Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

W. KlitschkO Fight Predictions

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Bozo took on all the Wlad fans by himself and beat them silly with logical arguments. While the Wlad fans resort to childish name calling, telling lies, or just being incredibly ******.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Warrior Spirit
      Bozo took on all the Wlad fans by himself and beat them silly with logical arguments. While the Wlad fans resort to childish name calling, telling lies, or just being incredibly ******.

      If you read the entire argument, and truly believe that he never resorted to any such behaviour, or avoided questions by only half-ass answering them, and then basically refusing to take responsibility for saying anything at all, you should read it again. I have never had any problem with debating boxing logically with anyone, but he knew what he was implying, and then refused to take any responsibility for it. A fighter's wins and losses are his, and his alone, and I have no problem saying that he lost the fights he lost, but to sit and imply that he's now going to be limited to fighting bums forever, or that he himself is a bum because his career has had some hiccups to me is not being very objective. If you believe that Bozo "took on all of the Wlad fans and beat them down single-handedly" then that's your perogative. As for me, I'm going to keep posting what I think, and continue taking resposibility for it, because I am not a coward.


      P.S I know I made a bunch of childish posts, but by that time, I had already realized that he wasn't going to answer anyone's questions, or objectively read anyone else's points, and sure wasn't about to acknowledge a point anyone else made, so I decided to just be a nuisance, since that's what he was being to me.
      Last edited by hollister; 04-13-2005, 11:24 AM.

      Comment


        Warrior Spirit is a reincarnation if CITA.
        Wlad Rules(at least I hope so)

        Comment


          Originally posted by hollister
          P.S I know I made a bunch of childish posts, but by that time, I had already realized that he wasn't going to answer anyone's questions, or objectively read anyone else's points, and sure wasn't about to acknowledge a point anyone else made, so I decided to just be a nuisance, since that's what he was being to me.
          That justification is good enough. There was nothing out of line in what you said. That Bozo guy is a complete jackoff man. I have no idea where he recieves his false information from, and he started the name calling when he insulted Neuraxis....who was merely asking a question he was unable to answer.



          | |

          Comment


            Originally posted by Warrior Spirit
            Bozo took on all the Wlad fans by himself and beat them silly with logical arguments. While the Wlad fans resort to childish name calling, telling lies, or just being incredibly ******.
            i disagree:
            - bozo claimed VK took the easy way out by not fighting ruiz or byrd
            - i claimed king killed those fights by demanding options on VK
            - bozo asked for proof
            - i provided it, a link to an interview with king.... this site won't post the words "d-o-g-h-o-u-s-e-b-o-x-i-n-g" but i still provided the links, just plug in "d-o-g-h-o-u-s-e-b-o-x-i-n-g" after the "www. "
            - unless bozo can prove that VK was offered a fight without options, then i was right and he was wrong

            Comment


              Originally posted by hollister
              If you read the entire argument, and truly believe that he never resorted to any such behaviour, or avoided questions by only half-ass answering them, and then basically refusing to take responsibility for saying anything at all, you should read it again. I have never had any problem with debating boxing logically with anyone, but he knew what he was implying, and then refused to take any responsibility for it. A fighter's wins and losses are his, and his alone, and I have no problem saying that he lost the fights he lost, but to sit and imply that he's now going to be limited to fighting bums forever, or that he himself is a bum because his career has had some hiccups to me is not being very objective. If you believe that Bozo "took on all of the Wlad fans and beat them down single-handedly" then that's your perogative. As for me, I'm going to keep posting what I think, and continue taking resposibility for it, because I am not a coward.


              P.S I know I made a bunch of childish posts, but by that time, I had already realized that he wasn't going to answer anyone's questions, or objectively read anyone else's points, and sure wasn't about to acknowledge a point anyone else made, so I decided to just be a nuisance, since that's what he was being to me.


              / Sigh...


              We're back to this are we?

              Again, the only "question" anyone asked me was "If you don't think Castillo is a good opponent, who should Wlad fight".

