Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

An Unbiased Look At Pacquiao-Mayweather

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    An Unbiased Look At Pacquiao-Mayweather

    I have avoided this topic since it began, mostly because it was and is beaten to death. But after reading many people claim Pacquiao ducked Mayweather, I felt the need to post this and see what others thought.

    First of all, I am a bigger Pacquiao fan than Mayweather. I own both career sets on DVD, and if Mayweather had of stayed with the same style he utlized at Jr. LW and LW, hands down Floyd would be my guy. Regardless, I have a lot of respect for both. They are clearly superior to the majority of their peers.

    However, to claim Pacquiao is ducking Mayweather is fairly comical. Since Mayweather moved up in weight, he has hand picked nearly all of his opponents. His "fights" vs De La Hoya and Marquez were hard to watch, even for a hardcore fan. I appreciate the mastery in which he conducts his craft, shutting down opponents and not getting hit. However, his offense is horrible, and his pot shotting is also a disgrace to his talents. His performance vs Corrales (RIP) shows what he is capable of, but he would rather coast and put the audience to sleep.

    From his interviews you can see he is in awe of Pacquiao's talents. Claiming he "has to be on something to be doing what he's doing" etc. shows where Floyd's head is at. Talking about the possibility of "dieing in the ring" are comments I have never, throughout Floyd's career, heard him discuss. Demanding olympic style drug tests is bull****. Not the idea itself (it would be great if olympic tests were as accurate as people think, they are not, i.e. Usain Bolt, but still are better than the commission tests). The problem with Floyd demanding that is it sets a precedent for boxers to go outside of their own sanctioning bodies and create their own rules. Hence, making the boxer bigger than the sport.

    There is no way Pacquiao is ducking the test. You don't agree to 21 days and say no to 14 because you fear a fail, it's posturing over Mayweather's desire to make himself bigger than the sport. Different cultures bring different beliefs, and Pacquiao is of the age old Phillipino tradition that believes blood loss (even a small dose) makes you weak. It's mental, it's documented, and it should be respected. He was willing to do a test right after the fight as well, so to think he is somehow scared of Mayweather or the test is fairly ludicrous.

    Listening to Roger and the rest of the Mayweather clan talk about Pacquiao being on some "secret drug the Phillipino military uses to walk through bullets"" etc. shows you where the true fear lies. If this fight does not get made, it is because Mayweather somewhere along the line (I think the Judah fight where he was getting it for the first 5 rounds) lost his supreme confidence. Look at his performance vs De La Hoya. Even against Hatton before the KO. I expect Floyd to walk through Mosley (a fight he conveniently takes after Mosley has been inactive for 16 months) but I don't expect Floyd to ever take on Pacquiao. As long as he can play the steroid card and make ridiculous demands outside of his own sporting sanctions he will avoid the fight. And the saddest part is the sheep that eat it up and allow him to do so.

    #2
    Anyone who states there unbiased is more then likely biased. Nive try though.

    Comment


      #3
      Last time I checked nice is spelt with a ''c'', and thanks for touching on absolutely nothing in the original post. Neither one of these guys pay my bills, so why would I care one way or the other in a personal manner? I have a life thanks.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by FaustoGeraci View Post
        Last time I checked nice is spelt with a ''c'', and thanks for touching on absolutely nothing in the original post. Neither one of these guys pay my bills, so why would I care one way or the other in a personal manner? I have a life thanks.
        Speaking of checked, you need to check your facts.

        Comment


          #5
          thats all b.s.!!!! pac is on something and now we all know it! Boxing needs this fight not 2 mention both camps would've made $40million! yeah blood loss would make him weak cuz he wont b able 2 dope. If he's clean theres no reason the fight shouldnt happen.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
            Speaking of checked, you need to check your facts.
            Yeah? In what way?

            1. Pacquiao has taken on tougher opponents.

            2. Athletes have been beating olympic drug testing for years.

            3. No boxer is bigger than the sanctioning bodies.

            4. Mayweather and his family are obviously impressed with Pacquiao's accomplishments to the point they think he "HAS" to be on something.

            5. Legends like the guy in my av would never ***** out, steroids or not. They had an extreme self belief and would of taken the fight regardless.

            6. Floyd's offense has diminished greatly in the last 5 years.

            7. Pacquiao is the star of boxing, not Mayweather, and also #1 P4P. Mayweather should want to beat him.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by da beatdown View Post
              thats all b.s.!!!! pac is on something and now we all know it! Boxing needs this fight not 2 mention both camps would've made $40million! yeah blood loss would make him weak cuz he wont b able 2 dope. If he's clean theres no reason the fight shouldnt happen.
              One week (21 days to 14) would not be able to mask his doping if that was the case. Neither would a blood test after the fight. Nice try though.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by FaustoGeraci View Post
                One week (21 days to 14) would not be able to mask his doping if that was the case. Neither would a blood test after the fight. Nice try though.
                First of all, it was 24 days not 21. Secondly, it is enough time. Nice try though.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                  First of all, it was 24 days not 21. Secondly, it is enough time. Nice try though.
                  Olympic drug testers don't take blood from the athletes 30 days prior to the Olympics because of athletes refusal due to feeling weak. They take random tests up to the 30 days, and right after. 24 or 21, it still exceeds the Olympics own policy, and PEDs cannot disappear (the ones they can even detect that is) within 14 days. They stay for up to three months and no less than 45 days, hence the Olympic policy, nice try though. (The ones that don't have masking agents which will hide them anyways, which unfortunately 80% do)

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by FaustoGeraci View Post
                    Olympic drug testers don't take blood from the athletes 30 days prior to the Olympics because of athletes refusal due to feeling weak. They take random tests up to the 30 days, and right after. 24 or 21, it still exceeds the Olympics own policy, and PEDs cannot disappear (the ones they can even detect that is) within 14 days. They stay for up to three months and no less than 45 days, hence the Olympic policy, nice try though. (The ones that don't have masking agents which will hide them anyways, which unfortunately 80% do)
                    False on every count. Sheesh. Listen, before we start this debate go do some research. Are you making this stuff up? Because you're so off on your points that it's hilarious.

                    I'm tired of ignorant fans making statements like this one. Anyone want to take over for me?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP