Are you stalking me, i know were "brothers"(me better looking, more popular and have a bigger penis) but this is a joke
i m not stalking you , i m happy a cool guy like you reaches the 3000 count , it proves the quality of the site , and as youre the coolest poster the more you post the better.
you may wanna thank me cause our everlasting war gave a boost to your post count .
are Liston and Foreman paper champions? what are your opinions guys ....Rockin'
No way, there rated as two of the best heavys of all time.
Paper champs are fighters like Vivian Harris, Jeff Lacy, Arturo Gatti or Clinton Woods. Fighters calling themselves world champs without beating a named opponent yet.
i m not stalking you , i m happy a cool guy like you reaches the 3000 count , it proves the quality of the site , and as youre the coolest poster the more you post the better.
you may wanna thank me cause our everlasting war gave a boost to your post count .
and ,BTW :
******
Thank you tino, your a cool poster too(i'm gonna cry now).
Your a special guy, a really special guy!!
A ****ING SPECIAL NEEDS GUY, DUMB ASS!!
BTW i think our wars are funny, even though the French normally shy away from wars, you have proved a worthy rival.
John Ruiz classic paper champion. He was awarded the title in a court room. Lennox lewis, given the vacant WBC title in the court room.
Evander Holyfield won the vacant WBA title against Ruiz in August 2000, Lennox had vacated the belt, the title was meaningless!
Chris Byrd`s title won when Lennox vacated, this is a worthless title.
In fact, Klitscko isn`t really the champion, that title belongs to Lennox Lewis and will do untill the rumours of his comeback stop!
I think this post saved this otherwise ****ty thread. well put boxernyc
Thanks. And as for Foreman and Liston being paper champs, they were not. How many belts were there when Liston and Foreman took the titles? Didn't they have them all? Liston was thought to be the baddest man on the planet while he was champ. And Foreman beat both of the title holders with his skill and a crap load of power in 73 and again in 94. He stepped in the ring with the recognized champion and beat them. A paper champion is someone who has a belt no one respects (i.e. the six round belt from the Next Great Champ, that sh^t cracks me up every time!) or is awarded a belt without having to fight for it. In my opinion the Ring ****zine belt is the truest measure of who is the champ. I also recognize some of the other alphabet belts as actual belt holders. But I do it like the supreme court on a case by case basis.
I hear the term alot on this site about how fighters are only paper champions. Would anybody like to fill me in on what qualifies one to be a paper champion and then maybe identify a few for me. I read that one believed that Foreman and Liston were only paper champions. I am unable to comprehend the logic. Help me out here guys.........Rockin'
probably the term is coined to "champions" who didn't really deserve to be one. they are good only in paper, meaning, they're credentials are good only when written but not in action.
i disagree with foreman, the guy is a great champion
Comment