Comments Thread For: Merchant Would Rather See Pacquiao Bypass Bradley

[qari]

Pacman is a crappy ass fighter he is crap now eny1 who disagrees is a ******* kumon mosley n marquez n bradley fights hahahahahahahah disgraceful hu ever buys his ppvs i feel sorry for u lame turds he is twat weight draining fighters n fytin ppl coming off losses or crappy performances n the ones he dosent do that to marquez he tried to make him fat but he got skwled agen ahahhaaa

[Rome-By-Ko]

I have to say, the most impressive part of Pacquiao-Bradley is that Bradley did go forward and brawl at times, without ever hitting the canvas like everyone thought he would.

As a Pacquiao and Bradley fan, I would love to see this fight again. I think it would be better. My boxing fandom is far outweighing that though, and I would be sickened if this rematch happened.

I believe PAC should want this fight,I for one love this rematch...I thought it was a great fight..

[rao007]

Bradley was a grade A can who didn't want to get hurt so he basially boxed 90% of the time....he made claims of destroying Pacquiao, dying in the ring but in the end...did exactly what most of the guys did before him did which was to backpedal and box....ur craptastic Bradley you make ur people proud.

[The Big Dunn]

Bradley was a grade A can who didn't want to get hurt so he basially boxed 90% of the time....he made claims of destroying Pacquiao, dying in the ring but in the end...did exactly what most of the guys did before him did which was to backpedal and box....ur craptastic Bradley you make ur people proud.

whats wrong with bradley using his skills to try and win? are you saying he has to fight only one way?

[tredh]

whats wrong with bradley using his skills to try and win? are you saying he has to fight only one way?

This is what many of them have been saying for years. It usually goes along the lines of "I bet fighter A won't fight fighter b toe to to cause they know they will get KTFO!"

Basically they want fighter A to not fight to his strenghts just so fighter b is competitive and has a better chance of winning. They don't realize boxing is competition first which means winning by any means besides cheating comes first and looking good while winning comes in a distant second.

I never understood most folks now a days calling skilled fighters boring but not having a bad thing to say about the less skilled fighter not acquiring the skills to effectively deal with all styles that they are faced with. I guess this train of thought is the same as folks being mad that a score got ran up but not being mad that the team wasn't good enough to stop the other team from scoring. So said high scoring team has to dumb down their ability to score or be label as classless. GO figure

[Weebler I]

Another opponent who runs from Pacquiao and loses a UD is boring for everyone and tells us nothing about the fighter

Respectfully, it tells us that Manny isn't proficient at cutting off the ring and can't be effective with movement. If manny loses because his opponenet capitalizes on his weaknesses, well then get better or retires.

Why do opponenets only have to fight or beat Manny one way? Funny, but I don't remember people asking for fighters to stand in front of Tyson and let him KHTFO. They said, hey jab and move and see what mike can do.

Sasme principle applies here.

He still wins the fight and everybody gets bored watching him chase his opponent so what's it matter?

Pacquiao beat the runners Bradley and Mosley, you want to watch that again or some other fighter who is going to run from him? boring.

I want to see an exciting fight.