what is hopkins better than roy at except for aging better?
more defense of middleweight title..........never been KTFO.........never been dominated...................raps better too....................more street cred.................ages better too............
more defense of middleweight title..........never been KTFO.........never been dominated...................raps better too....................more street cred.................ages better too............
yea!!!.....but the street cred is about even!!!.....the streets love RJJ
more defense of middleweight title..........never been KTFO.........never been dominated...................raps better too....................more street cred.................ages better too............
lol
maybe roy should have stayed at 160 and fought welterweights.
more defense of middleweight title..........never been KTFO.........never been dominated...................raps better too....................more street cred.................ages better too............
Dominated by Roy, street cred and rapping is irrelevant and shows you are digging deep for ways Hopkins can be considered better, defenses of middleweight title are irrelevant because he lost to Roy who proceeded to move up and fight one of the best P4P fighters in the world and destroy him rather than stay and fight nobodies at middleweight.
Seriously, the only thing Hopkins has on Roy is chin and aging well. Roy was better at everything else and accomplished more than Hopkins without question.
Comment