body and gets that l.

                    razor, bruno....tyson thinks more highly of ribalta, tubbs and green

                    Fact is the Heavyweights of The Tyson-Lewis-Holyfield era are light years better than the Klitschko era. Lewis, Bowe, Holyfield, Tyson, Tua, Mercer, Ibeabuchi, Briggs, Ruddock, Bruno, Rahman, Grant, Golota, etc.,etc...That is my point. The Heavyweights back then were way, way better than the Klitschko era. That's fact. That Can't be disputed and that is what I've been saying. #True That!
                    Last edited by True That; 06-23-2018, 12:18 AM.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by True That View Post
                      Fact is the Heavyweights of The Tyson-Lewis-Holyfield era are light years better than the Klitschko era. That is my point. That can't be disputed. That's fact.
                      what good is an era if a dude isnt going to fight anyone in it

                      ''tucker was undefeated'' !!!!
                      true yet truly hysterical !!!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP