The fight should happen at 147 and split the money 50-50.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mayweather-Pacquiao: Both Sides Taking Hard Lines
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by GRUSTLER View PostBut if you also been reading my posts, you would have also seen that
I gave Pac an edge too and been back and forth about it. The reason
I can't fully commit to Pac is because I see his flaws and thought Cotto
had what it took to expose them but he didn't, so what, Pac won but
Cotto did have a shot but mentally broke down. Floyd is a different
story, he will beat Pac period, tell Pac to go to 147 and prove he can
truly beat Floyd. People say Floyd never fought a challenge at 147
but neither has Pacquiao because De La Hoya was dead at that weight
and Cotto was 145. The difference is all the guys Floyd fought were at 147. Props to Pac for spanking him but the truth is
the truth.
Comment
-
-
seriously manny would do a 50/50 regardless if its 145 or so..floyds just using that money shiet for an excuse not to fight..
even his father floyd sr said so...
whos floyd gonna fight? maybe he might just retire...
the 0 means more than money to floyd..
Comment
-
Originally posted by Puntoyhauf View Postgrus also picked hatton to win against PACQUIAO!
on him or 100% sure about him either. Sure he has done an excellent
job of beating all in his last three fights but Manny's flaws make me
uncertain. I'm not an expert when it comes to picking fights but when
it comes to Floyd/Pac, I'm riding with Floyd and know he will win because
now I am certain that he is the only one that can expose the flaws that
I see in Manny. Neither Hatton nor Cotto had a corner and Oscar was
done before he even stepped in the ring. Not taking anything away from
Manny but it is what it is. Cotto/Pac, I said either had a shot but leaned
towards Cotto because of his size, power and experience with bigger
fighters but Manny beat him and props for that BUT Floyd? No way
Manny manipulates his mind like he did with Cotto.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GRUSTLER View PostOK, so your saying that Miguel Cotto would be more dangerous than
Floyd Mayweather Jr? So how come Freddie Roach needs more time
to prepare and teach Manny a new style to approach Floyd? I thought
Cotto's power would play a factor but Manny proved me wrong
BIGTIME, so we know the way to beat Manny is not power, it's defense,
counter punching and footwork and I should of known that from JMM.
Floyd has all that but just on an advance level. No way Cotto would
have EVER beat Floyd, don't care if he fought him or not.
Why more time? the elections... Manny is running for congress come May 2010.
Floyd Jr might fight Cong. Manny Pacquiao on 2010... KING CONG.!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kulitoy View PostThe truth is he agreed to fight Marquez at 144 but came fighting more than the agreed weight. Floyd Cheater!!!!!!!
and Manny are cheaters to be in the WW division with a title and
not willing to have the fight be at 147.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Puntoyhauf View PostLAME!!!!!!
again you can't believe that Pacquiao is for real Grustler, how many times Pacquiao has made you look like a fool here huh?
like a fool because I am not an expert and just call it how I see it that's
all. Frankly you guys are looking like fools, seeing the truth and evidence
right in front of you and saying it's not so. I see Manny flaws like I saw
Cotto's and be talking about them for the longest but people thought I
was hating and come to find out I was 100% spot on about Cotto. So
if I have two fighters I am not sure about I'm going to lean towards the
one I think has more of an advantage and that was Cotto but come fight
night Pac showed me that he can hang and I never made excuses once
since I been on here correct? I gave Pac his props so why can't you guys
just see what I am presenting as what it is and don't get mad at me for
presenting it? FReddie Roach just said on the video that he will try to
take any advantage he could from Mayweather by bringing him down to
a catch weight, right or wrong? Did I make it up? So now you have to
ask yourself, did he feel the same way about Cotto? He fought Oscar
at 147 right? A lot of you mistaken my posts for hating but that is not
the case. Just because you don't agree with it doesn't make it not so.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GRUSTLER View PostI picked De La Hoya against Pacquiao too because I'm not too hung up
on him or 100% sure about him either. Sure he has done an excellent
job of beating all in his last three fights but Manny's flaws make me
uncertain. I'm not an expert when it comes to picking fights but when
it comes to Floyd/Pac, I'm riding with Floyd and know he will win because
now I am certain that he is the only one that can expose the flaws that
I see in Manny. Neither Hatton nor Cotto had a corner and Oscar was
done before he even stepped in the ring. Not taking anything away from
Manny but it is what it is. Cotto/Pac, I said either had a shot but leaned
towards Cotto because of his size, power and experience with bigger
fighters but Manny beat him and props for that BUT Floyd? No way
Manny manipulates his mind like he did with Cotto.
Right, Manny has flaws, which makes him more interesting...beating fighters in spite of his flaws. And Floyd Jr has no flaw? his heart is his flaw... his arrogance is THE FLAW... that might lead to his own defeat.
Yeah, no way this... no way that... you always say that since what?
NO WAY MANNY BEATS DELA HOYA...
NO WAY MANNY BEATS HATTON...
NO WAY MANNY BEATS COTTO...
but in respect to Floyd Jr and Pacs abilities... I give them 50/50 chance like I gave Hatton against Pacquiao.
Comment
Comment