LOL at floyd..........................................LMA O
-
-
you are quoting the *****Originally posted by LeadUppercut View PostYou *******s crack me up.....
[IMG]//blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/Gay*******.jpg[/IMG]
Comment
-
Gayweather is such a pathetic loser. He could've been great. But now all he'll be remembered for is being a broke wife beating coward.Comment
-
And he pokes people.Originally posted by SpitBalla View Post
And I also hear that he drags ho's around by their hair
Comment
-
Originally posted by LeadUppercut View PostAnd he pokes people.
And I also hear that he drags ho's around by their hair
I think I'm gonna wet myself, *** you guys are idiots
Comment
-
I hear that Jinkee just bought a new t-shirt ^^
Comment
-
Proof LeadUppercut is a mentally handicapped loser, hes actually talking to himself even on an internet forum.Originally posted by LeadUppercut View PostQuote:
Originally Posted by LeadUppercut View Post
And he pokes people.
And I also hear that he drags ho's around by their hair
I think I'm gonna wet myself, *** you guys are idiots
Seriously LeadUppercut, you must be one pathetic friendless loser to be here ALL THE TIME. And you're definitely a pathetic loser to actually RESPOND TO YOUR OWN post.
But I'm probably being too harsh. Because I genuinely believe you are mentally handicapped, its sad. I know you can't help it in real life, but talking to yourself on an internet forum is a dead giveaway that you're a ******.
And admitting you wet yourself isn't doing yourself any favors either. But mentally challenged people do have problems controlling their bladders, so its understandable.Last edited by SpitBalla; 04-06-2011, 05:58 AM.Comment
-
Hey **** you could right there, hold on man, I'll just go check....Originally posted by SpitBalla View Post
..... ummm, I just looked in the mirror, and I'm not sure ?
Could be
But I tell you what, it's better than being a *******.....
You must be the one at the backOriginally posted by LeadUppercut View Post
Comment
-
Do any of you flag-waving fan-boy's have a reply to the comment below ?
Or is boxing still something we don't talk about on this site ?
Miguel Cotto.....
When Pacquiao fought Cotto, Miguel had just been destroyed by Margarito and then battered by Clottey. EVERY reputable trainer/reporter/analyst said that Cotto looked shop-worn and well-faded, and that he had been in too many wars.
Cotto was not on top of his game, he had begun to slide, he had no trainer to speak of, and was struggling with problems both in camp and at home relating to a family matter that affected his relationship with head trainer Evan Cotto.
Miguel was not on top of his game, and he most certainly was not in his prime..... plus, Pacquiao tried to drain him on the scales.
Listen to this reporter's take on the subject, shortly after the Clottey fight....
"I wasn’t exactly shocked to see Manny Pacquiao’s name being linked for a fight with Miguel Cotto after the Puerto Rican fighters disappointing performance last Saturday night against Joshua Clottey. As bad as Cotto looked in the fight, and believe me Cotto looked pretty awful, it seemed like a no brainer that Pacquiao would then select him as his next opponent.
But my question is why isn’t Pacquiao going after Shane Mosley or Paul Williams instead? Why the emphasis at fighting Cotto, when he was destroyed by Antonio Margarito last year? It seems to me the much better choice for Pacquiao would be to go after Mosley, since he beat Margarito a few months ago by a 9th round TKO.
Since Margarito has already stopped Cotto, the logical choice for Pacquiao to fight would be Mosley. That’s the bout that Pacquiao should be going after unless he wants to be considered a cherry picker."
Pacquiao saw that Cotto was ripe, so he jumped on him, but even the fact that Cotto had faded was not enough of an advantage for 27%..... so he demanded a catch-weight of 145lbs.
A catch-weight, for a title fight..... *** me, that is lame.
Cotto of course, flatly refused. Miguel stated "147 if you want my title, but no-title if you need a catchweight". Of course, 27% demanded a catchweight and the title, it became a sticking point to get the fight made, so Cotto was forced to concede.
But even that was not enough for 27%, he demanded 143, even though his trainer Freddie Roach agreed to 144. Luckily for Miguel he stuck to his guns, or those cherry-picking ****s would have dragged him down to 143lbs.....
Catch-weights.....
There are only two reasons to demand a catch-weight.....
1.) you are not good enough to compete with your opponent at his natural weight
2.) you are attempting to drain your opponent to gain an unfair advantage
Pacquiao tried to drain Cotto, because Manny had already fought at 147.
The 143lb demand was an absolute joke, they really tried to do a number on Cotto. Just because the bullet missed, does not lessen the intent.
Shame on 27% for cheating history, not once, but twice, because he did the same thing to Margarito..... Emmanuel Steward was correct when he said that Pacquiao is a cherry-picker who does not compare with truly great fighters.
What a lame b1tch that 27% kid turned out to be
Shane Mosley.....
What can I say, this will be short and sweet..... that cherry-picking pu$$y Manny "padded" Pacquiao ducked Shane Mosley not once, but TWICE !!
Initially Mosley offered to go down to 142-143, then he offered to drop to 140, but still 27% would not front up and fight him.
Until that is, Shane was a year older, and had suffered a loss to Mayweather in which he looked like an old man, and an ugly draw with Sergio Mora.
Now, all of a sudden..... Shane's the man
Who woulda thought, a boxer gets old and slow, and he strikes the payday.
WTF ?
Notice a pattern emerging ?
Shot.....
Hoya > Hatton > Cotto > Margarito > Shane..... then 40yo Marquez at 150 ?
What a fkn hype-job that 27% kid is.Comment
Comment