Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who Won Pac-Bradley? Post fight discussion STOP MAKING NEW THREADS ABOUT THIS FIGHT.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    All of you are jumping WAY too far from "He wasn't completely dominated" to "He has a case for winning." No Bradley did not.

    It's okay that it was a robbery because it was Pac though, these things just happen. None of you are saying that during all these other robberies happening lately.

    Comment


      Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
      All of you are jumping WAY too far from "He wasn't completely dominated" to "He has a case for winning." No Bradley did not.

      It's okay that it was a robbery because it was Pac though, these things just happen. None of you are saying that during all these other robberies happening lately.
      What I find really funny though is that these people hate Pacquiao so much that they're using the same excuses the Pacstans did when Marquez lost last November.

      "You have to look at it round by round!"

      "It's all about activity!"

      It's the same excuses but different side.

      These people are not honest. It's just like frickin' politics to them. Keep in mind that most people at press row had Manny winning and winning comfortably. These people were not being swayed by the biased HBO commentary.
      Last edited by dbtayag; 06-12-2012, 05:31 AM.

      Comment


        ↑^^^^^^^^^^^ so you openly admit you bandwagon jump.

        Comment


          Like loaded wraps said. I buy and watch all boxing. I am a fan and support. Don't go talking that your a fan if you don't.

          I don't even like Pac and Bradley and still bought the fight.

          Comment


            Originally posted by J Dubb II 330 View Post
            ↑^^^^^^^^^^^ so you openly admit you bandwagon jump.
            I am a fan of boxing, and im a glory hunter. If your the best i support you, simple as that.

            I dont owe Pac anything.

            Comment


              Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
              im upset as you think im a fanboy. Im not, im a glory hunter, i like Pac as he is the best. I owe pac nothing and if he wasnt the best id drop him in an instant.

              If i thought Floyd was the best, id be his fanboy, but he dont fight and give me enough for me to support him. Im a glory hunter.
              If a football team is doing well i like them as well, until they start losing.

              No, i wont buy any PPV fights with robberires like that.
              Idiot.

              To be honest I'd probably buy it, although the sour taste that this fight has left in the mouths of boxing fans they would probably be better served not having it as a PPV.

              I won't hold my breath though it's Bob Arum after all.

              Fraduley has a better chance of beating both the Klitschko brothers in the same night than Bob Arum doing something good for the sport and its fans.

              Comment


                Originally posted by LoadedWraps View Post
                I'm buying it. Like every fight. I would get Marquez IV too. I support boxing, and I will watch and enjoy it, same with every PPV I can get my hands on.

                Yep, we aren't all touchy "time to boycott" fans.
                Buying the rematch does not support boxing it supports Arum the guy the boxing world is turning against and should have done long ago its pretty easy to figure out.

                Arum is bad for the sport if his next PPV fails maybe he will be forced to retire which will in turn be good for boxing.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
                  All of you are jumping WAY too far from "He wasn't completely dominated" to "He has a case for winning." No Bradley did not.

                  It's okay that it was a robbery because it was Pac though, these things just happen. None of you are saying that during all these other robberies happening lately.
                  I really believe Bradley had a case for winning the fight,1 to 3 imo Bradley won those rds..4 to 8 were Manny rds,I think Bradley took off those rds and was jabbing the way he was early in the fight...9 to 12 were Bradley rds again,he found his jab and his work rate again..Now I won't lie,rds 2 3 and 9 to 12 were close rds(well except for 10 I felt that was a clear Bradley rd)but Manny did not do enough throughout each rd..One rd Manny did not do anything until there was 40 secs on the clock,and because of a few lefts that seem to hit Bradley(because it did not look clear to me)Pac is suppose to win that rd??I had it close and tbh I know different people score different things..I could certainly see a case in which Bradley won this fight..

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Eric_Teaman View Post
                    LOL J dubb your just hating on Manny. If Bradley is a true winner would he say on the interview to let me see the tape to see if he really won the fight? Would he tell Arum sorry that he could not beat the man? LOL really pay attention and watched a lot of fight you can just observe the fighters body language being desperate and brocken down.
                    What fighter do you know says another fight is a stronger puncher or has a better chin then himself??Because Bradley also did that..Oh btw he beat the breaks off of the fighter he gave this credit to..He is a fairly honest fighter..

                    Comment


                      Bradley beat Pac the same way Pac beat Marquez

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP