Originally posted by decipher
View Post
-
I'm not coming at you directly because others have posted this same message! But PAC didn't duck Shane! He took a fight against the man that beat Shane! And I Dont think anyone should slam him for that! It's like poeple hear/read something and run with it before even thinking! Why fight Shane if you can fight the man that beat shane? True maybe his team thought cotto was the easier fight but cotto was a 1 loss belt holder and a damn stiff challenge in peoples mind for PAC, he deserved the shot just as much as Shane did! Shane would have been a worthy opponent no doubt but he didn't get ducked! The guy that beat him got his spot and that's what boxing SHOULD be about -
this is freddy roaches way of saying " well only fight mosley if were backed into a corner otherwise we wont risk it" mosley by tkoComment
-
see this is why pacfans have no credibility, PAC ABSOLUTLEY DUCKED SHANE, AND HE DUCKED HIM IN A VERY PUBLIC WAY!!! mosley was even willing to go to 140lbs!!!! instead pac chose a shot ass cotto, dont even say pac didnt duchk shane because its very very well documented that he did. pac had a choice shane or cotto, cotto was cut and lookedlike **** against clottey so naturally pac takes the easier guy. why do you have to lie??? Its not like you can change history its on record pac nor his team wanted mosley at all. they know thats a real real risk, they know theres a very god chance mosley will ko pac not just beat him , otherwise this fight wouldve gone down already.Originally posted by bray26 View PostComment
-
also shane beat the guy by ko, that absolutley DESTROYED COTTO, SO your point is moot. cotto wasnt anywhere nearly the type of risk shane is . after what shane did to margarito whom was considered the best welter at the time face it pac just didnt want any. margaritos balls are bigger than pacs will ever be that much is clear, margarito already beat cotto and clottey, plus has faced williams and coutless others that pac would never even consider fighting. pac is manuvered as impressive as he is, hasnt risked it since jmm.Originally posted by bray26 View PostComment
-
Mosley's gonna KO Slick****weather. Or make him QUIT like his Uncle did against the great Chavez.
Pac and Mosley in the FALL !!!!!!!!!Comment
-
-
[QUOTE=boxingfan76;7527234]also shane beat the guy by ko, that absolutley DESTROYED COTTO, SO your point is moot. cotto wasnt anywhere nearly the type of risk shane is . after what shane did to margarito whom was considered the best welter at the time face it pac just didnt want any. margaritos balls are bigger than pacs will ever be that much is clear, margarito already beat cotto and clottey, plus has faced williams and coutless others that pac would never even consider fighting. pac is manuvered as impressive as he is, hasnt risked it since jmm.[/
ok, man where to begin! First off my post is not in support of PAC! It's about the logic of some posters! I'll use your logic, PAC ducked Shane! In my my ost I admitted Shane was a very worthy opponent! But the fact of the matter is he lost his fight with cotto! On his record there is an L there! This is y records exist and rankings! So now we have cotto losing to Margarito! That makes it 1. Margarito 2. Cotto 3. Shane in the pecking order! Since Shane and margarito fought and Shane beat him u want to make him defacto #1. well u can't. Just like a tie in football you go to the head to head matchup in which Shane lost! So the next person in line to get a shot a PAC is cotto! Period! Take your emotion out of it and what you think! Maybe cotto is shot, it shouldn't matter, if he his, he's shot for being in that ring and bleeding for his place at the table to be in a position to earn that payday fighting PAC! And since Margarito was suspended and your choices are shane and cotto! Cotto should get the fight! Who the hell cares what you think! Guys fight to win their place allow a fighter that! Instead of seeing it as who got ducked see it as one one fighter gettin his due! That's what I'm saying! Take the hate out your heart and see a bigger picture! That's all I'm trying to get across in my postComment
-
-
and why your at it, change pacquiao's name to Manny "Im afraid of needles", i'll take blood test but not random", "we'll except random drug test only if there's a cut off date, "I rather fight in court instead of collecting 40mil and taking out my frustration on the man who allegedly spread these "false accusation" Pacquiao. To make it short, I just call him Manny Random, and people know who im talking about. LMAO, Truth of the matter be told the way his camp changes his stance on random blood testing makes him look more guilty than mayweather's proposal ever did.Originally posted by TNTLEFTHOOK View PostComment
-
Whats up with Roach always saying Pac will fight so in so later on........isnt Pac gonna be running for public office in the philippenes?Comment
Comment