Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tims manager wants to vacate to fight Spence instead of Crawford

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Combat Talk Radio

    Is it a duck though?

    Asking because...why is it considered a duck?

    Is it because of the idea about dropping a belt rather than fight a threat that's called you out?

    If so...then we're affirming that Crawford DUCKED Boots Ennis. Because that happened there, too. It's the exact same situation. And there's a chance Crawford gets emailed a belt. Will NSB rightfully call him an email champion?

    See, we just need to be consistent is all.
    Again
    Why did Boots decide to go another direction when he could of been the mando ?
    Why did Boots refuse the fight twice ?
    Why don’t you answer the questions that matter Leicesterage instead of spewing bullchit as usual ?
    The only email champ here is you , hiding behind your keyboard saying lies
    Let’s keep it real , nah hey your bullchit sells more right

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Combat Talk Radio

      Is it a duck though?

      Asking because...why is it considered a duck?

      Is it because of the idea about dropping a belt rather than fight a threat that's called you out?

      If so...then we're affirming that Crawford DUCKED Boots Ennis. Because that happened there, too. It's the exact same situation. And there's a chance Crawford gets emailed a belt. Will NSB rightfully call him an email champion?

      See, we just need to be consistent is all.
      There's nothing consistent about your crap.

      Bud was forced to vacate because he had a contractual obligation to Spence. It's not his fault that Spence activated the rematch clause when he couldn't even fight.

      And whose fault is it that there was an outstanding mandatory? Who's mandatory was Boots to begin? Who was the IBF champ who only defended once in 4 years? Oh yeah, that was SPENCE.

      Who didn't petition for his mandatory shot until the fight was made, and avoid his shot at Spence for 5 months? That would be Ennis.

      Then let's look at who Bud wants to fight. Bud staked his shot at the winner of the fight that will crown a unified champion at 154. That's supposed to be a softer touch than the guy who got emailed the belt he already won?

      Meanwhile Tszyu would be dropping his belt to avoid Bud in order to fight the guy that Bud already destroyed.

      The fact that you don't see your hypocrisy is mind-blowing. Absolute trash takes from a mindless hater. You never miss a chance to spew lies at Bud. Would serve you right if he sued you for slander, troll.

      Comment


        #33
        I don't like it but the logic is sound. Hopefully not true.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by crimsonfalcon07 View Post

          There's nothing consistent about your crap.

          Bud was forced to vacate because he had a contractual obligation to Spence. It's not his fault that Spence activated the rematch clause when he couldn't even fight.

          And whose fault is it that there was an outstanding mandatory? Who's mandatory was Boots to begin? Who was the IBF champ who only defended once in 4 years? Oh yeah, that was SPENCE.

          Who didn't petition for his mandatory shot until the fight was made, and avoid his shot at Spence for 5 months? That would be Ennis.

          Then let's look at who Bud wants to fight. Bud staked his shot at the winner of the fight that will crown a unified champion at 154. That's supposed to be a softer touch than the guy who got emailed the belt he already won?

          Meanwhile Tszyu would be dropping his belt to avoid Bud in order to fight the guy that Bud already destroyed.

          The fact that you don't see your hypocrisy is mind-blowing. Absolute trash takes from a mindless hater. You never miss a chance to spew lies at Bud. Would serve you right if he sued you for slander, troll.
          And this guy has YouTube channel lmao
          Imagine telling people lies all day long and posting trash videos here that are just intended to cause controversy that doesn’t exist

          Comment


            #35
            Tim’s team thinks they can get a big payday and a win before Crawford fight.

            I would think same thing after watching Crawford destroy him.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
              Tim’s team thinks they can get a big payday and a win before Crawford fight.

              I would think same thing after watching Crawford destroy him.
              Yeah , this sounds about right
              Hoping it’s not the case

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by kiaba360 View Post
                This doesn't surprise me at all. Let me know if I'm wrong, but a manager's role is to cultivate and protect their investment. Fighting Crawford does neither. Jennings wants to make Tszyu a star in the U.S. before facing Crawford, because we know TC is essentially becoming a 'final boss' type of fighter. There's a high likelihood that TC leaves the ring with Tszyu's 0 and the titles.
                This is why Bivol is my favorite boxer. he didn`t speculate "oh, I must save my 0", he just took on the guy the most casuals felt he would have lost to.

                Tim is just one of the guys. I am disappointed if he choses Spence over Crawford.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by HeadShots View Post
                  Spence is a bigger draw than Crawford
                  Not now he isnt.

                  Apparently they have been in talks with TC, and TC got to be mandatory all set up, add Tim talking he wants TC and then all of a sudden Manager mentions Spence, it looks like Tim people would rather sidestep Crawford for another possibly broken name, obviously TC is not getting any younger and its to their benefit to wait him out, but the move wont fool fans.
                  MulaKO MulaKO likes this.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Combat Talk Radio

                    Is it a duck though?

                    Asking because...why is it considered a duck?

                    Is it because of the idea about dropping a belt rather than fight a threat that's called you out?

                    If so...then we're affirming that Crawford DUCKED Boots Ennis. Because that happened there, too. It's the exact same situation. And there's a chance Crawford gets emailed a belt. Will NSB rightfully call him an email champion?

                    See, we just need to be consistent is all.
                    Its not the same situation.

                    Bud is moving up in weight to win a title in a 4th weight class after becoming undisputed at 147. That's not a duck

                    Tim is talking about vacating his 154 belt to fight the loser of a 147 fight instead of the winner. Thats a duck


                    Bud vacating his 147 belts to fight roman villa instead of boots is the equivalent of what tszyu is considering
                    Last edited by Hustle; 03-28-2024, 04:19 PM.
                    Roadblock Roadblock likes this.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by Roadblock View Post

                      Not now he isnt.

                      Apparently they have been in talks with TC, and TC got to be mandatory all set up, add Tim talking he wants TC and then all of a sudden Manager mentions Spence, it looks like Tim people would rather sidestep Crawford for another possibly broken name, obviously TC is not getting any younger and its to their benefit to wait him out, but the move wont fool fans.
                      The only thing I’m surprised about is PBC didn’t trademark this casual change of opponents
                      It is in their best option to keep the belt in house
                      Roadblock Roadblock likes this.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP