Was Dirrell-Froch the biggest robbery of 2009?

[Method Checker]

I still don't know how some people can even dare attempt to say that Froch won it. Dirrell truly outclassed Froch and made him his *****.

[-EAGLE-]

i think it would be diaz vs malignaggi I. some say it could have gone eather way but i had Pauli (i HATE him!) winning clearly.

[NorvernRob]

Dirrell didn't deserve **** for the way he pussied around in that fight. He will have learned a valuable lesson from it - that constant holding, turning your back, falling on your knees and moaning to the ref doesn't score you any points.

[BetterCallSaul]

No. It was a very close fight. One maybe two rounds in it either way.

Froch is a beast!!!

[Method Checker]

Dirrell didn't deserve **** for the way he pussied around in that fight. He will have learned a valuable lesson from it - that constant holding, turning your back, falling on your knees and constantly complaining to the ref doesn't score you any points.

So landing three times the amount of punches than the other guy doesn't you win a fight? Please.. most of Froch's punches were landed on the back of the head.

[S.G.]

Yeah. It was ridiculous.

[the niggest]

No Diaz-Malignaggi 1 was the biggest robbery of 2009 BY FAR. Dirrell-Froch comes second.

[GODd*ll*nGer]

I still don't know how some people can even dare attempt to say that Froch won it. Dirrell truly outclassed Froch and made him his *****.

Damn if that reel was the whole story or a good deal of it, Dirrell beat Carl Froch the fu ck up.

[Spray_resistant]

I guess holding in excess, flailing around, intentionally falling to the floor, and getting manhandled by your opponent.....all while landing more ineffective pitty pat shots than your opponent= dominant victory

It was a close fight and Dirrell didn't show enough aggression throughout to get the nod.

[Makavelli Jr.]

The mere Fact that Froch landed like 5 punches in this fight leads me to believe it was a robbery. Everyone I was watching with it agreed, and we went in wanting Froch to win.