Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

W. KlitschkO Fight Predictions

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Bozo_no_no

    continue to look silly.
    Only to you, but you look silly to everyone else.

    See, I pointed out one thing, against my will, because like I said, I don't have to, and now you say I'm subject hopping. How about just saying "here's where DK said he didn't want options"
    or "here's why VK is scared of fighting Ruiz, Byrd, or Toney"(laughable) because yes you did imply that he is ducking them, as we both know no fighter would duck another fighter he knew he could beat, when there's a belt to be had. That's it, I'm not looking for anymore stuff, you are still clinging to that **** I posted when I was ****ing with you, that **** from yesterday. Keep hanging on to the past, and I'll still be here in the present.
    Last edited by hollister; 04-13-2005, 02:45 PM.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
      LMAO!

      It was a clear as day that you believed I said that



      Was it?

      Oh, that's right, it was only clear to you, because I never said that. But you know what, it doesn't matter, you may as well have said it, because you damn sure jumped on Sac's sack for posting it, and it's clear it was your sentiment as well.

      Comment


        Originally posted by hollister
        That's it, I'm not looking for anymore stuff, you are still clinging to that **** I posted when I was ****ing with you, that **** from yesterday. Keep hanging on to the past, and I'll still be here in the present.

        Translation: "I'm tired of you pointing out how ****** I looked yesterday by mentioning how I lied and couldn't provid examples of anything I accused you of".


        That's fine, I can live with that.


        As for the other subject (the one you are mentioning now to change away from the one you didn't have a leg to stand on in)

        I said Rahman is a weak fight for Vitali Klitschko to be taking when both Byrd and Ruiz were available and looking to unify.

        Byrd challenged Klitschko live on Fox's best damn sports show period to a remtach to unify their titles.

        Ruiz posted several open challenges:




        Instead of trying to work out an opportunity with King to unify against Ruiz or Byrd, he worked with King (King promotes Rahman) to put together a Rahman fight. Again, Rahman is a fighter Ruiz already beat clearly.

        Its my opinion he should have taken options for King to co promote future fights should he win (as he's going to have to do that eventually) and take a step up to unify the titles.
        Last edited by Bozo_no no; 04-13-2005, 03:04 PM.

        Comment


          Originally posted by hollister
          Was it?

          Oh, that's right, it was only clear to you, because I never said that. But you know what, it doesn't matter, you may as well have said it, because you damn sure jumped on Sac's sack for posting it, and it's clear it was your sentiment as well.

          lol, so now you're going to slight me for making things up and saying you said them?

          That's YOUR specialty.

          You went on and on about that comment I never made, and held it like a ***** card. When you realized I never said it, you got suddenly quiet about it.

          So far, all you've done is (without justification) said you were very upset with things I didn't say, lied about what I did say, and refuse to back up anything you say.

          Like I said, one of the more pathetic chain of events I've ever seen anyone take.
          Last edited by Bozo_no no; 04-13-2005, 03:05 PM.

          Comment


            E. Castillo by KO: 2NdRoUnDkO, Arrington, Bozo_no_no, Colonel Jones, dansweeney, joeboxer, Mayweatherfan, Munn, tnf1400

            I don't get it. You say that Castillo is a soft opponent, and then you say that he will KO Wlad. You make no sense at all.

            Everyone please stop feeding this troll.
            Last edited by Neuraxis; 04-13-2005, 03:51 PM.

            Comment


              Good movie for Eliseo to see:



              I heard Eliseo was a great fan of cartoons:



              I am sure he likes to read books as well:



              He is going to need them against the big powerpunching pimp.



              | |

              Comment


                Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
                Translation: [I]"I'm tired of you pointing out how ****** I looked yesterday by mentioning how I lied and couldn't provid examples of anything I accused you of".
                How could I possibly more ****** than a no-spelling, no-typing, no english-speaking moron that thinks he's slick because he wiggles out of arguments by putting a spin on words and hides behind what he did or didn't actually say instead of owning up to what he meant, and to top it all off, lusts after Jay Nady?


                Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
                I said Rahman is a weak fight for Vitali Klitschko to be taking when both Byrd and Ruiz were available and looking to unify.

                Byrd challenged Klitschko live on Fox's best damn sports show period to a remtach to unify their titles.

                Ruiz posted several open challenges:




                Instead of trying to work out an opportunity with King to unify against Ruiz or Byrd, he worked with King (King promotes Rahman) to put together a Rahman fight. Again, Rahman is a fighter Ruiz already beat clearly.

                Its my opinion he should have taken options for King to co promote future fights should he win (as he's going to have to do that eventually) and take a step up to unify the titles.
                That's ****ing ******, and you know it. DK's willing to sacrifice a fighter who has no belt, and that many think will lose anyway with no options, but there's no way in hell he's going to sacrifice one of his milk cows (that's exactly what he'd be doing) without a way to keep his finger in the pie. (translation, especially for you: in order to fight one of King's title holders, he'd most likely have to give King some control over his career, since he'll most likely win, and that way King would continue to make a princely sum in future fights for VK's labors. However, King would be willing to allow Rahman to fight VK without all the bull**** options because Rahman doesn't have a belt, and probably wouldn't keep one long if he ever did win it again, so King realizes Rahman wouldn't be long-term cash cow anyway.) Now, Explain to me why the **** VK needs to fight those two so much, he's not the undisputed champ, but he's the recognized champ. Lord knows that if King doesn't have 51% control over VK, hell is going to freeze over before VK fights either one of them. Chris Byrd is full of ****, he has challenged both of the Klits and when Wlad tried to fight him, he wiggled out of it. He knows he was losing that first fight big time, and if he ever crosses ways with VK again, he'll fade right back into obscurity, and I don't think Ruiz and his idiot trainer could last long enough with VK to get one of his many "gift decisions". So, why is VK going to have to work with DK again? and why is Rahman such a weak fight? He knocked Lennox senseless with one shot, and has the reach to do it, as well as a jab. You asked for proof that DK was demanding options on VK, I asked you for proof that he wasn't. I'll say it more clearly, I think that DK was the factor in the fight not happening, not Ruiz or Byrd. At least Guru came up with something, you just came up with your opinion, exactly what you were accusing guru of. Come on man, I'm giving you fresh ammo and you're still hanging onto that stale **** from yesterday lol. What, scared to lay your "***** card" down? lol

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
                  lol, so now you're going to slight me for making things up and saying you said them?

                  That's YOUR specialty.

                  You went on and on about that comment I never made, and held it like a ***** card. When you realized I never said it, you got suddenly quiet about it.

                  So far, all you've done is (without justification) said you were very upset with things I didn't say, lied about what I did say, and refuse to back up anything you say.

                  Like I said, one of the more pathetic chain of events I've ever seen
                  Funny you feel that way, because you were the factor that probably played the biggest part in it taking place. You're one of those idiots that pride themselves in their ability to spin arguments around and feel like they made the other person look or feel ******, whether they are right or wrong. I was just ****ing with you yesterday because I knew you would continue to respond, and so far it's held true. It's true I got pissed about the KD thing, because I knew it didn't mean ****, but after that, I gave up on argueing logic with any hater like you, especially after I started looking at your spelling. But now I'm ready to redeem myself and showcase my ability to debate through logic and facts, even if you continue on the way you have, others will see my points and agree or debate them. Before you even start, I don't care to see your ****** smart alleck comments, you answer my questions directly and I'll answer yours.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Runw/knives
                    Good movie for Eliseo to see:



                    I heard Eliseo was a great fan of cartoons:



                    I am sure he likes to read books as well:



                    He is going to need them against the big powerpunching pimp.

                    That's ****ing hilarious lol

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Neuraxis
                      Everyone please stop feeding this troll.

                      Surely you're not saying it's going to grow, right?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP