Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

James Toney vs ?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post



    You've again mentioned Holyfield's corpse which is also meaningless.
    Oh its saying a lot if you are saying Toney didn't beat nobody.

    That bum Joshua never beat a fighter with Holy's skill level

    Comment


      Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post


      Whereas AJ was unified champion with numerous wins over ranked HW's.
      Yeah ok and the minute they put him in the ring with a fighter who hit him back he lost all of it

      Comment


        Originally posted by djtmal View Post

        Oh its saying a lot if you are saying Toney didn't beat nobody.

        That bum Joshua never beat a fighter with Holy's skill level
        Well that's a fact, Toney beat nobody of note at Heavyweight.

        His one win there is Holyfield's corpse which is meaningless.

        AJ has 5 or 6 wins that totally eclipse that win, maybe more.

        Comment


          Originally posted by djtmal View Post

          Yeah ok and the minute they put him in the ring with a fighter who hit him back he lost all of it
          How does that make sense when he totally dominated that same fighter in the rematch? By the way a fighter in Ruiz who is 10x the HW Toney was and that win alone is better than any win Toney has at HW.

          AJ has numerous wins over top, ranked HW's.

          Toney on the other hand has no good wins at HW.

          Comment


            Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

            Toney beat a faded but still solid Holyfield.


            Corrected

            Comment


              Originally posted by djtmal View Post


              Thats exactly what it means
              No, actually it doesn't. Objectively it doesn't. Do you know that word, objectively? Ask your toothless hilbilly parents

              Toney lost, and drew MULTIPLE times with unranked journeyman as a massive favourite.

              That's a fact. Meaning, that argument, is a non-argument.

              Comment


                Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

                How does that make sense when he totally dominated that same fighter in the rematch?
                Let me guess. He didn't take him seriously the first time around

                Thats usually how most bums operate

                Comment


                  Originally posted by djtmal View Post

                  Corrected
                  Oh my god

                  You cannot be serious. You, of all people, who consider anyone who has lost a fight "shot" are now trying to say that Holyfield was "still solid"

                  You are aware that in his last 6 fights prior to Toney he was 2-2-2? And in his next fight after lost to LARRY DONALD

                  And you're saying that he was "still solid"

                  You are embarrassing yourself and I strongly suggest you log off the computer.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by djtmal View Post

                    Let me guess. He didn't take him seriously the first time around

                    Thats usually how most bums operate
                    I don't know.

                    Is that why Toney was easily beaten by unranked journeyman multiple times?

                    AJ never lost to journeyman ever, unlike Toney who did.

                    So what is your argument here? You see how it cannot work, right?

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

                      I don't know.

                      Is that why Toney was easily beaten by unranked journeyman multiple times?

                      AJ never lost to journeyman ever, unlike Toney who did.

                      So what is your argument here? You see how it cannot work, right?
                      Its works because Joshua is the weakest fighter on that list, and Toney never lost 9 in a row

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP