<#webadvjs#>

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Arum: Marquez's Demands Offended Pacquiao, Killed Fight

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by [KLT] Kirby View Post
    Blah blah blah, I was skimming through and I saw a bunch the same typical ******* bullshit until I came here.

    Did Pacquiao have to prove himself at 147 to fight DLH? He came up from 135.

    Also, funny because Pacquiao came off a win against David Freaking Diaz, and somehow Pacquiao gets a shot at DLH?

    Stop using a double standard. You're pathetic.



    They pretty much hate everyone who attacks there god. They also most of the time can't provide valid arguments when it comes to debates. They always use "Floyd" blah blah because they're not smart enough to see the truth right before their eyes. The truth hurts them.
    didnt oscar hand-pick manny? im just saying...

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by [KLT] Kirby View Post
      Blah blah blah, I was skimming through and I saw a bunch the same typical ******* bullshit until I came here.

      Did Pacquiao have to prove himself at 147 to fight DLH? He came up from 135.

      Also, funny because Pacquiao came off a win against David Freaking Diaz, and somehow Pacquiao gets a shot at DLH?

      Stop using a double standard. You're pathetic.
      ODLH handpicked Pacquiao and chose to fight him at 147

      Comment


        #63
        JMM is notorious for this. Kinda hard not to believe Arum when I can think of 5-6 occasions when Marquez has pulled some **** like this.

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by fcastro1 View Post
          would you give someone that constantly talks about you and whinges aboutg you his biggest payday. I wouldnt. Why not let him equal his highest payday which is a substancial more than anyother fights he has has and prove his point. If he wins he can earn his millions.
          You don't even make sense. JMM said what he said because Arum did not want to give JMM a well deserved raise for the drama in their first fight. When JMM could not get a third fight with JMM, PAc came out and said that JMM only fights for money. WTF are you talking about lol...!!!??? Find out what JMM got for the two fights with PAc and see if what you wrote makes sense lol...

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by [KLT] Kirby View Post
            So let me get this straight, all because he thinks he won the fight(which most people do) that's somehow "disrespecting" him? Hmm, if this article is true, both Pacquiao and yourself have issues, and I suggest therapy. Or he could do the most logical thing. Prove Marquez wrong and finish him like all the Pacquiao fans say he's gonna do.
            disrespecting him is asking for too much money... shane & jmm make good b-side opponents, but shane is desperate enough to bend over backwards for the payday... jmm bent over backwards for floyd, he needs to do it again if he wants a payday with pac... in a boxing sense, he might feel equal to pac... but in a business sense, pac became a juggernaut... jmm's last fight was on hbo for free... pac fought a disgraced boxer for million+ ppv buys... CLEAR AS DAY. pac calls the shots on this one. jmm has no leverage for negotiations. the ONLY person who has the right to play hardball at the negotiation table with pac is floyd.

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by waxfondler View Post
              disrespecting him is asking for too much money... shane & jmm make good b-side opponents, but shane is desperate enough to bend over backwards for the payday... jmm bent over backwards for floyd, he needs to do it again if he wants a payday with pac... in a boxing sense, he might feel equal to pac... but in a business sense, pac became a juggernaut... jmm's last fight was on hbo for free... pac fought a disgraced boxer for million+ ppv buys... CLEAR AS DAY. pac calls the shots on this one. jmm has no leverage for negotiations. the ONLY person who has the right to play hardball at the negotiation table with pac is floyd.
              ^^^^
              everybody should read this.

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by Frank Ducketts View Post
                You don't even make sense. JMM said what he said because Arum did not want to give JMM a well deserved raise for the drama in their first fight. When JMM could not get a third fight with JMM, PAc came out and said that JMM only fights for money. WTF are you talking about lol...!!!??? Find out what JMM got for the two fights with PAc and see if what you wrote makes sense lol...
                i dont understand what you are talking about. Who messed up the second rematch when marquez refused 750g and fought chris john for 30g. Now if you were in pacs situation and a fighter that is bitter about his success and tarnishes him every chance he gets would you give him a payday. I wouldnt, only a biased man would say yes. Like i said he should accept what ever offer he gets because he has no leverage whatsoever. He wants to make millions beat pac first.

                Comment


                  #68
                  Everyone with solid boxing skills seems to have offended Pac and his people the last 15 years or so. Mayweather offended him with the USADA testing. JMM offended him by asking for too much money. I thought the rules of negotiations were start high? Wonder what Casamayor and Campbell did to offend Pac at lightweight? I guess he was offended by Paulie Ayala at 122 as well. And musta didn't like Mark Johnson's nickname or something. Because he damn sure didn't fight him at flyweight. These people are ****in' incredible. The only thing worse than Team Pacquaio are the Pacwh*res who defend this nonsense.

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by waxfondler View Post
                    disrespecting him is asking for too much money... shane & jmm make good b-side opponents, but shane is desperate enough to bend over backwards for the payday... jmm bent over backwards for floyd, he needs to do it again if he wants a payday with pac... in a boxing sense, he might feel equal to pac... but in a business sense, pac became a juggernaut... jmm's last fight was on hbo for free... pac fought a disgraced boxer for million+ ppv buys... CLEAR AS DAY. pac calls the shots on this one. jmm has no leverage for negotiations. the ONLY person who has the right to play hardball at the negotiation table with pac is floyd.
                    According to Arum, JMM didn't play hardball, his initial proposal was so offensive they walked. I thought the rules of negitiating were to start high. If you start high, you can eventually get to what you really want. I'm pretty sure Team JMM didn't pull what Team Pacquaio have continually done with Mayweather and say this is our proposal, take it or leave it. If they really wanted to fight JMM, they would have negotiated in good faith. Arum wanted Mosley because he wants to squeeze whatever drawing power Mosley has left in him out. Pac knows that JMM is a tough match-up for him, and would rather do something else. Adn that's what it came down to. This Mosley deal was in place before the opening bell for Pacquaio-Margarito even rang. Don't buy into the hype.

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by fcastro1 View Post
                      this is like the situation with ricky hatton and witter. Why give that punk a payday after tarnishing my image and legacy through the media. Thats what marquez has done over the years, he uses pacs name to sell his fights. You really think u can beat pac then accept the offer and beat him then make millions after.
                      You're exactly right. This is exactly like Hatton-Witter ebcause Pac is ducking JMM the way Hatton ducked Witter.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP