Who is greater? Joseph Parker or Luis Ortiz

[billeau2]

Here's a thought, why don't you email His Excellency and tell him that, now he's bought Ring magazine, he should get them to stop ranking fighters based on wins and start ranking them by losses and triangle theories instead?

I don't care how someone ranks fighters as long as they disclose the criteria. But when we're talking about the level of ability objectively losses count. It is not necessarily triangle theory to gauge the relative merits of a performance based on a common opponent. It is when any of these measures becomes absolute and subjective that they become problematic. Using them all together to get a picture? Not really a problem.

One can also watch a fighter and know what they're looking at. Like you know a real boxing fan? Ortez may have been 72 when he fought Wilder fact is he didn't look like an old shot fighter. People make assumptions...

If you look at Parker and you see his development he has gotten better The economized is just moving more etc but he's just coming into that point.