This is exactly why I got upset with a specific poster on here (Not gonna say his name) and this poster had the nerve to put alot of emphasis on titles, disgusting. Fact is, we hardcore fans know who the legit threats are. Beating a Martinez or Paul Williams would earn Pacquiao a much greater respect, and these two are title-less. Fuck belts, and I do agree Pacquiao is attempting to ease his way through history.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Time For Manny Pacquiao To Stop Cheating History
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by wengz2002 View PostIgnorant Fan!
The only weight that Pac hasn't fought the best is at Welterweight!
That's because Floyd Money "CHICKEN" Mayweather Jr. won't fight him!
Pac fought The Best at 126 lb in Barrera!
Pac fought The Best at 130 lb in Morales!
Pac fought The Best at 135 lb in Marquez!
Pac fought The Best at 140 lb in Hatton!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Akira Fudo View PostThis is exactly why I got upset with a specific poster on here (Not gonna say his name) and this poster had the nerve to put alot of emphasis on titles, disgusting.
Originally posted by Mr. Copeland View PostWhat point is there in facing Williams or Martinez at 154 when they have no belt?
Originally posted by Mr. Copeland View PostCool. Personally I think it's a waste of time for Manny to fight Willliams at 147 next because all we will hear is Williams is weight drained, or why didn't Manny fight him at 160 since his last 3-4 fights were there. Let Williams beat a top guy at 147 first so we know he is still good at that weight before we talk about a fight with Manny.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chuckguy View PostDiaz
Hatton
Cotto
and now Margs
all no defense
all lead with their head
none have speed
and all have limited footwork
when was the last time pac fought a boxer not a brawler?
Ill let you think about that one
Marquez - definitely not a brawler. March 2008
I'll let you think about ^^^^ this one.
Cotto has speed and definitely he is not with limited footwork. Mastered the basics pretty well and was busting Pac well when he boxed but reverted when he got tagged lots of times. Now why don't you think about this one too.
Again, who is this fighter pac fought over and over again in your last post?
Comment
-
-
If you think about it, he is rite on the money, the limit you impose does in fact create a weightclass. He is rite on the money(no pun intended). So by Pacquiao wanting that 150 "limit" he is indeed creating a "NEW" weightclass which does not exist in any of the major organizations.
Originally posted by Geze View Post
Who let this genius in here?.
Make sure he don't forget his helmet on the way out.
It's hard to explain something to this kind of people. From Burner to Imdazed.
They're all dazed inhaling Floyd's teeny weeny ball.(note ball)
Comment
-
I will never be a pro PAC fan. But I am a history major. And I can tell u one thing that will always hold true. History is always written by the winners, and it will be remembered the way it was written. Sad but true.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BoxingTech718 View PostIt's easy to say pac will beat this guy and that guy when he won't face them. Same thing we call Floyd out for, you have to be unbiased on call them both out for the same thing. To this date Manny has ducked Mosley, Paul Williams, Bradley, Raheem, and out of the 7 titles he has held probably defended them all of 3 times. Don't be a nutthugger call them both out.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostYou mean like this:
They love the paper titles don't they? Or this gem:
of course, it's ok to fight Margarito at a catchweight. And of course it's ok that Margarito didn't beat anyone of note so we could knopw he's still good
Brilliant! Classic Pwnage!
Comment
Comment