Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: The Top 10 heavyweights of the 21st century so far

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by BrankoB View Post
    If they could put all these guys in a round robin tournament and we had to put money on one fighter only to survive until the end, I would put my money on Vitali. If I could put money on two fighters, the second one would be Lennox. In my book, those two beat everyone - prime for prime.
    Lewis wasn't in his prime in the 2000s, though. His prime was more in the mid 1990s.

    Comment


      #12
      Seriously???
      Where is Charles Martin?
      Where is Kubrat Pulev?
      Where is Bermaine Stiverne?
      World Champions, all of them.
      And recognized as such by MAJOR INTERNATIONAL SANCTIONING BODIES.
      SMH
      Last edited by Left Hook Louie; 12-23-2024, 06:12 PM.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by LAchargers373 View Post
        Usyk over Lewis on any list is blasphemy. Lewis was the best HW of this era by far.
        I agree but you know how it goes.
        LAchargers373 LAchargers373 likes this.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by DamonJJ View Post
          I think Usyk is a HOF, and really the only slam dunk HOFer of the last decade (though I think Fury gets in).

          That being said no way should he be above Wlad.
          If Fury gets in (and he will) then Joshua is a lock because he had a much better heavyweight reign than Fury and beat more decently ranked contenders.

          Wilder is the wildcard for me. Long reign but no CV and reputation pretty diminished once he started having to face credible fighters. But he's American. He'll probably go in too.

          Usyk isn't even worth talking about. He's in.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by BrankoB View Post
            If they could put all these guys in a round robin tournament and we had to put money on one fighter only to survive until the end, I would put my money on Vitali. If I could put money on two fighters, the second one would be Lennox. In my book, those two beat everyone - prime for prime.
            ^^^^^^^

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by famicommander View Post

              Lewis wasn't in his prime in the 2000s, though. His prime was more in the mid 1990s.
              We never seen Lennox on the decline. He lost and bounced back in his "prime". So you can't stay that. Just say you think Uysk is better. Stand on it. I personally think Vitali Klitschko Lennox should be 1 & 2.
              BrankoB BrankoB likes this.

              Comment


                #17
                Parker and Wilder over a two time heavyweight champion in Byrd is wild for me. I guess......
                BrankoB BrankoB likes this.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by BrankoB View Post
                  If they could put all these guys in a round robin tournament and we had to put money on one fighter only to survive until the end, I would put my money on Vitali. If I could put money on two fighters, the second one would be Lennox. In my book, those two beat everyone - prime for prime.
                  If you mean a prime Lennox beats a prime Vitali (a 50/50 proposition), then I could see that. I think the world of Usyk and have no problem saying he is my HW Champ through and through. But a prime Lewis has a better than 50% chance with Usyk because he more than compensates for Fury's deficits and very nearly has Fury's size and reach advantages. Not a slamdunk but it would be so very competitive. I think Lennox flies under the radar these days as an ATG because he didn't really have a larger-than-life persona. But jaysus, he took care of bidness in the ring.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Not a bad list and order

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Toffee View Post

                      If Fury gets in (and he will) then Joshua is a lock because he had a much better heavyweight reign than Fury and beat more decently ranked contenders.

                      Wilder is the wildcard for me. Long reign but no CV and reputation pretty diminished once he started having to face credible fighters. But he's American. He'll probably go in too.

                      Usyk isn't even worth talking about. He's in.
                      I disagree with some of this. Fury got to wlad first so I would put that as the biggest win either of the two had. Say what you want about wilder, but you acknowledge that he will probably get I the hall which means fury has two wins bigger than anything Joshua has other than his wlad win. Throw in Joshua’s sort of bad losses and I think fury clearly has the better resume.
                      JeBron Lamez JeBron Lamez likes this.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP