Who Won Pac-Bradley? Post fight discussion STOP MAKING NEW THREADS ABOUT THIS FIGHT.

[hugh grant]

It is not just for Pacquiao.

It will help prevent future robberies in the sport of boxing.

Yes if anyone can set a presedent let it be Pac. In one hundred years people will look at this fight and will be a bad taste left in the mouth. There is no place in boxing with this result and it must be erased from the history books and peoples memories.

If the powers that be, can do something about it, they should do it? If you could help starving kids in africa youd do it wouldnt you?

[-Huey-]

LMAO at the Pactards' petition...

[Redd Foxx]

Sticky: Too much pac-bradley spam. Stop making new threads!!!! Post in the master thread!!!

reported

Lol, every thread I click on or has you hating on anyone who doesn't share your hatred for Pac. What a miserable life that must be.. .

[javysouthpaw]

This fight looked like a sparring session. Both guys were sloppy and Pacquiao seemed to be only working on his 1-2 all night long. There was no game plan and no domination from either guy. Pacquiao was slightly better in most rounds and had Bradley hurt but he never kicked it into high gear and took over the fight. Regardless of the bad decision this was a bad fight and I can't believe I spent $65 to see it.

[Republica]

Sure, David Díaz was a bigger threat than Humberto Soto lol.

PAC KTFOes Soto faster than Diaz if they fought!

[hugh grant]

bradleys a soldier and honourable, he dont want a win like this and give Pac his titles back.
Brad will get his rematch and the chance to avenge his loss fairly.

[ElBossHogg™]

CompuBox Has Hurt More Then Helped Boxing!

This is what ruining boxing, people who dont know how to score only look at punch stats. THIS DOES NOT PROVE ANYTHING. This was initially invented as commentary tool so the commentators to use in relaying ONE aspect of what is happening in the ring. This is not a end all and it is not even official. This is not scientific. This is not a machine. CompuBox is Human Beings that Are pressing a button every time they THINK a punch landed. Their is no way to confirm that a punch landed or did not land in this CompuBox system.

This CompuBox has grown into it own 'Almighty Boxing Judge' if you will. People are now using it to back up claims of robbery and to either agree or disagree with a decision. CompuBox only counts punches landed which is not even ONE of the 'Boxing Scoring Criteria' which is

1. Clean punching.
2. Effective aggressiveness.
3. Ring generalship.
4. Defense.

This tool CompuBox is merely a entertainment addition for the commentators. CompuBox hold no bearings on how you score a fight, NONE what so ever.

CompuBox should never be brought up when discussing how to score a fight.


CompuBox has hurt the sport in my honest opinion for the new generation of boxing fans, As they rely heavy on this tool when their is a close fight. For all the reason I have listed above it should not even be considered, yet they use CompuBox stats as a crutch to lean on when scoring. You can not use CompuBox for scoring as it does not fall into none of the Criteria for scoring a bout.

[Republica]

Nope. Ring Magazine currently has Pacquiao-Marquez III as "Robbery of the Year"

Ouch

PAC outlanded both Marquez and way more Bradley. Fact!

Marquez got robbed? RSMH

[!! Shawn]

First off, let me say I thought Pacquiao won the fight. But I had it closer than most people, I scored it 115-113 for Pac. Let me also say, I was at the fight live, not front row or anything but still had a pretty good view.

Now, the HBO crew thought the fight was onesided, and it reflected in their scoring and announcing. Now you can say that everyone in the media had it for Pacquiao as well. HOWEVER, nearly everyone in the media, like most of us, watched the fight on an HBO broadcast.

The judges obviously watched it live and not from HBO's perspective. Even Max Kellerman said that he polled people on pressrow and a lot thought Bradley won. Also, Brian Kenny, whose a pretty respected boxing guy, watched the fight on pressrow, scored it 116-112 for Bradley. Few others had it for Bradley as well.

My point is, isn't it interesting how the few people who thought Bradley won were also the people who were watching on pressrow, and not on HBO? If you do some research and look at the scores from media on pressrow, you'll see most had it very close, while the media that just watched it on HBO had it wide.

I know everyone on this board will dispel this and claim to be an unbiased boxing expert who calls it like it is, but you can't say when the crowd roars and Jim Lampley creams his pants everytime Pac throws a punch whether it lands or not, that anyone's perception wouldn't be affected.

anyway, just my 2 cents. thought Pac won a close decision, but felt this was no bigger a robbery than the Marquez fight

I completely agree with you. I scored the fight the same, 115-113 for Pacquiao, but... I was second guessing myself with the rounds I was giving to Bradley based largely on the HBO commentary. Every time Lampley would scream "BIG LEFT FOR PACQUIAO LANDS FLUSH!" I would think to myself, "thats not what I saw, but maybe he has a better angle".

Watching the fight back without the commentary I was much more secure in the rounds that I did score for Bradley, although I still scored the fight the same.

[hugh grant]

way to bring up mayweather in a pac thread. 43-0 lol did pacquiao win his last fight?

Pac mugged Bradley and took his unbeaten record for millions to see, and hopefully he can take Floyds unbeaten record next.

Pac is the unbeaten record killer.