It would have took Ali 20 seconds to work out how to beat Wlad's shuffle shuffle jab **** and he would have spent the next 14 rounds and 2 mins 40 secs beating him to a fcuking pulp.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Klitschkos would be just as dominating in the 60s and 70s
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by hammerhiem View PostIt would have took Ali 20 seconds to work out how to beat Wlad's shuffle shuffle jab **** and he would have spent the next 14 rounds and 2 mins 40 secs beating him to a fcuking pulp.
Comment
-
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by Cotto-Rulez View PostThey would be good fighters in the 70s but no way they would dominate. IMO they could be A level guys but still would lose to Larry Holmes, Ali, Foreman and Frazier. They would be on Ken Norton's level.
Both K's are tough and difficult opponents for every ATG HW, but they are not unbeatable. Lewis proved it (even if he did not look like a shining winner), and I'd give a prime Tyson, Lewis, Ali, Foreman and a few others a higher than 50% chance to win against either of the Klitschkos (in their prime, too).
Still, they are among the technically best and disciplined fighters HW had ever seen. It's a shame their competition is not great - most memorable people are defined by the odds they overcome, and the current HW division simply lacks "defining" opposition.
Comment
Comment