Originally posted by JaYDeuce11
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Arum Has Several Options in Store After Pacquiao-Rios
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by BUNGALOWS View PostTim would've faced Ruslan, win, lose or draw with Manny. Tim would never have gotten to chance to fight JMM if the judges didn't screw PAC.
At the end of the day, EVERYONE knows PAC won, so how is this even a question?
you know there is no point to tim/manny 2 other than to see the judges score it differently. as such, why not give us something fresh like manny v ruslan instead?
then give us the inevitable manny beating tim again.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Big Dunn View Posttim fought jmm because JMM knocked manny out. I think tim won too and manny was robbed.
you know there is no point to tim/manny 2 other than to see the judges score it differently. as such, why not give us something fresh like manny v ruslan instead?
then give us the inevitable manny beating tim again.
If Bradley never gets the gift decision, he isn't the champ. Therefore he has no equity. Therefore, he fights Ruslan, regardless. Then, Pac fights JMM. He gets KO'd, and then probably still fights Rios, OR, he fights winner of Bradley/Prov, in order to fight for JMM's belt.
If none of that happens. Bradley waits for the winner of Pac/Rios to fight for JMM's belt.
You don't go from losing to Pac, then beating Prov, and automatic title contender.
And if JMM would've refused to fight winner of Pac/Bradley, then he forfeits the belt.
Pac gets Bradley, end of story.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BUNGALOWS View PostNo, you're going by a different, hypothetical time table. It's not that clear cut.
If Bradley never gets the gift decision, he isn't the champ. Therefore he has no equity. Therefore, he fights Ruslan, regardless. Then, Pac fights JMM. He gets KO'd, and then probably still fights Rios, OR, he fights winner of Bradley/Prov, in order to fight for JMM's belt.
If none of that happens. Bradley waits for the winner of Pac/Rios to fight for JMM's belt.
You don't go from losing to Pac, then beating Prov, and automatic title contender.
And if JMM would've refused to fight winner of Pac/Bradley, then he forfeits the belt.
Pac gets Bradley, end of story.
You have advocated for action/excitment over boring fights. yet you want to see tim/manny 2, a fight you said was boring and that manny won 10-2 (i believe) over manny/ruslan.
I think you can see that seems to be a contradiction.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Big Dunn View Postyou mean maboribgts tim assuming he beats rios, right?
You have advocated for action/excitment over boring fights. yet you want to see tim/manny 2, a fight you said was boring and that manny won 10-2 (i believe) over manny/ruslan.
I think you can see that seems to be a contradiction.
My point isn't about excitement. My point is, I don't want an already old ass Pacquiao getting into a war with Ruslan before he faces the guy that got a gift decision over him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BUNGALOWS View PostWhen have I ever said Manny/tim was boring?
My point isn't about excitement. My point is, I don't want an already old ass Pacquiao getting into a war with Ruslan before he faces the guy that got a gift decision over him.
But do you see Bradley risking another fight with Manny? I don't...
Comment
-
Originally posted by King- View PostTo be fair, Cotto came back to Arum/Top Rank.
Comment
Comment