Comments Thread For: Mayweather Jr. is Blasted By The IRS, $3.4 Million Tax Bill

[LeadUppercut]

check out who has the most number of posts here, dude. that's right, your fellow *****, leaduppercut ranting against pacquiao in this mayweather thread.

You are a particularly whiney little ***go7.

Mr 130 posts.....

Has one of posts EVER contained any information relating to boxing ?

Can you think of anything intelligent with which to reply to my assertion that 27% is a cherry-picking hype-job?

Or you you just going to whine like a little b1tch all day long ?

Are you actually lost ?


Sad little ****

[LeadUppercut]

*****s are on the defensive... The number of ****** posts are on the rise and it reflects.

Defensive ?

You clown.

How about you man up and reply to my post shredding 27%'s legacy ?

You clowns are shook.

You have all p1ssed yourself and ducked for cover.

Man up dude, or I will classify you as a non-boxing fanboy ***wit like those other clowns and just tell you to *** off

Defensive indeed

Cotto, and Mosley..... WAITING !!

[LeadUppercut]

Miguel Cotto.....

When Pacquiao fought Cotto, Miguel had just been destroyed by Margarito and then battered by Clottey. EVERY reputable trainer/reporter/analyst said that Cotto looked shop-worn and well-faded, and that he had been in too many wars.

Cotto was not on top of his game, he had begun to slide, he had no trainer to speak of, and was struggling with problems both in camp and at home relating to a family matter that affected his relationship with head trainer Evan Cotto.

Miguel was not on top of his game, and he most certainly was not in his prime..... plus, Pacquiao tried to drain him on the scales.

Listen to this reporter's take on the subject, shortly after the Clottey fight....

"I wasn’t exactly shocked to see Manny Pacquiao’s name being linked for a fight with Miguel Cotto after the Puerto Rican fighters disappointing performance last Saturday night against Joshua Clottey. As bad as Cotto looked in the fight, and believe me Cotto looked pretty awful, it seemed like a no brainer that Pacquiao would then select him as his next opponent.

But my question is why isn’t Pacquiao going after Shane Mosley or Paul Williams instead? Why the emphasis at fighting Cotto, when he was destroyed by Antonio Margarito last year? It seems to me the much better choice for Pacquiao would be to go after Mosley, since he beat Margarito a few months ago by a 9th round TKO.

Since Margarito has already stopped Cotto, the logical choice for Pacquiao to fight would be Mosley. That’s the bout that Pacquiao should be going after unless he wants to be considered a cherry picker."

Pacquiao saw that Cotto was ripe, so he jumped on him, but even the fact that Cotto had faded was not enough of an advantage for 27%..... so he demanded a catch-weight of 145lbs.

A catch-weight, for a title fight..... *** me, that is lame.

Cotto of course, flatly refused. Miguel stated "147 if you want my title, but no-title if you need a catchweight". Of course, 27% demanded a catchweight and the title, it became a sticking point to get the fight made, so Cotto was forced to concede.

But even that was not enough for 27%, he demanded 143, even though his trainer Freddie Roach agreed to 144. Luckily for Miguel he stuck to his guns, or those cherry-picking ****s would have dragged him down to 143lbs.....


Catch-weights.....

There are only two reasons to demand a catch-weight.....

1.) you are not good enough to compete with your opponent at his natural weight

2.) you are attempting to drain your opponent to gain an unfair advantage

Pacquiao tried to drain Cotto, because Manny had already fought at 147.

The 143lb demand was an absolute joke, they really tried to do a number on Cotto. Just because the bullet missed, does not lessen the intent.

Shame on 27% for cheating history, not once, but twice, because he did the same thing to Margarito..... Emmanuel Steward was correct when he said that Pacquiao is a cherry-picker who does not compare with truly great fighters.

What a lame b1tch that 27% kid turned out to be.

Shane Mosley.....

What can I say, this will be short and sweet..... that cherry-picking pu$$y Manny "padded" Pacquiao ducked Shane Mosley not once, but TWICE !!

Initially Mosley offered to go down to 142-143, then he offered to drop to 140, but still 27% would not front up and fight him.

Until that is, Shane was a year older, and had suffered a loss to Mayweather in which he looked like an old man, and an ugly draw with Sergio Mora.

Now, all of a sudden..... Shane's the man.

Who woulda thought, a boxer gets old and slow, and he strikes the payday.

WTF ?

Notice a pattern emerging ?

Shot.....
Hoya > Hatton > Cotto > Margarito > Shane..... then 40yo Marquez at 150 ?

What a fkn hype-job that 27% kid is.

[Check_hooks]

You penis, how would Floyd paying his taxes justify 27% cherry-picking two world titles and beating up an old man?

Think much ?

What I'm trying to figure out is what does that have to do with this thread? You keep changing the topic to Pacquiao this and Pacquiao that. Get off Pacquiao **** you ****.

You already lost the debate when it came to thread topic so like a immature child you change the topic completely to something that has ABSOLUTLY NOTHING to do with the topic.

You should be asking your dad what he was thinking when he shoulda had a vasectomy and you should ask your mom what she was thinking when she was drinking and on crack during your pregnancy (just like Fraud Gayweather Jr. look it up)

[JD Salinger]

You are a particularly whiney little ***go7.

Mr 130 posts.....

Has one of posts EVER contained any information relating to boxing ?

Can you think of anything intelligent with which to reply to my assertion that 27% is a cherry-picking hype-job?

Or you you just going to whine like a little b1tch all day long ?

Are you actually lost ?


Sad little ****.

according to floyd's resident financial adviser/boxing guru (at least, in his own distorted mind), ehem... leaduppercut: the first rule of business, you don't pay your bills until your creditor is just about to initiate legal action, that applies equally to the us government.

leaduppercut's second rule: divert the topic and resort to name-calling when you get . seriously, kid. how old are you??? do the parents know you been spending too much time on the internet? smh.

and lastly, yeah, i am mr. 130 posts, aint that sad? while you are mr. 130 posts in this thread alone. amazing, isnt it? lmao! get a life, son.

[Slick_Rick]

Another whiney little ****, who knows nothing about boxing.

Aint it a laugh that so many non-boxing ***wits would convene here ?

Yeah, you should know, LeadUpper****.

[boxingking500]

leadupecut must really hate pacquiao

fighters get no respect these days

well *****s gone hate...


Mayweather-Spadafora.. coming soon

[LeadUppercut]

The boxingscene jester.....

What I'm trying to figure out is what does that have to do with this thread? You keep changing the topic to Pacquiao this and Pacquiao that. Get off Pacquiao **** you ****.

You already lost the debate when it came to thread topic so like a immature child you change the topic completely to something that has ABSOLUTLY NOTHING to do with the topic.

You should be asking your dad what he was thinking when he shoulda had a vasectomy and you should ask your mom what she was thinking when she was drinking and on crack during your pregnancy (just like Fraud Gayweather Jr. look it up)

Check out this whiney ***go7, the boxingscene jester.....

You are a whiney b1tch, for logging on to a boxing website to spend days discussing another man's finances, and then complaining when somebody brings up the subject of boxing.

You are the class-clown on this site kid, as many posters have pointed out.

Truth be known, even most *******s probably think that you are a ***wit, because you make them look so bad

[LeadUppercut]

Come on 27%, man up b1tch and take the test.....

Yeah, i am mr. 130 posts, aint that sad? while you are mr. 130 posts in this thread alone. amazing, isnt it? lmao! get a life, son.

Nah, you are just a whiney little ****, who knows nothing about boxing

Nor business, for that matter.

Maybe you missed this post ****head ?

Ya fkn dumb kid.

That saying is a hyperbole, it suggests that your money will work better for you if it is sitting in your pocket, rather than somebody else's. The Robert Jones school of business does not suggest that you incur legal action, or default..... it just lightheartedly suggests that, what is one or two statutory demands between friends?

You lame ***go7s are full of **** for nit-picking straws and for losing sleep over another man's finances. Pac-whores are truly the lowest sporting fans in the world.

Hence their low standards.

Hence their acceptance of 27%'s JMW title.

Don't be so ******.

I mention more boxing content in one post, than you have in 130 posts.

That makes you an ignorant non-boxing fan-boy, like that ****head inbox.

Clownboy, tell me.....
when will pacroid grow some balls, stop using PED's, and take the test ?

[LeadUppercut]

Miguel Cotto.....

When Pacquiao fought Cotto, Miguel had just been destroyed by Margarito and then battered by Clottey. EVERY reputable trainer/reporter/analyst said that Cotto looked shop-worn and well-faded, and that he had been in too many wars.

Cotto was not on top of his game, he had begun to slide, he had no trainer to speak of, and was struggling with problems both in camp and at home relating to a family matter that affected his relationship with head trainer Evan Cotto.

Miguel was not on top of his game, and he most certainly was not in his prime..... plus, Pacquiao tried to drain him on the scales.

Listen to this reporter's take on the subject, shortly after the Clottey fight....

"I wasn’t exactly shocked to see Manny Pacquiao’s name being linked for a fight with Miguel Cotto after the Puerto Rican fighters disappointing performance last Saturday night against Joshua Clottey. As bad as Cotto looked in the fight, and believe me Cotto looked pretty awful, it seemed like a no brainer that Pacquiao would then select him as his next opponent.

But my question is why isn’t Pacquiao going after Shane Mosley or Paul Williams instead? Why the emphasis at fighting Cotto, when he was destroyed by Antonio Margarito last year? It seems to me the much better choice for Pacquiao would be to go after Mosley, since he beat Margarito a few months ago by a 9th round TKO.

Since Margarito has already stopped Cotto, the logical choice for Pacquiao to fight would be Mosley. That’s the bout that Pacquiao should be going after unless he wants to be considered a cherry picker."

Pacquiao saw that Cotto was ripe, so he jumped on him, but even the fact that Cotto had faded was not enough of an advantage for 27%..... so he demanded a catch-weight of 145lbs.

A catch-weight, for a title fight..... *** me, that is lame.

Cotto of course, flatly refused. Miguel stated "147 if you want my title, but no-title if you need a catchweight". Of course, 27% demanded a catchweight and the title, it became a sticking point to get the fight made, so Cotto was forced to concede.

But even that was not enough for 27%, he demanded 143, even though his trainer Freddie Roach agreed to 144. Luckily for Miguel he stuck to his guns, or those cherry-picking ****s would have dragged him down to 143lbs.....


Catch-weights.....

There are only two reasons to demand a catch-weight.....

1.) you are not good enough to compete with your opponent at his natural weight

2.) you are attempting to drain your opponent to gain an unfair advantage

Pacquiao tried to drain Cotto, because Manny had already fought at 147.

The 143lb demand was an absolute joke, they really tried to do a number on Cotto. Just because the bullet missed, does not lessen the intent.

Shame on 27% for cheating history, not once, but twice, because he did the same thing to Margarito..... Emmanuel Steward was correct when he said that Pacquiao is a cherry-picker who does not compare with truly great fighters.

What a lame b1tch that 27% kid turned out to be.

Shane Mosley.....

What can I say, this will be short and sweet..... that cherry-picking pu$$y Manny "padded" Pacquiao ducked Shane Mosley not once, but TWICE !!

Initially Mosley offered to go down to 142-143, then he offered to drop to 140, but still 27% would not front up and fight him.

Until that is, Shane was a year older, and had suffered a loss to Mayweather in which he looked like an old man, and an ugly draw with Sergio Mora.

Now, all of a sudden..... Shane's the man.

Who woulda thought, a boxer gets old and slow, and he strikes the payday.

WTF ?

Notice a pattern emerging ?

Shot.....
Hoya > Hatton > Cotto > Margarito > Shane..... then 40yo Marquez at 150 ?

What a fkn hype-job that 27% kid is.