The Racism out of Pacquiao's Success is Di****able.

[And Still]

Dude if I offended you by making you believe that there's a comparison between racism towards blacks(or anyone else for that matter) and Filipinos then I apologize.

But my original post was not geared towards a comparison. It's about an athlete's success leading to racist remarks. Not racist agendas or a conglomerate agenda towards filipinos.

The athlete's success did not lead to racist remarks.

Floyd reired. Pac moved to #1 p4p. He then showed that he absolutely deserved that p4p slot. He got endorsements. Became a media darling. All the commentators loved him.

Floyd comes back. Floyd saya "let's take drug tests". pac balks. Ruh-Roh.

That is when the tide changed a bit. And what turned many people off was the groupthink of Pac fans and their assault on any intelligent dissent.

You can't present any type of "pac should take the test" argument without being called gay, ******, getting red K, or whatever the equivalent is on whatever forum you are on.

Karceno, bless his goofy heart, is being called the n-word daily.

[And Still]

****** NEGRO AMERICANS are jealous on PACQUIAO s success!

...and that is every day. on every board.

[Kagami Taiga]

why are you still hung up on racial historical prerequisites? I have already explained this to you. You do not need to have a racially persecuted history to be racist or to suffer racism. You have a very warped sense of logic in trying to put a round peg into a square peg in order to fit your agenda.

Human beings are tribal by nature are very nationalistic. We are just talking about boxing here. What did the african community ever do to the filipino community in terms of racism historically?

NOTHING. Yet filipinos are being racist on a internet forum because of a boxer. You get the picture? Human beings are just built that way. No need for a long history of racial atrocities to be racist or suffer racism in this day & age.

All it takes is a computer & internet connection. See mexicans vs puerto ricans boxing rivalry, see mexicans vs pacquiao rivalry, see the USA vs easter european boxing rivalry.

You dont need prerequisites.

u do realize ur wrong. whatever u say no matter what u say, race and racial divisions were created in the early modern period. it has continued to this day. but it has not been around as long as ppl think. its a concept invented in the early modern times as a means to justfy why eurpoeans should rule. in, lest say, the classincal era, there was very little racism. for instance, in rome, most of the roman citiznes were white. but there were a whole lot of citizens that werent, both white, asian, african, etc. and guess what??they were all either non-citizens or ****** with the same status. not based on raced not based on how they looked but based on their lesser status in society. so a black slave had the same status as a white slave who was of roman or greco descent regardless of their race. thats a fact. look it up. also u night want to look up alexander the great's legendary spread of helenism. all interesting and all show how race was not as big in the past as it is now

[Imhotep]

I love when the Filipinos say racist **** about blacks cause it gives me the excuse to say racist shhit back.

[And Still]

Check it. Here's a FB post:

NOW ADAM JUST HAVE TO WATCH HIS BACK WHEN HIS IN ONTARIO IMPROV ON APRIL 7 AND THE IRVINE IMPROV Thursday April 15th,Friday April 16th,Saturday April 17th AND Sunday April 18th & THE HOLLYWOOD IMPROV SATURDAY APRIL 24 2010 ALL IN CALI WOW IF I WHERE YOU ADAM YOU SHOULD HIRE SOME TYPE OF BODYGUARD'S COZ FILIPINO'S ARE SOME REAL VIOLENT PEOPLE...

How is that going to end well?

[Hannibal Barca]

u do realize ur wrong. whatever u say no matter what u say, race and racial divisions were created in the early modern period. it has continued to this day. but it has not been around as long as ppl think. its a concept invented in the early modern times as a means to justfy why eurpoeans should rule. in, lest say, the classincal era, there was very little racism. for instance, in rome, most of the roman citiznes were white. but there were a whole lot of citizens that werent, both white, asian, african, etc. and guess what??they were all either non-citizens or ****** with the same status. not based on raced not based on how they looked but based on their lesser status in society. so a black slave had the same status as a white slave who was of roman or greco descent regardless of their race. thats a fact. look it up. also u night want to look up alexander the great's legendary spread of helenism. all interesting and all show how race was not as big in the past as it is now

You're exactly right. Come to think of it, ancient Egypt, which in my opinion fathered modern society; was open to people of all races and ethic backgrounds. In fact, even the ***s, who were enslaved for sometime could attain any title or position in Egypt short of Pharaoh.

Even the Native Americans had no sense of race when the Europeans stumbled upon America.

[dakoNYCaso]

dude, now ur makin stuff up. ive studied every american war and america has never adopted a policy where they killed ppl in such an indiscriminate manner. theres no factual truth to that. u find it, u show it to me. furthermore where did u get these casualty figures from. there is no way a million ppl died during that war ,just not possible. at the time that war happened that would have been nearly 1/4th of their population. such a mass genocide would hev been on the level of what happened to the ***s in ww2 in scale. it just aint possible. im sure u have deep feelings about what happened. but lets not go overboard.

Ok...what will I get if I educate you???

Philippine military deaths are estimated at 20,000 with 16,000 actually counted, while civilian deaths numbered between 250,000 and 1,000,000 Filipinos.[8] These numbers take into account those killed by war, malnutrition, and a cholera epidemic that raged during the war

Smallman-Raynor, Matthew; Andrew D Cliff (January 1998), "The Philippines Insurrection and the 1902–4 cholera epidemic: Part I — Epidemiological diffusion processes in war", Journal of Historical Geography 24 (1): 69–89, doi:10.1006/jhge.1997.0077

ordered by General Jacob Hurd Smith, who reportedly ordered his men to kill everyone over ten years old. To his credit, Major Littleton Waller countermanded it to his own men.

And there is so much more...

Have you ever read the book "white man's burden"???

That was basically about racism policies in the Philippines.

[Hannibal Barca]

****** NEGRO AMERICANS are jealous on PACQUIAO s success!

See what we mean?

[And Still]

Ok...what will I get if I educate you???



Smallman-Raynor, Matthew; Andrew D Cliff (January 1998), "The Philippines Insurrection and the 1902–4 cholera epidemic: Part I — Epidemiological diffusion processes in war", Journal of Historical Geography 24 (1): 69–89, doi:10.1006/jhge.1997.0077







And there is so much more...

Have you ever read the book "white man's burden"???

That was basically about racism policies in the Philippines.

Are you implying causation?

Because Cholera was killing people back then anyway.

[dakoNYCaso]

i think he is right

How many Mexicant heros Pac destroyed again???hahahah!!!