Comments Thread For: Pacquiao is Getting Very Impatient With Mayweather

[LeadUppercut]

just go back to post # 119...

you can not just make a free for all or expand a thread way way off the topic subject to the discussion...

you are really losing it, lead...

you are now acting like a spoiled kid..

No, I have no interest in your dishonest whiney dribble, I will discuss whatever I want, whenever I want, end of story..... and right now, this is what I want to discuss.....

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....


And by the way, it must really rile you now that the ENTIRE WORLD knows that Pac has been ducking Marquez since 2008.....

[tangalog2200]

No, I have no interest in your dishonest whiney dribble, I will discuss whatever I want, whenever I want, end of story..... and right now, this is what I want to discuss.....

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....


And by the way, it must really rile you now that the ENTIRE WORLD knows that Pac has been ducking Marquez since 2008.....

No, I have no interest in your dishonest whiney dribble, I will discuss whatever I want, whenever I want, end of story..... and right now, this is what I want to discuss.....

ah, another self-serving rehash of irrelevant trash from the spoiled kid...

i can not help you kid...

and i don't know who can...

very tempting to say that i have owned you in this thread, lead..

but i won't...

i will get no props or medals for it...

have already dwell so long on this thread..just go back to post # 119..

and learn.......

cheers

[LeadUppercut]

No, I have no interest in your dishonest whiney dribble, I will discuss whatever I want, whenever I want, end of story..... and right now, this is what I want to discuss.....

ah, another self-serving rehash of irrelevant trash from the spoiled kid...

i can not help you kid...

and i don't know who can...

very tempting to say that i have owned you in this thread, lead..

but i won't...

i will get no props or medals for it...

have already dwell so long on this thread..just go back to post # 119..

and learn.......

cheers

You are a total fkn clown for even insinuating that, a Check-hook level clown at that. Just another dishonest, flag-waving, non-boxing, fanboy.

What I will do, is categorically state that I have owned your dishonest whiney arse in this thread, and that you have done NOTHING, except behave like a spoiled whiney b1tch.

You wasted my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that Pacquiao's "lawsuit" against Mayweather was a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his legal action ..... but when I asked you why Pacquiao did not also sue Cintron and Malinaggi (who said much worse) you felt that Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money"

How dishonest can you get ?

Also, you have consistently ducked my questions, and yet insinuated that I was "avoiding" the issues.

What a fkn idiot kid, how could you have "owned" anyone, when you have repeatedly ducked me like a b1tch.

Answer these questions clown, or *** off and cry somewhere else

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....

[LeadUppercut]

Hey, has anyone figured out yet, why that coward Pacquiao ducked Marquez like a b1tch for three years?

[Aut_72]

42 pages of whining, bit chi ng, moaning and complaining... but but..

: Pac agree...
: Oh no he didn't...

: Floyd ducked this...
: Oh no he didn't...

This is worse than what came first chicken or egg../

[LeadUppercut]

42 pages of whining, bit chi ng, moaning and complaining... but but..

: Pac agree...
: Oh no he didn't...

: Floyd ducked this...
: Oh no he didn't...

This is worse than what came first chicken or egg../

The egg (Mayweather).

That chicken Pacquiao wandered along later.

[LeadUppercut]

Pac-fans..... lower standards than a $5 whore.

You fkn ******s, a catch-weight is where both fighters meet at middle ground, in order to even up the fight.

Pacquiao " conceded " a weight that he has never actually made himself

" middle ground " to Pacquiao, is when you demand a higher weight than you ever actually made yourself, one which YOU KNOW disadvantages your opponent.

" middle ground " would be 140, coincidentally, Mannys best weight.

But " no way, we cannot risk the possibility that Marquez could enter the ring at a weight at which he might still be dangerous, lets take no chances and rip him right out of his comfort zone, because you will still be ok at 145 Manny ".

If my boy ever pulled any cowardly **** like that, I would roast him alive.

Only ******ed pac-**** could consider that fight anything more than a pointless exhibition match.

You ridiculous clowns are a joke

[rambov]

lead uppercut - owning *******s since May of 2010

[LeadUppercut]

You fkn ******s, a catch-weight is where both fighters meet at middle ground, in order to even up the fight.

Pacquiao " conceded " a weight that he has never actually made himself

" middle ground " to Pacquiao, is when you demand a higher weight than you ever actually made yourself, one which YOU KNOW disadvantages your opponent.

" middle ground " would be 140, coincidentally, Mannys best weight.

But " no way, we cannot risk the possibility that Marquez could enter the ring at a weight at which he might still be dangerous, lets take no chances and rip him right out of his comfort zone, because you will still be ok at 145 Manny ".

If my boy ever pulled any cowardly **** like that, I would roast him alive.

Only ******ed pac-**** could consider that fight anything more than a pointless exhibition match.

You ridiculous clowns are a joke

lead uppercut - owning *******s since May of 2010

But why should I have to ?

Why is it my job ?

What is not obvious about the following facts, this situation should be plainly obvious to any genuine boxing fan.....

A catch-weight is where both fighters meet at middle ground, in order to produce a fairer contest.

Pacquiao " conceded " a weight that he has never actually made himself

" middle ground " to Pacquiao, is when you demand a higher weight than you ever actually made yourself, one which YOU KNOW disadvantages your opponent.

" middle ground " would be 140, coincidentally, Mannys best weight.

But " no way, we cannot risk the possibility that Marquez could enter the ring at a weight at which he might still be dangerous, lets take no chances and rip him right out of his comfort zone, because you will still be ok at 145 Manny ".

If my boy ever pulled any cowardly **** like that, I would roast him alive.

Only ******ed pac-**** could consider that fight anything more than a pointless exhibition match.

You ridiculous clowns are a joke

[kfcfloydiots]

All the chickens#!t smell leads to Mayweather.