Pacquiao is impresive;Hopkins is BORING!-Roy Jones Jr.

[strugler]

lmao

he went up to the weight he started fighting at.

hopkins turned pro at 175.



he beat antonio tarver a natural 175 guy. that was a good win.

lost to joe calzaghe. NOT a 175 guy.

beat winky right at a catchweight in the light heavyweight division.

beat kelly pavlik also at a catchweight at light heavyweight.



in his last 4 fights in the light heavyweight division , he beat ONE light heavyweight.

he fought a super middleweight fighting for the first time at light heavy , a middleweight and a super welterweight.

viva bernard hopkins! he is legend!

RJJ beat an old version of Tito................................
RJJ got KTFO by BHOP's bitches tarver and johnson................
RJJ defeated the most respected heavyweight of this era in John Ruiz
BHOP v.s. Joe was close..........RJJ v.s. JC was a nightmare
RJJ was more entertaining...............BHOP was "scientific"....lol

[WhoreUs]

RJJ beat an old version of Tito................................
RJJ got KTFO by BHOP's bitches tarver and johnson................
RJJ defeated the most respected heavyweight of this era in John Ruiz
BHOP v.s. Joe was close..........RJJ v.s. JC was a nightmare
RJJ was more entertaining...............BHOP was "scientific"....lol

so i guess we only judge fighters by the last 5 years now?

if that's the case hatton > duran

duran hasn't done anything in 5 years.

[djtmal]

lol

maybe roy should have stayed at 160 and fought welterweights.

maybe roy wouldn't have gotten koed.

thats what nard did...

[strugler]

so i guess we only judge fighters by the last 5 years now?

if that's the case hatton > duran

duran hasn't done anything in 5 years.

not saying that.........but we do count it in............unless there a BHOP rule???...................

[WhoreUs]

Onlything Roy has on BHOP then is his speed and athletecism................and a win over heavyweight titleholder RUIZ............who perform better against Trinidad,tarver,Johnson,calazaghe?............not saying Roy isnt great but BHOP is greater imo...........

people age differently.

bernard in his late 30's was still competent while roy in his late 30's was shot.

don't you understand that?

who the hell did hopkins beat before tito in 2001?

holmes? a guy who couldn't win a nabf belt at 154 , so he moved up to 160 and became a long reigning title holder in one of the worst eras ever at 160.

that's hopkins' career. he was the best 160 guy in the worst era of the division and beat a couple big name welterweights.

that's it.

you obviously didn't follow roy's career in his prime.

[djtmal]

lmao

he went up to the weight he started fighting at.

hopkins turned pro at 175.



he beat antonio tarver a natural 175 guy. that was a good win.

lost to joe calzaghe. NOT a 175 guy.

beat winky right at a catchweight in the light heavyweight division.

beat kelly pavlik also at a catchweight at light heavyweight.



in his last 4 fights in the light heavyweight division , he beat ONE light heavyweight.

he fought a super middleweight fighting for the first time at light heavy , a middleweight and a super welterweight.

viva bernard hopkins! he is legend!

this is the truth...this is real truth right here...why hopkins nuthuggers get so gassed up over this overratedness is amazing...

[WhoreUs]

not saying that.........but we do count it in............unless there a BHOP rule???...................

roy is SHOT.

get that through your head. okay?



comparing how a past prime hopkins did against calzaghe with how a shot roy jones did against calzaghe is just plain ******.

ezzard charles did better against rocky marciano than joe louis. does that mean ezzard charles was better than joe louis?

[savorduhflavor]

Wow, Roy picked Cotto over Pac? That surprises me.

[strugler]

people age differently.

bernard in his late 30's was still competent while roy in his late 30's was shot.

don't you understand that?

who the hell did hopkins beat before tito in 2001?

holmes? a guy who couldn't win a nabf belt at 154 , so he moved up to 160 and became a long reigning title holder in one of the worst eras ever at 160.

that's hopkins' career. he was the best 160 guy in the worst era of the division and beat a couple big name welterweights.

that's it.

you obviously didn't follow roy's career in his prime.

naaah i know enough of roy....he did beat toney,bhop,griffin...........then what? the kevin kellys of the world............the LHW division during Roys reign wasnt exactly great too.........

[strugler]

roy is SHOT.

get that through your head. okay?



comparing how a past prime hopkins did against calzaghe with how a shot roy jones did against calzaghe is just plain ******.

ezzard charles did better against rocky marciano than joe louis. does that mean ezzard charles was better than joe louis?

LOL..................at your MANLOVE for ROY...............hence BHOPS longevity and performance surpasses the early shotness of roy..........