              It was asked 4 times, and 4 times I said: "I don't think Castillo is a very good opponent, but that EXACTLY the type of guy Wlad should be fighting to get some confidence back.


              So, like when you couldn't point out to me where I was "implying" anything you didn't agree with, once again, you can't mention anywhere I avoided a question.

              I think its clear and obvious how you foolish you were made to look by going off on that hissy fit about all the terrible things I was implying (still waiting to you to back that up), resorting to 100% making things up, and now saying I was avoiding questions.

              For probably the 6th time now: Please point out where I said or implied anything out of line about Wlad, and please point out where I was asked a question I avoided.

              Uh oh.

              Back to having to be honest again. You're screwed.

              lol.

              Last edited by Bozo_no no; 04-13-2005, 12:03 PM.

              Comment


                Dont haters keep you intellectually entertained?
                I mean what would we do without Bozo?
                But now we have him so we can embarass him.
                Life looks good so far, now the only thing we need is Wlad winning this fight.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by guru
                  i disagree:
                  - bozo claimed VK took the easy way out by not fighting ruiz or byrd
                  - i claimed king killed those fights by demanding options on VK
                  - bozo asked for proof
                  - i provided it, a link to an interview with king.... this site won't post the words "d-o-g-h-o-u-s-e-b-o-x-i-n-g" but i still provided the links, just plug in "d-o-g-h-o-u-s-e-b-o-x-i-n-g" after the "www. "
                  - unless bozo can prove that VK was offered a fight without options, then i was right and he was wrong

                  1. This is a completely different discussion from what I was talking about with others.

                  2. I said I felt Rahman was a weak opponent (a guy Ruiz already beat) and would have rathered he fought Byrd or Ruiz.

                  3. You have still yet to post a link that proves Don King killed any such fight with options. All you did was paste opinion based links, and one that makes a vague mention of options being discussed.

                  I told you already: James Toney was in the same boat. He wanted a shot at two King fighters (Byrd and Ruiz) and didn't want to switch from Goosen to King. Goosen EASILLY worked out a deal to have King sign on as a co promoter for James Toney. See how easy that was?

                  You're using Kings reputation as an excuse. You have no PROOF King killed any negotiations outright, and I just showed you how easy it would be for anyone who's not a King fighter to work something out without getting completly ****d. Vitali is a smart enough guy he's going to have to figure out how to work with King at some point. Don't act like its not possible.

                  Your just grabbing at straws.


                  Comment


                    i cant post the link directly, boxingscene wont let me... I ALREADY told you how to see the interview plug in "d o g h o u s e b o x i n g" after the www.

                    king admits to wanting the options and doesn't deny it... you haven't provided anything to back your story... show me where VK was offered a fight without options or where king denies wanting options

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
                      1. This is a completely different discussion from what I was talking about with others.

                      2. I said I felt Rahman was a weak opponent (a guy Ruiz already beat) and would have rathered he fought Byrd or Ruiz.

                      3. You have still yet to post a link that proves Don King killed any such fight with options. All you did was paste opinion based links, and one that makes a vague mention of options being discussed.

                      I told you already: James Toney was in the same boat. He wanted a shot at two King fighters (Byrd and Ruiz) and didn't want to switch from Goosen to King. Goosen EASILLY worked out a deal to have King sign on as a co promoter for James Toney. See how easy that was?

                      You're using Kings reputation as an excuse. You have no PROOF King killed any negotiations outright, and I just showed you how easy it would be for anyone who's not a King fighter to work something out without getting completly ****d. Vitali is a smart enough guy he's going to have to figure out how to work with King at some point. Don't act like its not possible.

                      Your just grabbing at straws.

                      How do you or any of us for that matter, know the intimate details of such an agreement? We don't have the contract, so how do you know how badly he was or wasn't screwed? Its all a matter of what a fighter is willing to settle for in order to make the fight. Both Klitschkos are already established, so it wouldn't be absolutely necessary to settle for beans and give up options
                      in order to gain recognition.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP