Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: Ortiz Has a Big Chance To Beat Mayweather
Collapse
-
-
Floyd can easily be beat by applying consistant pressure to him. Castillo proved that when he beat Floyd in their first fight, but they gave it to Floyd. Floyd was loosing on all score cards. Why do you think that he's making all these testing excuses not to fight a super aggresive fighter like Manny?
Comment
-
Originally posted by vinny2006 View PostFloyd can easily be beat by applying consistant pressure to him. Castillo proved that when he beat Floyd in their first fight, but they gave it to Floyd. Floyd was loosing on all score cards. Why do you think that he's making all these testing excuses not to fight a super aggresive fighter like Manny?
The rematch tells you everything about who was the best in that division. Not even Team Castillo argued about that one.
Comment
-
Originally posted by vinny2006 View PostFloyd can easily be beat by applying consistant pressure to him. Castillo proved that when he beat Floyd in their first fight, but they gave it to Floyd. Floyd was loosing on all score cards. Why do you think that he's making all these testing excuses not to fight a super aggresive fighter like Manny?
Or how about every fighter since then? I mean all they had to do was look at that first fight and say " Hey, this is how you beat Floyd. It is sooo easy." You don't think people already tried to figure that out all the years since then? And what happened? They all failed.
Comment
-
Bob Arum, Pacquiao’s promoter, was less diplomatic regarding the 24-year-old Ortiz (29-2-2, 22 KOs), who would ruin what could become the most lucrative event in boxing history if he upsets the unbeaten Mayweather (41-0, 25 KOs).
“He has no chance,” Arum said of Ortiz. “A fighter never knows he has no chance, but he has no chance.”
Article Link - //krikya360.com/?m=show&o...#ixzz1XNJN5j2jLast edited by GRUSTLER; 09-08-2011, 10:48 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 2stepshep View PostIf that is the case then why is it that every fight since then have all resulted in Floyd winning? I mean that fight happened well over 9 years ago. Floyd has had plenty of fights since then. Including an immediate rematch with Castillo. If it was so easy the first time why couldn't Castillo pull it off again? Didn't work that way did it?
Or how about every fighter since then? I mean all they had to do was look at that first fight and say " Hey, this is how you beat Floyd. It is sooo easy." You don't think people already tried to figure that out all the years since then? And what happened? They all failed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MindBat View PostFloyd fought with one arm in the first fight, and the judges saw the fight differently.
The rematch tells you everything about who was the best in that division. Not even Team Castillo argued about that one.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CharliesRecords View PostThe point is he lost that first fight with Castillo so he is not undefeated as he claims to be, and don't give me that bull**** that he fought with one arm, if that is the case, I heard Castillo made the same claim on their second fight....trying getting off Mayweather's **** for once stepshep....
But it doesn't matter what people think now does it? It matters what the judges think. Just like I thought Marquez beat Pac in the 2nd fight. All of press row and all the sports writers felt the same way. But in the end the judges didn't see it that way or the pac fans.
Comment
Comment