Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

An Unbiased Look At Pacquiao-Mayweather

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by cuauhtemoc1496 View Post
    It's IRONIC that Floyd is fighting a guy who actually tested positive for steroids considering he refused to fight a guy because he SUSPECTED him of doing steroids.

    The fact that Mosley tested for them is irrelevant, the irony is that he's fighting him to begin with........




    Apparently Mosley taking the test that Pacquiao's team refused means nothing to you which explains why you keep ignoring my question. How is it ironic that Mayweather is fighting a guy that agreed to the test opposed to not fighting a boxer that refused the testing? That shouldn't be hard to figure out for most people.

    Comment


      Originally posted by O.S.I.R.I.S View Post
      Honestly if you cant comprehend what I'm talking about, I really don't know what else to tell you. I mean you asked a question, and I answered it accordingly. You asked who would use it and I answered. You asked what was extreme endurance...and I answered.


      The endurance needed for cycling is above and beyond what is needed for boxing. Endurance plays a bigger factor in those guys winning than in boxing and its not even close. So to compete at the highest level, when your competetion are the most conditioned athletes in the world by far....some guys feel the need to take it to the extreme....which is why EPO use is huge in that sport.


      The worst conditioned cyclist has endurance that is above and beyond any boxer and it's not even up for debate.
      Your argument is based on opinion. Extreme endurance and all of that. EPO is used by boxers as well - ****, Shane Mosley used EPO. So regardless of what you think its value may be...it's irrelevant!

      Comment


        Look No Ceilings, I have been wanting to son your ass for a long time because you're a phony Paul Williams fans as far as I'm concerned. Who wins, Paul or Floyd?

        You said Mosley was better than anyone Pacquiao ever fought. Yet Pacquiao destroyed a guy that beat Mosley. Then you argued Cotto was past his prime. I stated that Pacquiao would beat down Cotto at any point, one fight doesn't ruin someones career, unless you're a ***** boxing fan of the new generation. Look at the wars Robinson, Hagler, Leonard, Duran, Louis, Ali, Frazier etc. fought. They always came back just as good if not better. Cotto would of always had problems with Clottey, and he would of always got smashed by Pacquiao. Yet he OUTBOXED Mosley despite fading late like he always does. So no, you're wrong, Mosley is not better than anyone Pacquiao has fought. There are a few guys P4P that are better than Mosley and are on Pacquiao's resume. Stop it slime.

        Comment


          Originally posted by O.S.I.R.I.S View Post
          Pac beat Barrera and Marquez in there prime, so I don't get what you are saying.
          He didnt beat Marquez in his prime.

          Comment


            Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
            He didnt beat Marquez in his prime.
            When was Marquez' prime? And if that's the case, why the **** would Floyd fight him at a higher weight AFTER that? Hahaha stop it slime.

            Comment


              Originally posted by FaustoGeraci View Post
              When was Marquez' prime? And if that's the case, why the **** would Floyd fight him at a higher weight AFTER that? Hahaha stop it slime.
              How is that relevant? Marquez was past his prime and fat when Floyd fought him.

              Comment


                Originally posted by FaustoGeraci View Post
                Look No Ceilings, I have been wanting to son your ass for a long time because you're a phony Paul Williams fans as far as I'm concerned. Who wins, Paul or Floyd?

                You said Mosley was better than anyone Pacquiao ever fought. Yet Pacquiao destroyed a guy that beat Mosley. Then you argued Cotto was past his prime. I stated that Pacquiao would beat down Cotto at any point, one fight doesn't ruin someones career, unless you're a ***** boxing fan of the new generation. Look at the wars Robinson, Hagler, Leonard, Duran, Louis, Ali, Frazier etc. fought. They always came back just as good if not better. Cotto would of always had problems with Clottey, and he would of always got smashed by Pacquiao. Yet he OUTBOXED Mosley despite fading late like he always does. So no, you're wrong, Mosley is not better than anyone Pacquiao has fought. There are a few guys P4P that are better than Mosley and are on Pacquiao's resume. Stop it slime.
                So you telling me that Tony didn't ruin Miguel?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                  Your argument is based on opinion. Extreme endurance and all of that. EPO is used by boxers as well - ****, Shane Mosley used EPO. So regardless of what you think its value may be...it's irrelevant!
                  Thanks for not replying to my other post. The bottom line is it would be just as traceable 24 days out as it would 14. And HGH is traceable 84 days out. So whatever point you are attempting to make is ******.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by FaustoGeraci View Post
                    When was Marquez' prime? And if that's the case, why the **** would Floyd fight him at a higher weight AFTER that? Hahaha stop it slime.
                    Nice ownage

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by COACH-WEBB View Post
                      So you telling me that Tony didn't ruin Miguel?
                      No. Cotto was getting dropped by journeymen and almost knocked out by light fisted JWWs long before that.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP