Unbiased Mom On Pacquiao: "Guilty As Hell"

[Mikhnienko]

So lets get this straight, you asked a women her opinion on something that doesn't have to do with a kitchen and expect us to give a ****? Utter fail.

[FLY TY]

Like I mentioned, agreeing to the test won't prove anything. He won't be found positive because what sane man would use ped in that kind of scrutiny? Just for once think of something that makes sense.

agreeing to the test, and coming up clean, looks a lot better, and makes more sense in the court of public opinion, and also will go a lot further in a court of law..........


THAN



not agreeing to the tests, and throwing away 40 million dollars b/c of it.
don't give a **** how much money you have, if you're willing to throw away 40 million dollars, over a 10 day window dispute about random drug testing, it makes you look worse, and you need ot stop wasting taxpayer dollars by filing frivolous lawsuits......

[AKATheMack]

agreeing to the test, and coming up clean, looks a lot better, and makes more sense in the court of public opinion, and also will go a lot further in a court of law..........


THAN



not agreeing to the tests, and throwing away 40 million dollars b/c of it.
don't give a **** how much money you have, if you're willing to throw away 40 million dollars, over a 10 day window dispute about random drug testing, it makes you look worse, and you need ot stop wasting taxpayer dollars by filing frivolous lawsuits......

By demanding the tests and willing to throw away 40mil over a 10 day dispute also makes Floyd look like a coward.

[FLY TY]

So lets get this straight, you asked a women her opinion on something that doesn't have to do with a kitchen and expect us to give a ****? Utter fail.

wake up man, this isn't the 1800's or even the 1940's for that matter....

there are plenty GUYS on this site, that watch boxing, and post **** that makes it look like they have no clue as to what's going on.....


the fact that it's an opinion of a woman, doesn't make it any less noteworthy. it's 2010.

[SugarRayRob]

wow get floyds nuts outa your mouth this has gotta be a joke right?

who the **** asked for your mums opinion, i dont ask her if she likes to spit or swallow before i shove my **** in her mouth so why would i care what she thinks about boxing?

[lee majors]

There's no such thing as objectivity. Everyone has built in intrinsic biases.

Just cuz' she popped a kid out of her "vag" doesn't make her any less biased than anyone else.

Man, you tacky ass hell!!!

[BabeLazy]

Like always, people go away from the topic at hand, bring up issues about Floyd, or crack jokes, instead of giving a valid opinion. It never fails.

Rather Pac is on something or not, he's look suspect and guilty. Put yourself in his shoes. Would you turn down 30 million because of you're pride or would you take the test, to prove people wrong and make the fight happen?

You want valid reason when post deos not even implied a valid reasoning. First, you want Pacman to prove he is not on roids after he was accused by May sr, a convicted drug trafficker who spent 5 years in jail. second: why not let the accuser prove that Pacman is on roids instead? Don't you think that you can resolve this matter rather fast since May Sr knows more about drugs? Why is the burden of proof landed on Pacman? You are obviously not a fair man.

Supposed somebody accussed you of being a "CHILD ******ER" (though you're not), and the issue was publishsized all over the world. How do you
prove that you are innocent? or Don't you want your accuser to prove that your a child ******er instead? Another thing, whats the $30Mil got to do with this issue? This issue is about a man's character, his legacy and achievements being tarnished because of some convicted drug trafficker, conspired with his son and promoters to destroy Pacman by any means. Your not thinking right and I dont think you are a prudent and rational man. So if we call you a CHILD ******ER (with no evidence) every time you log on, would you like that?

I'll wait..

[Mikhnienko]

wake up man, this isn't the 1800's or even the 1940's for that matter....

there are plenty GUYS on this site, that watch boxing, and post **** that makes it look like they have no clue as to what's going on.....


the fact that it's an opinion of a woman, doesn't make it any less noteworthy. it's 2010.

Tell your mom i'll be by later tonight

[BabeLazy]

wake up man, this isn't the 1800's or even the 1940's for that matter....

there are plenty GUYS on this site, that watch boxing, and post **** that makes it look like they have no clue as to what's going on.....


the fact that it's an opinion of a woman, doesn't make it any less noteworthy. it's 2010.

WOW; So you are very old; 1800 - 1940.. what the hell do you know about those eras? You must be McCloud, the highlander. It does make less, noteworthy, because the woman you are talking about dont know about the topic. she don't know that character ot the people who accused Pacman. Why don't you ask this question instead. " Hello mom, who would you believe, a man who was convicted drug trafficker who accused a #1P4P of roids but never tested positive or Pacman,the accusee who never badmouthed any of his opponents?"

[BabeLazy]

Tell your mom i'll be by later tonight

NO way, she is still kneeling in front of me. Take a number.