Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Pacquiao is Getting Very Impatient With Mayweather

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by LeadUppercut View Post
    For starters, you dishonest whiney ****, you have continually ducked almost every single question that has been put in front of you, so you will not be mouthing off insinuating that honest posters are ducking you, clownboy.

    Secondly.....



    Actually, Pac ducking Marquez does tie in with the " lawsuit ".

    I am proving character, opportunity, and intent.

    FACT: Pacquiao has already proven that he is a cherry-picking coward who will not step up to the plate when he ducked Marquez for three years.....


    THE EXACT SAME THING THAT HE HAS DONE WITH MAYWEATHER !!
    very good......

    why don't you go to floyd's lawyers and tell them to use your conjectures...

    specially the way you tie up marquez to the case...

    Actually, Pac ducking Marquez does tie in with the " lawsuit ".

    I am proving character, opportunity, and intent.


    wow..classic legal defense from lead...

    to defend floyd, the master of defense...

    who has a battery of lawyers....

    and still could not submit a deposition..

    yes, lead, help them with the deposition....

    the court is waiting..........

    pac is waiting.....

    i am waiting......

    go to floyd's lawyers with your conjectures and let us see what happens....

    i bet they might even sue you for disturbing their peace..

    Comment


      Why Mayweder not show to court? Why he say he needs 24 days? Manny already agreed to everything so Floyd should too. No more cut-off dates!!

      Comment


        Originally posted by LeadUppercut View Post
        Originally Posted by tangalog2200
        you still don't get it, son...

        pac winning the court case vs floyd would already be a slap on the faces of pac's accusers, including malinaggi and cintron and the multitude of pac haters...
        yesterday, all my troubles seem so far away....

        that's from a beatles song, son.....

        this thread is mainly about the existing and on-going law suit..

        i repeat, existing and on-going law suit....

        and pac's impatience with floyd not submitting a deposition..

        you enjoy riding on your time machine to pick up small bits and pieces of, may i say, defense materials for your dear floyd...

        and for that, i could commend you for your love of floyd...

        and in one of your post, tying marquez to the law suit, you stated...

        I am proving character, opportunity, and intent.

        may i ask you to also apply that to floyd?

        even just prove his character....please

        Comment


          Originally posted by Boy Abunda View Post
          Why Mayweder not show to court? Why he say he needs 24 days? Manny already agreed to everything so Floyd should too. No more cut-off dates!!
          they're waiting for lead...

          lead will help them to prepare the deposition..

          lead will now be the lead legal counsel of floyd...

          Comment


            the lawsuit will be dismissed. my aunts the DDA for north las vegas this lawsuits a failure against jr. maybe he'll win against sr n roger though.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Mannie Phresh View Post
              the lawsuit will be dismissed. my aunts the DDA for north las vegas this lawsuits a failure against jr. maybe he'll win against sr n roger though.
              lol yea right

              Comment


                Originally posted by tangalog2200 View Post
                yesterday, all my troubles seem so far away....

                that's from a beatles song, son.....

                this thread is mainly about the existing and on-going law suit..

                i repeat, existing and on-going law suit....

                and pac's impatience with floyd not submitting a deposition..

                you enjoy riding on your time machine to pick up small bits and pieces of, may i say, defense materials for your dear floyd...

                and for that, i could commend you for your love of floyd...

                and in one of your post, tying marquez to the law suit, you stated...

                I am proving character, opportunity, and intent.

                may i ask you to also apply that to floyd?

                even just prove his character....please
                " this thread is mainly about "..... whatever I decide, clownboy.

                You will not make the rules, because you are not the commission

                The subject, is that cherry-picking, hypejob, Manny Pacquiao.

                This thread has confirmed two things.....

                1.) Manny Pacquiao is a manufactured fighter, with a manufactured resume'.

                Not only should he be ashamed of himself for ducking Juan Manuel Marquez for three years, he should be ashamed of himself for the way that he has behaved over this drug testing debacle. Simply unacceptable.

                And now USADA are corrupt ?

                2.) You are nothing but a dishonest, ignorant, non-boxing, fanboi.

                You have wasted my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that this is a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his "lawsuit" against Mayweather..... but for some strange reason Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money "

                Like I said..... " a dishonest, ignorant, non-boxing, fanboi ".

                As I have opened up the thread subject, these questions are on the table.....

                1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

                2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

                3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

                4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

                5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

                6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

                7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

                8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....


                And by the way, it must really rile you now that the ENTIRE WORLD knows that Pac has been ducking Marquez since 2008.....


                Like I said earlier, you can continue to lie to yourself all you want clownboy, but you are wasting your time attempting to peddle childish whiney excuses to an adult who also happens to be an experienced boxing fan.

                Pacquiao is ducking Mayweather like a b1tch, just like he ducked Marquez, just like he ducked Mosley (TWICE), just like he ducked every genuine JMW, and just like he ducked Victor Ortiz.

                Shameful

                Comment


                  Originally posted by LeadUppercut View Post
                  Pacquiao is ducking Mayweather like a b1tch, just like he ducked Marquez, just like he ducked Mosley (TWICE), just like he ducked every genuine JMW, and just like he ducked Victor Ortiz.

                  Shameful
                  Notice how I didnt even mention Martinez ?

                  But, I am happy to compile a complete list containing all of the fighters that Pacquiao has ducked if requested?

                  It will start with Too Sharp down at flyweight.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by LeadUppercut View Post
                    " this thread is mainly about "..... whatever I decide, clownboy.

                    You will not make the rules, because you are not the commission

                    The subject, is that cherry-picking, hypejob, Manny Pacquiao.

                    This thread has confirmed two things.....

                    1.) Manny Pacquiao is a manufactured fighter, with a manufactured resume'.

                    Not only should he be ashamed of himself for ducking Juan Manuel Marquez for three years, he should be ashamed of himself for the way that he has behaved over this drug testing debacle. Simply unacceptable.

                    And now USADA are corrupt ?

                    2.) You are nothing but a dishonest, ignorant, non-boxing, fanboi.

                    You have wasted my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that this is a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his "lawsuit" against Mayweather..... but for some strange reason Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money "

                    Like I said..... " a dishonest, ignorant, non-boxing, fanboi ".

                    As I have opened up the thread subject, these questions are on the table.....

                    1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

                    2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

                    3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

                    4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

                    5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

                    6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

                    7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

                    8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....


                    And by the way, it must really rile you now that the ENTIRE WORLD knows that Pac has been ducking Marquez since 2008.....


                    Like I said earlier, you can continue to lie to yourself all you want clownboy, but you are wasting your time attempting to peddle childish whiney excuses to an adult who also happens to be an experienced boxing fan.

                    Pacquiao is ducking Mayweather like a b1tch, just like he ducked Marquez, just like he ducked Mosley (TWICE), just like he ducked every genuine JMW, and just like he ducked Victor Ortiz.

                    Shameful
                    just go back to post # 119...

                    you can not just make a free for all or expand a thread way way off the topic subject to the discussion...

                    you are really losing it, lead...

                    you are now acting like a spoiled kid..

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by LeadUppercut View Post
                      Notice how I didnt even mention Martinez ?

                      But, I am happy to compile a complete list containing all of the fighters that Pacquiao has ducked if requested?

                      It will start with Too Sharp down at flyweight.
                      go back to post # 119...

                      read it again and again until you understand at least 10% of what's in it...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP