the problem most of you guys have is you think the pound 4 pound rankings are some concrete titles that you win and you get to hold that title until you lose or whatever. It's also not necessarily entirely resume based.
It's simply who you think are the best fighters pound 4 pound in order from 1 to 10.
So the ring currently thinks, pound 4 pound, donaire is slightly better than martinez. That's it!
That's literally all there is to it. In that regard I agree with the Ring 100%. I believe Donaire is more talented of a fighter than Martinez, pound 4 pound. Now you can argue who has the better resume, ok go ahead. Doesn't change ****. If the pound 4 pound list was resume based Carl Froch would be #2 or #3 right now, not donaire or martinez.
It's simply who you think are the best fighters pound 4 pound in order from 1 to 10.
So the ring currently thinks, pound 4 pound, donaire is slightly better than martinez. That's it!
That's literally all there is to it. In that regard I agree with the Ring 100%. I believe Donaire is more talented of a fighter than Martinez, pound 4 pound. Now you can argue who has the better resume, ok go ahead. Doesn't change ****. If the pound 4 pound list was resume based Carl Froch would be #2 or #3 right now, not donaire or martinez.
Comment